agent-teams-command
Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require…
Use when projects or tasks need explicit state, WIP control, ownership, definitions of done, blocker handling, and verified closure.
$ npx -y skills add Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills --skill project-flow-ops --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/project-flow-opsContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use when projects or tasks need explicit state, WIP control, ownership, definitions of done, blocker handling, and verified closure.
name: project-flow-ops description: Use when projects or tasks need explicit state, WIP control, ownership, definitions of done, blocker handling, and verified closure. metadata: version: "8.1.0" updated: "2026-08-18" profile: "stateful" assumes: "Project state can be persisted and each active task can have one accountable owner." conflicts_with: "Hidden WIP, status by intuition, or marking work complete without a fresh verification receipt."
<skill_contract> <input>Project objective, tasks, owners, dependencies, budgets, artifacts, current states, and definitions of done.</input> <output>A WIP-limited project state with ranked work, explicit blockers, bounded actions, and verified closure receipts.</output> <done>Every active item has one owner and observable artifact, and completion is backed by its named fresh verification.</done> <non_goals>Hidden WIP, duplicate ownership, status by intuition, backlog accumulation, or completion without evidence.</non_goals>
Maintain a small, inspectable project state machine: `BACKLOG -> ACTIVE -> BLOCKED | COMPLETED`. Optimize flow and verified outcomes, not task volume.
Provide: project objective, current tasks, owners, dependencies, time budget, artifacts, and definition of done. Optional: prior review receipts.
<intake>
Normalize each item into `{id, objective, owner, state, artifact, definition_of_done, budget, dependencies}`. Reject duplicate ownership and distinguish waiting from active execution.
</intake>
<unknowns_gate>
If an active item lacks an owner, artifact, or observable definition of done, return `NEEDS_INPUT`. Probe the ambiguity with the largest impact on scheduling; do not guess priority from wording alone.
</unknowns_gate>
<execute>
1. Rank work by objective impact, urgency, dependency leverage, and cost of delay. 2. Limit `ACTIVE` to one or two items per owner. 3. Decompose the selected item until one bounded action can produce a reviewable artifact. 4. For a blocker, record owner, missing condition, evidence, next probe, and review time; move independent work forward. 5. Run the verification named in the definition of done. 6. Move to `COMPLETED` only with a fresh receipt; otherwise keep `ACTIVE` or `BLOCKED`. 7. At review, remove stale backlog items and state the next constraint.
</execute>
<evaluate>
Check state-transition legality, WIP limits, ownership, artifact existence, and completion evidence. Use an independent check for consequential deliverables. If verification fails, reopen the item with the failure evidence and smallest corrective action.
</evaluate>
<state_contract>
Persist `{run_id, status, attempt, budget, evidence, unknowns, last_error, next_action}` plus project objective, task ledger, dependency map, WIP count, transition history, and receipts. Transitions are append-only events; current state is derived from the latest valid event.
</state_contract>
Return `status`, `result` (project board and transition decisions), `evidence` (artifacts and receipts), `unknowns`, and `next_action` with owner and review time.
</skill_contract>
Verification-first Agent Skills for Codex OS, with optional compatibility adapters for Claude Code, Gemini, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require…
Use when designing or refactoring a model-native engineering workflow with bounded autonomy, probes, custom evaluation, durable…
Use when property-service operations need an AI plus ontology plus DMAIC design for work orders, dispatch, quotes, evidence, CTQ…
Use when a personal or team operating system needs a bounded redesign using Four-C, closed-loop controls, 70/30 allocation, 3B…
Use when a goal must be converted into a repeatable behavior, cue, SOP, review cadence, and identity-aligned reinforcement.
Use when source material must be transformed into a compact, evidence-aware model for learning, decisions, or an Obsidian concept…