/why
Iterative Five Whys root cause analysis drilling from symptoms to fundamentals
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill why --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill why -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill why -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill why -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill why -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill why -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill why -a windsurf -y
SKILL.md
why.SKILL.mdname: why
description: Iterative Five Whys root cause analysis drilling from symptoms to fundamentals
Five Whys Analysis
Apply Five Whys root cause analysis to investigate issues by iteratively asking "why" to drill from symptoms to root causes.
Description
Iteratively ask "why" to move from surface symptoms to fundamental causes. Identifies systemic issues rather than quick fixes.
Usage
`/why [issue_description]`
Variables
- ISSUE: Problem or symptom to analyze (default: prompt for input)
- DEPTH: Number of "why" iterations (default: 5, adjust as needed)
Steps
1. State the problem clearly 2. Ask "Why did this happen?" and document the answer 3. For that answer, ask "Why?" again 4. Continue until reaching root cause (usually 5 iterations) 5. Validate by working backwards: root cause → symptom 6. Explore branches if multiple causes emerge 7. Propose solutions addressing root causes, not symptoms
Examples
Example 1: Production Bug
Problem: Users see 500 error on checkout
Why 1: Payment service throws exception
Why 2: Request timeout after 30 seconds
Why 3: Database query takes 45 seconds
Why 4: Missing index on transactions table
Why 5: Index creation wasn't in migration scripts
Root Cause: Migration review process doesn't check query performance
Solution: Add query performance checks to migration PR template
Example 2: CI/CD Pipeline Failures
Problem: E2E tests fail intermittently
Why 1: Race condition in async test setup
Why 2: Test doesn't wait for database seed completion
Why 3: Seed function doesn't return promise
Why 4: TypeScript didn't catch missing return type
Why 5: strict mode not enabled in test config
Root Cause: Inconsistent TypeScript config between src and tests
Solution: Unify TypeScript config, enable strict mode everywhere
Example 3: Multi-Branch Analysis
Problem: Feature deployment takes 2 hours
Branch A (Build):
Why 1: Docker build takes 90 minutes
Why 2: No layer caching
Why 3: Dependencies reinstalled every time
Why 4: Cache invalidated by timestamp in Dockerfile
Root Cause A: Dockerfile uses current timestamp for versioning
Branch B (Tests):
Why 1: Test suite takes 30 minutes
Why 2: Integration tests run sequentially
Why 3: Test runner config has maxWorkers: 1
Why 4: Previous developer disabled parallelism due to flaky tests
Root Cause B: Flaky tests masked by disabling parallelism
Solutions:
A) Remove timestamp from Dockerfile, use git SHA
B) Fix flaky tests, re-enable parallel test execution
Notes
- Don't stop at symptoms; keep digging for systemic issues
- Multiple root causes may exist - explore different branches
- Document each "why" for future reference
- Consider both technical and process-related causes
- The magic isn't in exactly 5 whys - stop when you reach the true root cause
- Stop when you hit systemic/process issues, not just technical details
- Multiple root causes are common—explore branches separately
- If "human error" appears, keep digging: why was error possible?
- Document every "why" for future reference
- Root cause usually involves: missing validation, missing docs, unclear process, or missing automation
- Test solutions: implement → verify symptom resolved → monitor for recurrence
Read more
name: why description: Iterative Five Whys root cause analysis drilling from symptoms to fundamentals
Five Whys Analysis
Apply Five Whys root cause analysis to investigate issues by iteratively asking "why" to drill from symptoms to root causes.
Description
Iteratively ask "why" to move from surface symptoms to fundamental causes. Identifies systemic issues rather than quick fixes.
Usage
`/why [issue_description]`
Variables
- ISSUE: Problem or symptom to analyze (default: prompt for input)
- DEPTH: Number of "why" iterations (default: 5, adjust as needed)
Steps
1. State the problem clearly 2. Ask "Why did this happen?" and document the answer 3. For that answer, ask "Why?" again 4. Continue until reaching root cause (usually 5 iterations) 5. Validate by working backwards: root cause → symptom 6. Explore branches if multiple causes emerge 7. Propose solutions addressing root causes, not symptoms
Examples
Example 1: Production Bug
Problem: Users see 500 error on checkout Why 1: Payment service throws exception Why 2: Request timeout after 30 seconds Why 3: Database query takes 45 seconds Why 4: Missing index on transactions table Why 5: Index creation wasn't in migration scripts Root Cause: Migration review process doesn't check query performance Solution: Add query performance checks to migration PR template
Example 2: CI/CD Pipeline Failures
Problem: E2E tests fail intermittently Why 1: Race condition in async test setup Why 2: Test doesn't wait for database seed completion Why 3: Seed function doesn't return promise Why 4: TypeScript didn't catch missing return type Why 5: strict mode not enabled in test config Root Cause: Inconsistent TypeScript config between src and tests Solution: Unify TypeScript config, enable strict mode everywhere
Example 3: Multi-Branch Analysis
Problem: Feature deployment takes 2 hours Branch A (Build): Why 1: Docker build takes 90 minutes Why 2: No layer caching Why 3: Dependencies reinstalled every time Why 4: Cache invalidated by timestamp in Dockerfile Root Cause A: Dockerfile uses current timestamp for versioning Branch B (Tests): Why 1: Test suite takes 30 minutes Why 2: Integration tests run sequentially Why 3: Test runner config has maxWorkers: 1 Why 4: Previous developer disabled parallelism due to flaky tests Root Cause B: Flaky tests masked by disabling parallelism Solutions: A) Remove timestamp from Dockerfile, use git SHA B) Fix flaky tests, re-enable parallel test execution
Notes
- Don't stop at symptoms; keep digging for systemic issues
- Multiple root causes may exist - explore different branches
- Document each "why" for future reference
- Consider both technical and process-related causes
- The magic isn't in exactly 5 whys - stop when you reach the true root cause
- Stop when you hit systemic/process issues, not just technical details
- Multiple root causes are common—explore branches separately
- If "human error" appears, keep digging: why was error possible?
- Document every "why" for future reference
- Root cause usually involves: missing validation, missing docs, unclear process, or missing automation
- Test solutions: implement → verify symptom resolved → monitor for recurrence
A hand-crafted collection of advanced context engineering techniques and patterns with minimal token footprint, focused on improving agent result quality and predictability.
Other skills on context-engineering-kit.
add-task
creates draft task file in .specs/tasks/draft/ with original user intent
agent-evaluation
Evaluate and improve Claude Code commands, skills, and agents. Use when testing prompt effectiveness, validating context…
analyse-problem
Comprehensive A3 one-page problem analysis with root cause and action plan
analyse
Auto-selects best Kaizen method (Gemba Walk, Value Stream, or Muda) for target
analyze-issue
Analyze a GitHub issue and create a detailed technical specification
More skills from other plugins.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
ask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Questions about why.
- Which coding agents can use why?
- why installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.

