/subagent-driven-development
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session or facing 3+ independent issues that can be investigated without shared state or dependencies - dispatches fresh subagent for each task with code review between tasks, enabling fast iteration
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill subagent-driven-development --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill subagent-driven-development -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill subagent-driven-development -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill subagent-driven-development -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill subagent-driven-development -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill subagent-driven-development -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill subagent-driven-development -a windsurf -y
SKILL.md
subagent-driven-development.SKILL.mdname: subagent-driven-development
description: Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session or facing 3+ independent issues that can be investigated without shared state or dependencies - dispatches fresh subagent for each task with code review between tasks, enabling fast iteration with quality gates
Subagent-Driven Development
Create and execute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task or issue, with code and output review after each or batch of tasks.
**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + review between or after tasks = high quality, fast iteration.
Executing Plans through agents:
- Same session (no context switch)
- Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution)
- Code review after each or batch of task (catch issues early)
- Faster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)
Supported types of execution
Sequential Execution
When you have a tasks or issues that are related to each other, and they need to be executed in order, investigating or modifying them sequentially is the best way to go.
Dispatch one agent per task or issue. Let it work sequentially. Review the output and code after each task or issue.
**When to use:**
- Tasks are tightly coupled
- Tasks should be executed in order
Parallel Execution
When you have multiple unrelated tasks or issues (different files, different subsystems, different bugs), investigatin or modifying them sequentially wastes time. Each task or investigation is independent and can happen in parallel.
Dispatch one agent per independent problem domain. Let them work concurrently.
**When to use:**
- Tasks are mostly independent
- Overral review can be done after all tasks are completed
Sequential Execution Process
1. Load Plan
Read plan file, create TodoWrite with all tasks.
2. Execute Task with Subagent
For each task:
**Dispatch fresh subagent:**
Task tool (general-purpose):
description: "Implement Task N: [task name]"
prompt: |
You are implementing Task N from [plan-file].
Read that task carefully. Your job is to:
1. Implement exactly what the task specifies
2. Write tests (following TDD if task says to)
3. Verify implementation works
4. Commit your work
5. Report back
Work from: [directory]
Report: What you implemented, what you tested, test results, files changed, any issues**Subagent reports back** with summary of work.
3. Review Subagent's Work
**Dispatch code-reviewer subagent:**
Task tool (superpowers:code-reviewer):
Use template at requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md
WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: [from subagent's report]
PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task N from [plan-file]
BASE_SHA: [commit before task]
HEAD_SHA: [current commit]
DESCRIPTION: [task summary]
**Code reviewer returns:** Strengths, Issues (Critical/Important/Minor), Assessment
4. Apply Review Feedback
**If issues found:**
- Fix Critical issues immediately
- Fix Important issues before next task
- Note Minor issues
**Dispatch follow-up subagent if needed:**
"Fix issues from code review: [list issues]"
5. Mark Complete, Next Task
- Mark task as completed in TodoWrite
- Move to next task
- Repeat steps 2-5
6. Final Review
After all tasks complete, dispatch final code-reviewer:
- Reviews entire implementation
- Checks all plan requirements met
- Validates overall architecture
7. Complete Development
After final review passes:
- Announce: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch
- Follow that skill to verify tests, present options, execute choice
Example Workflow
You: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan.
[Load plan, create TodoWrite]
Task 1: Hook installation script
[Dispatch implementation subagent]
Subagent: Implemented install-hook with tests, 5/5 passing
[Get git SHAs, dispatch code-reviewer]
Reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage. Issues: None. Ready.
[Mark Task 1 complete]
Task 2: Recovery modes
[Dispatch implementation subagent]
Subagent: Added verify/repair, 8/8 tests passing
[Dispatch code-reviewer]
Reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Missing progress reporting
[Dispatch fix subagent]
Fix subagent: Added progress every 100 conversations
[Verify fix, mark Task 2 complete]
...
[After all tasks]
[Dispatch final code-reviewer]
Final reviewer: All requirements met, ready to merge
Done!
Red Flags
**Never:**
- Skip code review between tasks
- Proceed with unfixed Critical issues
- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)
- Implement without reading plan task
**If subagent fails task:**
- Dispatch fix subagent with specific instructions
- Don't try to fix manually (context pollution)
Parallel Execution Process
Load plan, review critically, execute tasks in batches, report for review between batches.
**Core principle:** Batch execution with checkpoints for architect review.
**Announce at start:** "I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan."
Step 1: Load and Review Plan
1. Read plan file 2. Review critically - identify any questions or concerns about the plan 3. If concerns: Raise them with your human partner before starting 4. If no concerns: Create TodoWrite and proceed
Step 2: Execute Batch
**Default: First 3 tasks**
For each task:
1. Mark as in_progress 2. Follow each step exactly (plan has bite-sized steps) 3. Run verifications as specified 4. Mark as completed
Step 3: Report
When batch complete:
- Show what was implemented
- Show verification output
- Say: "Ready for feedback."
Step 4: Continue
Based on feedback:
- Apply changes if needed
- Execute next batch
- Repeat until complete
Step 5: Complete Development
After all tasks complete and verified:
- Announce: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill
Read more
name: subagent-driven-development description: Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session or facing 3+ independent issues that can be investigated without shared state or dependencies - dispatches fresh subagent for each task with code review between tasks, enabling fast iteration with quality gates
Subagent-Driven Development
Create and execute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task or issue, with code and output review after each or batch of tasks.
