nw-ab-critique-dimensi…
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
Event Sourcing and CQRS as DDD implementation patterns — when to use, aggregate event streams, projections, snapshots, sagas, upcasting, conflict resolution
$ npx -y skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-ddd-eventsourcing --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/nw-ddd-eventsourcingContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Event Sourcing and CQRS as DDD implementation patterns — when to use, aggregate event streams, projections, snapshots, sagas, upcasting, conflict resolution
name: nw-ddd-eventsourcing description: Event Sourcing and CQRS as DDD implementation patterns — when to use, aggregate event streams, projections, snapshots, sagas, upcasting, conflict resolution user-invocable: false disable-model-invocation: true
Implementation patterns for DDD. Event Sourcing stores every state change as an immutable event and derives current state from replay. CQRS separates write and read models. These are tools, not mandatory architecture -- apply selectively to domains where they add value.
**ES adds value when**:
**ES is overkill when**:
**Key question**: "Does knowing the history of how we got here provide business value?" Yes -> consider ES. No -> traditional CRUD is simpler.
Events are immutable records of things that happened. Past tense: `OrderPlaced`, `PaymentReceived`, `ItemShipped`.
**Event structure**: Include all data needed to understand what happened (self-contained) | Use domain language | One event per meaningful business fact | Events carry data only, no behavior
**Granularity**: Too coarse (`OrderUpdated { order: {...} }`) loses what changed. Too fine (`OrderFieldChanged { field, old, new }`) is generic audit log. Just right (`OrderConfirmed { orderId, confirmedBy, confirmedAt }`) has clear business meaning.
Single source of truth. Core operations:
**Properties**: Append-only (never modify/delete) | Ordered within stream | Immutable | Versioned (each event has position)
**Stream identity**: Each aggregate instance owns a stream: `Order-123`, `Customer-789`. The stream ID is the aggregate ID.
1. Receive command -> validate business rules 2. Emit events -> record what happened 3. Apply events -> update internal state (no validation, no side effects) 4. Persist events -> append to event store
**Loading (rehydration)**: Read all events from stream -> create empty aggregate -> apply each event in order -> aggregate in current state, ready for commands.
| Aspect | Write Side (Commands) | Read Side (Queries) | |--------|----------------------|---------------------| | Purpose | Validate + change state | Serve information | | Model | Aggregates (normalized) | Projections (denormalized) | | Optimization | Consistency, correctness | Query speed, UX | | Scale | Lower throughput typically | Higher throughput | | Technology | Event store | Any DB (SQL, NoSQL, search, graph) |
**Data flow**: Command -> Aggregate -> Event Store -> Projection -> Read Model -> Query
Projections transform events into query-optimized views. Properties: **disposable** (rebuild from event store anytime) | **eventually consistent** (lag between event and update) | **purpose-specific** (one per use case) | **multiple** (same events feed many views)
**Types**: Live (real-time as events arrive) | Catch-up (replay from beginning, then switch to live) | One-off (replay once for analytics/migration)
**Rebuilding**: Delete read model -> replay all events from position 0 -> switch to live processing. This is a superpower: add new views retroactively from complete history.
For aggregates with thousands of events, periodically save state snapshot. On load: load latest snapshot + replay only events after snapshot. Fewer events to process.
**When**: After every N events (e.g., 100) or when load time exceeds threshold. Don't snapshot prematurely -- most aggregates have <100 events and load in milliseconds.
Business processes spanning multiple aggregates. A saga listens for events and issues commands to coordinate multi-step processes.
**Key principles**: React to events, issue commands (no business logic in saga) | Maintain process state (which step completed) | Handle compensation (rollback on failure) | Keep simple -- complex saga = design smell
**Todo Pattern** (alternative): Model process as a "todo list" aggregate tracking what needs to be done. All state visible in one place, progress queryable, easy to add/remove steps.
Events are immutable, but schemas evolve. Transform old formats to new during loading.
**Weak schema** (start here): Flexible format (JSON), handle missing fields with defaults.
**Explicit upcaster**: Transform V1 -> V2 in a pipeline during event loading, before reaching aggregate/projection.
**Upcaster chain**: V1 -> V2 -> V3. Each handles one version jump. Test all paths.
Two concurrent commands on same aggregate cause version conflict. Strategies: **Retry** (default, reload and re-execute) | **Merge** (domain-specific, both changes apply) | **Reject** (inform user, safest for critical operations). Start with retry -- most conflicts resolve automatically.
Read side lags write side. Typical: microseconds (same process) to low seconds (across network).
**Mitigation**: Read-your-own-writes (return command result directly, not from read model) | Optimistic UI (apply expected change on client immediately) | Causal consistency (version token with queries, wait until projection
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with human judgment at every gate. nWave runs inside Claude Code. It breaks feature delivery into seven waves (discover, diverge, discuss, design, devops, distill, deliver).
Repo: nWave-ai/nWave
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton…
Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement
5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance
Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating…