/nw-command-optimization-workflow
Step-by-step workflow for converting bloated command files to lean declarative definitions
$ npx -y skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-command-optimization-workflow --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/nw-command-optimization-workflow
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Step-by-step workflow for converting bloated command files to lean declarative definitions
SKILL.md
nw-command-optimization-workflow.SKILL.mdname: nw-command-optimization-workflow
description: Step-by-step workflow for converting bloated command files to lean declarative definitions
user-invocable: false
disable-model-invocation: true
Command Optimization Workflow
Overview
Convert oversized commands (500-2400 lines) to lean declarative definitions (40-300 lines) by removing duplication, extracting domain knowledge to agents, and adopting the forge.md pattern.
Phase 1: Analyze
1. **Classify**: dispatcher, orchestrator, or simple 2. **Measure**: `wc -l` the file 3. **Identify content categories** (approximate %): parameter parsing/validation | Workflow/orchestration logic | Agent prompt templates | Examples/documentation | Error handling | Boilerplate (orchestrator briefing, agent registry) 4. **Flag reducible content**: Duplication from other commands (orchestrator briefing, agent registry, parameter parsing) | Domain knowledge belonging in agents (TDD phases, review criteria, methodology) | Dead code (deprecated formats, aspirational features, old signatures) | Verbose examples (JSON blocks exceeding 3 examples) | Aggressive language (count CRITICAL/MANDATORY/MUST)
Phase 2: Extract
2a: Remove shared boilerplate
These blocks appear in 5-12 commands, extract to shared orchestrator preamble skill:
- "Sub-agents have NO ACCESS to Skill tool" briefing (~20-30 lines/file)
- Agent registry with capabilities (~15-20 lines/file)
- Parameter parsing rules (~10-15 lines/file)
- Pre-invocation validation checklist (~10-15 lines/file)
- "What NOT to include" blocks (~8-12 lines/file)
After extraction, command references preamble.
2b: Move domain knowledge to agents
If command contains HOW the agent works, move to agent definition or skill:
- TDD phase details -> nw-software-crafter | DIVIO templates -> nw-documentarist | Refactoring hierarchies -> nw-software-crafter | BDD/Gherkin -> nw-acceptance-designer | Review criteria -> reviewer agent | Mutation testing config -> nw-software-crafter
Command retains WHAT and success criteria. Agent owns HOW.
2c: Delete dead content
Remove: deprecated format references | Aspirational unimplemented features | Verbose JSON contradicting current format | BUILD:INJECT placeholders | Mixed-language comments
2d: Reduce aggressive language
- "CRITICAL: You MUST extract..." -> "Extract..."
- "MANDATORY: Use the Task tool" -> "Use the Task tool"
- "NON-NEGOTIABLE requirement" -> Remove adjective entirely
2e: Condense examples
Keep 2-3 canonical examples max. Each demonstrates distinct pattern (correct usage, edge case, common mistake).
Phase 3: Restructure
Apply declarative command template (load `command-design-patterns` skill): 1. Header: wave, agent, overview 2. Context files required 3. Agent invocation with configuration 4. Success criteria 5. Next wave handoff 6. Expected outputs
For orchestrators, add Phases section between overview and agent invocation.
Phase 4: Validate
- [ ] Under size target (dispatchers: 40-150, orchestrators: 100-300)
- [ ] No duplicated boilerplate
- [ ] No domain knowledge belonging in agents
- [ ] No aggressive language (CRITICAL/MANDATORY/MUST count = 0)
- [ ] 2-3 examples max
- [ ] No dead code or deprecated references
- [ ] Declarative structure (WHAT not HOW)
- [ ] Measurable success criteria
- [ ] Clear agent invocation pattern
Phase 5: Measure and Report
Report before/after: Line count (target 60-80% reduction for large files) | Content categories removed/moved | Aggressive language removed | Dependencies created (shared preamble, agent skill additions)
Special Case: develop.md (Mega-Orchestrator)
develop.md at 2,394 lines requires special handling: 1. Embeds 6+ sub-command workflows inline 2. Should reference sub-commands, not embed them 3. Orchestration logic (phase sequencing, resume) is legitimate -- keep it 4. Agent prompt templates for sub-commands -> replace with references 5. Target: 200-300 lines of pure orchestration
Approach: extract orchestration phases as lean sequence (which agent, which command, what context, what gate), remove all embedded sub-command content.
Shared Orchestrator Preamble
Extract common orchestrator knowledge to single shared skill:
- Architectural constraint about sub-agent tool access
- Valid agent list with brief capabilities
- Standard parameter parsing rules
- Pre-invocation validation pattern
- Correct/wrong invocation examples (2 each)
Estimated: ~60-80 lines. Replaces ~620 lines duplicated across commands.
Read more
name: nw-command-optimization-workflow description: Step-by-step workflow for converting bloated command files to lean declarative definitions user-invocable: false disable-model-invocation: true
Command Optimization Workflow
Overview
Convert oversized commands (500-2400 lines) to lean declarative definitions (40-300 lines) by removing duplication, extracting domain knowledge to agents, and adopting the forge.md pattern.
Phase 1: Analyze
1. **Classify**: dispatcher, orchestrator, or simple 2. **Measure**: `wc -l` the file 3. **Identify content categories** (approximate %): parameter parsing/validation | Workflow/orchestration logic | Agent prompt templates | Examples/documentation | Error handling | Boilerplate (orchestrator briefing, agent registry) 4. **Flag reducible content**: Duplication from other commands (orchestrator briefing, agent registry, parameter parsing) | Domain knowledge belonging in agents (TDD phases, review criteria, methodology) | Dead code (deprecated formats, aspirational features, old signatures) | Verbose examples (JSON blocks exceeding 3 examples) | Aggressive language (count CRITICAL/MANDATORY/MUST)
Phase 2: Extract
2a: Remove shared boilerplate
These blocks appear in 5-12 commands, extract to shared orchestrator preamble skill:
- "Sub-agents have NO ACCESS to Skill tool" briefing (~20-30 lines/file)
- Agent registry with capabilities (~15-20 lines/file)
- Parameter parsing rules (~10-15 lines/file)
- Pre-invocation validation checklist (~10-15 lines/file)
- "What NOT to include" blocks (~8-12 lines/file)
After extraction, command references preamble.
2b: Move domain knowledge to agents
If command contains HOW the agent works, move to agent definition or skill:
- TDD phase details -> nw-software-crafter | DIVIO templates -> nw-documentarist | Refactoring hierarchies -> nw-software-crafter | BDD/Gherkin -> nw-acceptance-designer | Review criteria -> reviewer agent | Mutation testing config -> nw-software-crafter
Command retains WHAT and success criteria. Agent owns HOW.
2c: Delete dead content
Remove: deprecated format references | Aspirational unimplemented features | Verbose JSON contradicting current format | BUILD:INJECT placeholders | Mixed-language comments
2d: Reduce aggressive language
- "CRITICAL: You MUST extract..." -> "Extract..."
- "MANDATORY: Use the Task tool" -> "Use the Task tool"
- "NON-NEGOTIABLE requirement" -> Remove adjective entirely
2e: Condense examples
Keep 2-3 canonical examples max. Each demonstrates distinct pattern (correct usage, edge case, common mistake).
Phase 3: Restructure
Apply declarative command template (load `command-design-patterns` skill): 1. Header: wave, agent, overview 2. Context files required 3. Agent invocation with configuration 4. Success criteria 5. Next wave handoff 6. Expected outputs
For orchestrators, add Phases section between overview and agent invocation.
Phase 4: Validate
- [ ] Under size target (dispatchers: 40-150, orchestrators: 100-300)
- [ ] No duplicated boilerplate
- [ ] No domain knowledge belonging in agents
- [ ] No aggressive language (CRITICAL/MANDATORY/MUST count = 0)
- [ ] 2-3 examples max
- [ ] No dead code or deprecated references
- [ ] Declarative structure (WHAT not HOW)
- [ ] Measurable success criteria
- [ ] Clear agent invocation pattern
Phase 5: Measure and Report
Report before/after: Line count (target 60-80% reduction for large files) | Content categories removed/moved | Aggressive language removed | Dependencies created (shared preamble, agent skill additions)
Special Case: develop.md (Mega-Orchestrator)
develop.md at 2,394 lines requires special handling: 1. Embeds 6+ sub-command workflows inline 2. Should reference sub-commands, not embed them 3. Orchestration logic (phase sequencing, resume) is legitimate -- keep it 4. Agent prompt templates for sub-commands -> replace with references 5. Target: 200-300 lines of pure orchestration
Approach: extract orchestration phases as lean sequence (which agent, which command, what context, what gate), remove all embedded sub-command content.
Shared Orchestrator Preamble
Extract common orchestrator knowledge to single shared skill:
- Architectural constraint about sub-agent tool access
- Valid agent list with brief capabilities
- Standard parameter parsing rules
- Pre-invocation validation pattern
- Correct/wrong invocation examples (2 each)
Estimated: ~60-80 lines. Replaces ~620 lines duplicated across commands.
AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with human judgment at every gate. nWave runs inside Claude Code. It breaks feature delivery into seven waves (discover, diverge, discuss, design, devops, distill, deliver).
Repo: nWave-ai/nWave
Other skills on nwave.
- /nw-ab-critique-dimensions
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
Open skill - /nw-abr-critique-dimensions
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
Open skill - /nw-ad-critique-dimensions
Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof
Open skill - /nw-agent-creation-workflow
Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement
Open skill - /nw-agent-testing
5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance
Open skill - /nw-architectural-styles-tradeoffs
Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating architecture styles.
Open skill

