agentic-engineering
Use when designing or refactoring a model-native engineering workflow with bounded autonomy, probes, custom evaluation, durable…
Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require bounded multi-agent command scaled from 5 to 100+ agents.
$ npx -y skills add Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills --skill agent-teams-command --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/agent-teams-commandContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require bounded multi-agent command scaled from 5 to 100+ agents.
name: agent-teams-command description: Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require bounded multi-agent command scaled from 5 to 100+ agents. metadata: version: "8.1.0" updated: "2026-08-18" profile: "high-risk" assumes: "The runtime supports isolated workers, durable shared task lists, token budgeting, and explicit integration ownership." conflicts_with: "Parallelism without pre-flight task lists, unbudgeted token burning, overlapping write ownership, or chat-only coordination."
<skill_contract> <input>A mission with independently ownable workstreams, time SLA requirements, pre-flight task list, token budget, interfaces, permissions, and an integration owner.</input> <output>An isolated worker fleet (5 to 100+ agents), typed IPC ledger, pre-allocated token ledger, serial integration, cleanup, and evidence receipts.</output> <done>Pre-flight task list is 100% reconciled, integrated artifacts pass mission checks, token consumption is within TCLR boundaries, and cleanup gates pass.</done> <non_goals>Parallelism without a task list, unbounded token burn, overlapping writers, or worker self-certification.</non_goals>
Strategic intent and final integration remain serial; owned execution runs in dynamically scaled parallel squadrons (5, 10, 50, 100+ agents). Use the Ender lens for commander intent and squad autonomy, Palantir for operational objects/actions, and von Neumann for executable process architecture. Detailed patterns: `references/ender-palantir-command-patterns.md`; examples: `references/classic-campaigns.md`.
Provide: mission, time SLA, task list candidate, workstreams, scaling tier (5/10/50/100+), dependencies, acceptance criteria, token budget (ETC limit), permissions, runtime capabilities, and integration owner.
<intake>
1. **Mission Intake & Scale Triage**: Analyze mission complexity and select the smallest supported tier: Tier 1 (Squad: 5 agents), Tier 2 (Squadron: 10 agents), Tier 3 (Battle Group: 50 agents), or Tier 4 (Fleet: 100+ agents). If the runtime exposes fewer slots, cap the active fleet to that observed limit. 2. **Pre-flight Task List & Token Gate**: Generate structured task list with explicit owner, territory, expected output, verification command, and token budget (ETC). 3. **Territory Mapping**: Partition work into non-overlapping directories or git worktrees. Every worker gets strictly exclusive write boundaries.
</intake>
<unknowns_gate>
If dependencies, write ownership, or verification commands are ambiguous, return `NEEDS_INPUT` or `INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE`. Do not launch parallel workers before pre-flight task list and token ledger are fully reconciled.
</unknowns_gate>
<execute>
1. **Launch Workers**: Dispatch workers in parallel across isolated worktrees. Each receives a typed `context_manifest` containing only its objective, dependencies, territory, inputs, output schema, budget, and verifier. 2. **Typed IPC & Command Board**: Workers report state transitions (`pending` -> `active` -> `review` -> `accepted` -> `closed`) to shared command board. 3. **Independent Verification**: Evaluator and reviewer agents verify worker outputs against objective criteria. No worker self-certification. 4. **Serial Integration & Join Gate**: Integrator aggregates verified artifacts and receipts in dependency order. Do not merge private branch transcripts into the integration context. Run regression tests. 5. **Durable Write-back & Cleanup**: Persist execution receipts, update system logs, and clean up temporary worktree branches.
For high-risk operations or cross-repo modifications, require independent review and human approval. Prepare a rollback plan before applying writes.
</execute>
<evaluate>
Audit total token consumption against the mission-declared TCLR: verified tasks resolved per 10,000 effective tokens consumed. Higher is better; do not invent a universal threshold. Verify all workstreams reached `accepted` or `closed` state, no file ownership conflicts occurred, and the declared regression suite passed.
</evaluate>
<retry_policy>
`max_attempts: 2`. Stop on repeated failure signature or `NO_PROGRESS`. If a worker stalls or fails, reassign territory or downgrade to serial execution rather than launching unbudgeted retries.
</retry_policy>
<state_contract>
Persist `{mission_id, run_id, status, attempt, budget, token_ledger, task_list, worker_fleet, context_manifest, command_board, evidence, unknowns, next_action}` in durable storage.
</state_contract>
Return `status`, `result` (worker fleet summary, task resolution ledger, and verified artifacts), `evidence` (source receipts, lint receipts, and integration logs), `unknowns`, and `next_action` including approval or rollback when relevant.
Verification-first Agent Skills for Codex OS, with optional compatibility adapters for Claude Code, Gemini, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Use when designing or refactoring a model-native engineering workflow with bounded autonomy, probes, custom evaluation, durable…
Use when property-service operations need an AI plus ontology plus DMAIC design for work orders, dispatch, quotes, evidence, CTQ…
Use when a personal or team operating system needs a bounded redesign using Four-C, closed-loop controls, 70/30 allocation, 3B…
Use when a goal must be converted into a repeatable behavior, cue, SOP, review cadence, and identity-aligned reinforcement.
Use when source material must be transformed into a compact, evidence-aware model for learning, decisions, or an Obsidian concept…
Use when a long-running agent task needs context budgeting, checkpointing, compaction, retrieval, or capability-based model…