Skip to content
Development
Skill

/nw-persona-jtbd-analysis

Structured persona creation and JTBD analysis methodology - persona templates, ODI job step tables, pain point mapping, success metric quantification, and multi-persona segmentation

From plugin
nwave
628151 skills34 agents27 commands

Claude Code

$ npx -y skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-persona-jtbd-analysis --agent claude-code

SKILL.md

nw-persona-jtbd-analysis.SKILL.md
name: nw-persona-jtbd-analysis
description: Structured persona creation and JTBD analysis methodology - persona templates, ODI job step tables, pain point mapping, success metric quantification, and multi-persona segmentation
user-invocable: false
disable-model-invocation: true

Persona and JTBD Analysis

Use during Phase 1 (GATHER) when the user lacks clear personas or the "Who" section needs rigorous definition. Provides structured alternative to ad-hoc persona descriptions.

Persona Template

For each user type, build a complete persona:

## Persona: {Name}

**Who**: {Role description -- one sentence capturing relationship to product}
**Demographics**:
- {Characteristic 1: e.g., technical proficiency level}
- {Characteristic 2: e.g., frequency of interaction}
- {Characteristic 3: e.g., environment/context of use}
- {Characteristic 4: e.g., primary motivation}

**Jobs-to-be-Done**: (see Job Step Table below)

**Pain Points**:
- {Pain 1} -- maps to Job Step: {step name}
- {Pain 2} -- maps to Job Step: {step name}

**Success Metrics**:
- {Quantified outcome 1: e.g., "Task completed in < 2 minutes"}
- {Quantified outcome 2: e.g., "Zero manual configuration steps"}

Job Step Table

Each persona has job steps describing what they accomplish. Steps follow ODI format.

| Job Step | Goal | Desired Outcome | |----------|------|-----------------| | {Verb} | {What the user wants to achieve} | Minimize {metric} of {undesirable state} |

Rules for Job Steps

  • Job Steps are always **verbs**: Discover, Validate, Install, Configure, Monitor, Recover
  • Goals describe what the user **wants**, not what the system does
  • Desired Outcomes use ODI format: "Minimize [time/effort/risk/likelihood] of [undesirable state]"
  • Each step maps to a workflow point where value is created or destroyed

Example Job Step Table

| Job Step | Goal | Desired Outcome | |----------|------|-----------------| | Discover | Find the right tool for the task | Minimize time to evaluate fit | | Install | Get the tool running locally | Minimize steps to working state | | Configure | Adapt to local environment | Minimize likelihood of misconfiguration | | Verify | Confirm correct installation | Minimize uncertainty about readiness | | Start | Begin productive work | Minimize time from install to first output |

Pain Point Mapping

Every pain point maps to a specific job step. Pain points without a corresponding step indicate either a missing step or irrelevant pain point.

Pain Point: "I don't know if the tool supports my OS"
  -> Job Step: Discover
  -> Desired Outcome: Minimize uncertainty about compatibility

Pain Point: "Installation fails silently with no error message"
  -> Job Step: Install
  -> Desired Outcome: Minimize time to diagnose installation failures

Prioritize: pain points on high-frequency job steps deserve attention first.

Success Metric Quantification

Every success metric needs a number or threshold. Qualitative metrics ("easy to use") are not actionable.

| Qualitative | Quantified | |-------------|-----------| | "Easy to install" | "Install completed in < 2 minutes with zero manual steps" | | "Fast startup" | "First productive output within 30 seconds of launch" | | "Reliable" | "Zero silent failures; all errors produce actionable messages" | | "Intuitive" | "New user completes core task without reading documentation" |

Multi-Persona Segmentation

Different users have fundamentally different jobs even when using the same product. Segment by **relationship** to the product.

Common axes: **Frequency** (first-time vs returning vs power user) | **Role** (end user vs admin vs developer) | **Context** (individual vs team vs CI/CD) | **Motivation** (exploration vs production vs evaluation)

Example: Same Product, Different Jobs

| Persona | Primary Job | Key Difference | |---------|-------------|----------------| | Explorer | Evaluate the tool quickly | Needs fast time-to-value, minimal commitment | | Returner | Resume work after absence | Needs state preservation, quick re-orientation | | Deployer | Install for a team | Needs configuration management, multi-user setup | | Automator | Integrate into CI/CD pipeline | Needs scriptability, headless operation, exit codes |

Each persona gets their own Job Step table because workflows differ. Do not merge personas -- JTBD analysis value comes from surfacing differences.

Integration with Story Crafting

After completing persona analysis, feed results into LeanUX user story template:

1. Persona **Who** -> populated from persona template 2. Persona **Pain Points** -> inform story Problem section 3. Job Step **Desired Outcomes** -> inform AC (ODI outcomes translate to testable criteria) 4. **Success Metrics** -> inform NFR requirements in handoff package

Cross-reference: use `bdd-requirements` skill for Example Mapping once personas established. Use `jtbd-workflow-selection` skill to determine workflow for resulting stories.

Read more
@nwave-ai
Ships withnwave

AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with human judgment at every gate. nWave runs inside Claude Code. It breaks feature delivery into seven waves (discover, diverge, discuss, design, devops, distill, deliver).

628151 skills34 agents
Get the whole plugin

Stars on GitHub

Momentum

stars in total
628
Star history of nWave-ai/nWave on GitHub, a chart by star-history.com

Other skills on nwave.

nw-ad-critique-dimensions

nw-ad-critique-dimensi…

Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness,…

@nwave-ai@nwave-aiInstall Skill
nw-agent-testing

nw-agent-testing

5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance

@nwave-ai@nwave-aiInstall Skill

More skills from other plugins.

brainstorming
Auto-invoked

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…

@obra@obraInstall Skill
ask-matt

ask-matt

Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.

skills11d309k
@mattpocock@mattpocockInstall Skill
accessibility
Auto-invoked

accessibility

Design, implement, and audit accessible UI to WCAG 2.2 Level AA across Web, iOS, and Android — semantic ARIA roles and labels,…

ecc12d293k
@affaan-m@affaan-mInstall Skill
compiler-commit

compiler-commit

Use when you want to verify compiler changes and commit with the correct convention. Runs tests, lint, and format, then commits…

react2d252k
@facebook@facebookInstall Skill

Questions about nw-persona-jtbd-analysis.

Which coding agents can use nw-persona-jtbd-analysis?
nw-persona-jtbd-analysis installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.