/nw-opportunity-mapping
Opportunity Solution Trees, opportunity scoring, Lean Canvas, JTBD job mapping, and technique selection guide
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-opportunity-mapping --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-opportunity-mapping -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-opportunity-mapping -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-opportunity-mapping -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-opportunity-mapping -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-opportunity-mapping -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-opportunity-mapping -a windsurf -y
SKILL.md
nw-opportunity-mapping.SKILL.mdname: nw-opportunity-mapping
description: Opportunity Solution Trees, opportunity scoring, Lean Canvas, JTBD job mapping, and technique selection guide
user-invocable: false
disable-model-invocation: true
Opportunity Mapping
Opportunity Solution Tree (OST)
Connects desired outcomes to opportunities to solution ideas:
Desired Outcome
|
+-- Opportunity 1 (score)
| +-- Solution Idea A
| +-- Solution Idea B
|
+-- Opportunity 2 (score)
| +-- Solution Idea C
|
+-- Opportunity 3 (score)
+-- Solution Idea D
+-- Solution Idea EBuilding the OST
1. Define desired outcome from customer research 2. Map opportunities from interview insights (min 5 distinct) 3. Score each using Opportunity Algorithm 4. Generate solution ideas for top 2-3 5. Seek real diversity in solutions (avoid variations of same idea)
Opportunity Scoring Algorithm
**Formula**: Score = Importance + Max(0, Importance - Satisfaction) Importance: 1-10 | Satisfaction: 1-10 | Max score: 20
Use the canonical JTBD classification bands:
| Score | Meaning | Action | |-------|---------|--------| | 15 <= score <= 20 | Extremely underserved | High-priority investment | | 12 < score < 15 | Underserved | Strong opportunity | | 10 <= score <= 12 | Appropriately served | Maintain | | <10 | Overserved | Consider simplification |
DISCOVER G2 uses >8 as its selection threshold. Passing that threshold is not evidence that an outcome is underserved; rank candidates without changing their JTBD classification.
Process: gather importance + satisfaction from 5+ interviews, calculate per opportunity, rank, select top 2-3.
Job Mapping (JTBD)
Universal Job Map Steps
| Step | Goal | Outcome Format | |------|------|---------------| | Define | Determine what needs doing | Minimize time to identify [object] | | Locate | Find inputs/information | Minimize time to gather [resources] | | Prepare | Ready inputs for use | Minimize likelihood of missing [requirements] | | Confirm | Verify readiness | Minimize likelihood of incorrect [categorization] | | Execute | Perform core task | Minimize time from [start] to [completion] | | Monitor | Track progress | Minimize uncertainty about [status] | | Modify | Adjust if needed | Minimize effort to correct [issues] | | Conclude | Complete the job | Minimize time from [completion] to [result] |
Outcome statement format: **[Direction] + [Metric] + [Object] + [Clarifier]** Example: "Minimize the time it takes to identify which project budget a new expense should be allocated to"
Lean Canvas
One-page business model for Phase 4 viability validation.
