agent-teams-command
Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require…
Use when an agent is about to claim completion, correctness, safety, publication, deployment, or any consequential external fact.
$ npx -y skills add Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills --skill verify-before-claim --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/verify-before-claimContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use when an agent is about to claim completion, correctness, safety, publication, deployment, or any consequential external fact.
name: verify-before-claim description: Use when an agent is about to claim completion, correctness, safety, publication, deployment, or any consequential external fact. metadata: version: "8.1.0" updated: "2026-08-18" profile: "high-risk" assumes: "At least one objective verification method or authoritative source can be identified." conflicts_with: "Inferring success from effort, stale evidence, partial checks, or self-authored assertions."
<skill_contract> <input>One falsifiable claim, its artifact or system, risk, expected result, permissions, and available checks.</input> <output>A scoped claim decision with fresh evidence, residual risk, approval, and rollback status.</output> <done>The cheapest direct check after the final material change supports the exact allowed wording.</done> <non_goals>Producing the artifact, inferring success from effort, or widening a claim beyond checked evidence.</non_goals>
No evidence, no claim. Match the check to the exact claim, use fresh evidence, and keep execution authority separate from approval authority for consequential actions.
Provide: proposed claim, artifact or system, risk level, available checks, expected result, permissions, and rollback path.
<intake>
1. Rewrite the proposed statement as one falsifiable claim. 2. Classify risk: low, material, or consequential. 3. Select the cheapest check that directly tests the claim. 4. Record expected signal, time boundary, and acceptable evidence.
</intake>
<unknowns_gate>
If the artifact, expected behavior, or verification method is missing, return `NEEDS_INPUT`. If only indirect evidence exists, return `INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE` or narrow the claim; never fill the gap with confidence language.
</unknowns_gate>
<execute>
Run the selected check after the final material change. Examples: targeted test, lint, build, link check, read-after-write, diff inspection, source comparison, dashboard query, or deployment health check. Capture command/query, timestamp, scope, exit status, and key output.
Treat runtime termination as control evidence, not task evidence. A normalized `complete` signal still needs the acceptance check; a tool request needs a host execution receipt; truncation needs a checkpoint; refusal/error/unknown cannot support completion. A claimed `NO_OP` needs a fresh eligibility query, an output-count check, and proof that no prohibited side effect occurred.
For material or consequential claims, obtain independent verification from a separate check, reviewer, or evidence source. Require human approval before irreversible publication, deployment, spending, deletion, credential use, or policy change. Confirm the rollback path before execution.
For Graph claims, verify static contract integrity, every required node and join receipt, terminal acceptance, budgets, permission/compensation state, and checkpoint identity. Passing nodes do not prove the end-to-end graph.
</execute>
<evaluate>
Compare observed versus expected result. Decide `supported`, `partially_supported`, `unsupported`, or `blocked`. Check scope: passing one test cannot prove the full suite; a successful write cannot prove link integrity. State residual risk and evidence age.
</evaluate>
<retry_policy>
`max_attempts: 2`. Retry only after diagnosing the failure and changing input, tool, scope, or strategy. Stop on repeated signature or `NO_PROGRESS`; never rerun an unchanged check to manufacture confidence.
</retry_policy>
<state_contract>
Persist `{run_id, status, attempt, budget, evidence, unknowns, last_error, next_action}` plus claim, risk, check specification, expected/observed results, approval receipt, and rollback readiness. Append verification events so evidence age remains visible.
</state_contract>
Return `status`, `result` (claim decision and allowed wording), `evidence` (fresh receipts), `unknowns` (including residual risk), and `next_action` (repair, approval, rollback, or stop).
truncation: withhold completion and verify from the checkpoint.
eligibility and side-effect checks both pass.
withhold graph completion and return `VERIFY_FAILED`.
</skill_contract>
Verification-first Agent Skills for Codex OS, with optional compatibility adapters for Claude Code, Gemini, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require…
Use when designing or refactoring a model-native engineering workflow with bounded autonomy, probes, custom evaluation, durable…
Use when property-service operations need an AI plus ontology plus DMAIC design for work orders, dispatch, quotes, evidence, CTQ…
Use when a personal or team operating system needs a bounded redesign using Four-C, closed-loop controls, 70/30 allocation, 3B…
Use when a goal must be converted into a repeatable behavior, cue, SOP, review cadence, and identity-aligned reinforcement.
Use when source material must be transformed into a compact, evidence-aware model for learning, decisions, or an Obsidian concept…