**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + review between or after tasks = high quality, fast iteration.
Executing Plans through agents:
- Same session (no context switch)
- Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution)
- Code review after each or batch of task (catch issues early)
- Faster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)
Supported types of execution
Sequential Execution
When you have a tasks or issues that are related to each other, and they need to be executed in order, investigating or modifying them sequentially is the best way to go.
Dispatch one agent per task or issue. Let it work sequentially. Review the output and code after each task or issue.
**When to use:**
- Tasks are tightly coupled
- Tasks should be executed in order
Parallel Execution
When you have multiple unrelated tasks or issues (different files, different subsystems, different bugs), investigatin or modifying them sequentially wastes time. Each task or investigation is independent and can happen in parallel.
Dispatch one agent per independent problem domain. Let them work concurrently.
**When to use:**
- Tasks are mostly independent
- Overral review can be done after all tasks are completed
Sequential Execution Process
1. Load Plan
Read plan file, create TodoWrite with all tasks.
2. Execute Task with Subagent
For each task:
**Dispatch fresh subagent:**
Task tool (general-purpose):
description: "Implement Task N: [task name]"
prompt: |
You are implementing Task N from [plan-file].
Read that task carefully. Your job is to:
1. Implement exactly what the task specifies
2. Write tests (following TDD if task says to)
3. Verify implementation works
4. Commit your work
5. Report back
Work from: [directory]
Report: What you implemented, what you tested, test results, files changed, any issues**Subagent reports back** with summary of work.
3. Review Subagent's Work
**Dispatch code-reviewer subagent:**
Task tool (superpowers:code-reviewer): Use template at requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: [from subagent's report] PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task N from [plan-file] BASE_SHA: [commit before task] HEAD_SHA: [current commit] DESCRIPTION: [task summary]
**Code reviewer returns:** Strengths, Issues (Critical/Important/Minor), Assessment
4. Apply Review Feedback
**If issues found:**
- Fix Critical issues immediately
- Fix Important issues before next task
- Note Minor issues
**Dispatch follow-up subagent if needed:**
"Fix issues from code review: [list issues]"
5. Mark Complete, Next Task
- Mark task as completed in TodoWrite
- Move to next task
- Repeat steps 2-5
6. Final Review
After all tasks complete, dispatch final code-reviewer:
- Reviews entire implementation
- Checks all plan requirements met
- Validates overall architecture
7. Complete Development
After final review passes:
- Announce: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch
- Follow that skill to verify tests, present options, execute choice
Example Workflow
You: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan. [Load plan, create TodoWrite] Task 1: Hook installation script [Dispatch implementation subagent] Subagent: Implemented install-hook with tests, 5/5 passing [Get git SHAs, dispatch code-reviewer] Reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage. Issues: None. Ready. [Mark Task 1 complete] Task 2: Recovery modes [Dispatch implementation subagent] Subagent: Added verify/repair, 8/8 tests passing [Dispatch code-reviewer] Reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Missing progress reporting [Dispatch fix subagent] Fix subagent: Added progress every 100 conversations [Verify fix, mark Task 2 complete] ... [After all tasks] [Dispatch final code-reviewer] Final reviewer: All requirements met, ready to merge Done!
Red Flags
**Never:**
- Skip code review between tasks
- Proceed with unfixed Critical issues
- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)
- Implement without reading plan task
**If subagent fails task:**
- Dispatch fix subagent with specific instructions
- Don't try to fix manually (context pollution)
Parallel Execution Process
Load plan, review critically, execute tasks in batches, report for review between batches.
**Core principle:** Batch execution with checkpoints for architect review.
**Announce at start:** "I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan."
Step 1: Load and Review Plan
1. Read plan file 2. Review critically - identify any questions or concerns about the plan 3. If concerns: Raise them with your human partner before starting 4. If no concerns: Create TodoWrite and proceed
Step 2: Execute Batch
**Default: First 3 tasks**
For each task:
1. Mark as in_progress 2. Follow each step exactly (plan has bite-sized steps) 3. Run verifications as specified 4. Mark as completed
Step 3: Report
When batch complete:
- Show what was implemented
- Show verification output
- Say: "Ready for feedback."
Step 4: Continue
Based on feedback:
- Apply changes if needed
- Execute next batch
- Repeat until complete
Step 5: Complete Development
After all tasks complete and verified:
- Announce: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill
A hand-crafted collection of advanced context engineering techniques and patterns with minimal token footprint, focused on improving agent result quality and predictability.
Other skills on context-engineering-kit.
add-task
creates draft task file in .specs/tasks/draft/ with original user intent
agent-evaluation
Evaluate and improve Claude Code commands, skills, and agents. Use when testing prompt effectiveness, validating context…
analyse-problem
Comprehensive A3 one-page problem analysis with root cause and action plan
analyse
Auto-selects best Kaizen method (Gemba Walk, Value Stream, or Muda) for target
analyze-issue
Analyze a GitHub issue and create a detailed technical specification
More skills from other plugins.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
ask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Questions about subagent-driven-development.
- Which coding agents can use subagent-driven-development?
- subagent-driven-development installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.