1. **Problem**: Top 3 problems (Phase 1 validated) | 2. **Customer Segments**: by JTBD 3. **UVP**: single clear message | 4. **Solution**: top 3 features for top problems 5. **Channels**: path to customers (Phase 4 validated) | 6. **Revenue Streams**: monetization 7. **Cost Structure**: key costs | 8. **Key Metrics**: activity metrics 9. **Unfair Advantage**: not easily copied
4 Big Risks
| Risk | Question | Validation | |------|----------|-----------| | Value | Will customers want this? | Interviews, fake doors | | Usability | Can customers use this? | Prototype testing, task completion | | Feasibility | Can we build this? | Spikes, expert review | | Viability | Business model works? | Lean Canvas, stakeholder review |
Technique Selection Guide
| Goal | Techniques | |------|-----------| | Validate problem | Mom Test, Job Mapping | | Understand needs | Outcome Statements, Opportunity Mapping | | Prioritize opportunities | OST, Opportunity Algorithm | | Generate solutions | Ideation with OST constraints | | Validate solution value | Hypothesis Testing, Prototypes | | Test usability | Prototype testing, Task completion | | Assess feasibility | 4 Risks, Spikes | | Structure business model | Lean Canvas | | Continuous learning | Weekly customer touchpoints |
Read more
name: nw-opportunity-mapping description: Opportunity Solution Trees, opportunity scoring, Lean Canvas, JTBD job mapping, and technique selection guide user-invocable: false disable-model-invocation: true
Opportunity Mapping
Opportunity Solution Tree (OST)
Connects desired outcomes to opportunities to solution ideas:
Desired Outcome
|
+-- Opportunity 1 (score)
| +-- Solution Idea A
| +-- Solution Idea B
|
+-- Opportunity 2 (score)
| +-- Solution Idea C
|
+-- Opportunity 3 (score)
+-- Solution Idea D
+-- Solution Idea EBuilding the OST
1. Define desired outcome from customer research 2. Map opportunities from interview insights (min 5 distinct) 3. Score each using Opportunity Algorithm 4. Generate solution ideas for top 2-3 5. Seek real diversity in solutions (avoid variations of same idea)
Opportunity Scoring Algorithm
**Formula**: Score = Importance + Max(0, Importance - Satisfaction) Importance: 1-10 | Satisfaction: 1-10 | Max score: 20
Use the canonical JTBD classification bands:
| Score | Meaning | Action | |-------|---------|--------| | 15 <= score <= 20 | Extremely underserved | High-priority investment | | 12 < score < 15 | Underserved | Strong opportunity | | 10 <= score <= 12 | Appropriately served | Maintain | | <10 | Overserved | Consider simplification |
DISCOVER G2 uses >8 as its selection threshold. Passing that threshold is not evidence that an outcome is underserved; rank candidates without changing their JTBD classification.
Process: gather importance + satisfaction from 5+ interviews, calculate per opportunity, rank, select top 2-3.
Job Mapping (JTBD)
Universal Job Map Steps
| Step | Goal | Outcome Format | |------|------|---------------| | Define | Determine what needs doing | Minimize time to identify [object] | | Locate | Find inputs/information | Minimize time to gather [resources] | | Prepare | Ready inputs for use | Minimize likelihood of missing [requirements] | | Confirm | Verify readiness | Minimize likelihood of incorrect [categorization] | | Execute | Perform core task | Minimize time from [start] to [completion] | | Monitor | Track progress | Minimize uncertainty about [status] | | Modify | Adjust if needed | Minimize effort to correct [issues] | | Conclude | Complete the job | Minimize time from [completion] to [result] |
Outcome statement format: **[Direction] + [Metric] + [Object] + [Clarifier]** Example: "Minimize the time it takes to identify which project budget a new expense should be allocated to"
Lean Canvas
One-page business model for Phase 4 viability validation.
1. **Problem**: Top 3 problems (Phase 1 validated) | 2. **Customer Segments**: by JTBD 3. **UVP**: single clear message | 4. **Solution**: top 3 features for top problems 5. **Channels**: path to customers (Phase 4 validated) | 6. **Revenue Streams**: monetization 7. **Cost Structure**: key costs | 8. **Key Metrics**: activity metrics 9. **Unfair Advantage**: not easily copied
4 Big Risks
| Risk | Question | Validation | |------|----------|-----------| | Value | Will customers want this? | Interviews, fake doors | | Usability | Can customers use this? | Prototype testing, task completion | | Feasibility | Can we build this? | Spikes, expert review | | Viability | Business model works? | Lean Canvas, stakeholder review |
Technique Selection Guide
| Goal | Techniques | |------|-----------| | Validate problem | Mom Test, Job Mapping | | Understand needs | Outcome Statements, Opportunity Mapping | | Prioritize opportunities | OST, Opportunity Algorithm | | Generate solutions | Ideation with OST constraints | | Validate solution value | Hypothesis Testing, Prototypes | | Test usability | Prototype testing, Task completion | | Assess feasibility | 4 Risks, Spikes | | Structure business model | Lean Canvas | | Continuous learning | Weekly customer touchpoints |
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with human judgment at every gate. nWave runs inside Claude Code. It breaks feature delivery into seven waves (discover, diverge, discuss, design, devops, distill, deliver).
Other skills on nwave.
More skills from other plugins.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
ask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Questions about nw-opportunity-mapping.
- Which coding agents can use nw-opportunity-mapping?
- nw-opportunity-mapping installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.

