idea-analogist
想法群聊室 — 类比者角色。被 idea-team 主编排器调用,或用户单独说"类比一下"、"别的行业有没有"、"yes-and 扩展"、"X 让你想到什么"、"跨界启示"时触发。**专门做跨界类比 + yes-and 扩展——不评判、不挑刺、不要求事实证据**。Do NOT use when 用户要数据(用…
Use when the user explicitly asks for $threads, Codex-native subagents, 开几个子 agent, or a GitHub issue/PR queue needing parallel lanes, worktrees, review/merge gates, and closure audit. Do not use for OS/language threads, chat/email/forum threads, or Assistants product threads
$ npx -y skills add majiayu000/spellbook --skill threads --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/threadsContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use when the user explicitly asks for $threads, Codex-native subagents, 开几个子 agent, or a GitHub issue/PR queue needing parallel lanes, worktrees, review/merge gates, and closure audit. Do not use for OS/language threads, chat/email/forum threads, or Assistants product threads
name: threads
description: Use when the user explicitly asks for $threads, Codex-native subagents, 开几个子 agent, or a GitHub issue/PR queue needing parallel lanes, worktrees, review/merge gates, and closure audit. Do not use for OS/language threads, chat/email/forum threads, or Assistants product threads unless Codex workflow orchestration is explicit.
compatibility: {runtimes: [codex]}Use this skill to turn a broad request into controlled Codex-native subthreads with explicit lanes, file ownership, review gates, and verifiable closure.
Native Codex threads are short-lived parallel work lines inside the Codex workflow. They are not the same as OMX/tmux workers. If native subagent tools are not visible, discover them with tool search. If no native subagent capability is available, produce the thread prompt pack and execution plan instead of pretending threads were launched.
1. Classify the request: `single_agent`, `plan_only`, `execute_direct`, `review_only`, `research_spec`, or `clarify_first`. 2. If the user explicitly asked for threads, record `intent_contract` and `thread_dispatch_gate`, write a `run_phase: preflight` record, and pass `append_run_log.py --validate-only` before spawning. 3. For GitHub queues, fetch remote state in the coordinator lane, then write `queue_gate`, `queue_ledger`, `issue_to_pr_map`, and the validated `queue_bounds`. 4. Write a lane map with file ownership, verification owner, stop conditions, context budget, and output firewall. 5. Route large command output to artifacts before dispatch; the parent reads only summaries, short tails, targeted greps, and evidence paths. 6. Dispatch only bounded native lanes with disjoint writable scopes or read-only roles. 7. Collect, wait, and close spawned agents; do not count the coordinator as a spawned thread. 8. Run fresh verification tied to the current head or artifact. 9. End with a compact final report and `threads_run_log`; write durable JSONL for queue, multi-lane, push, comment, or merge-capable runs.
Do not use this skill for generic uses of "thread" unless the user explicitly means Codex workflow orchestration:
Choose one mode:
Use `single_agent` only for one-file fixes, simple questions, or tasks where the next step depends on one immediate result. If the user explicitly asks for threads, subagents, or a GitHub issue/PR queue and native subagents are available, do not silently choose `single_agent`; record a concrete `no_spawn_reason` before implementation work begins.
For any implementation mode, start with a lane map before spawning workers. For GitHub issue/PR queues, complete the Capability Gate and Queue Gate first; do not create worker lanes until `capability_gate`, `queue_gate`, `queue_ledger`, and `issue_to_pr_map` are written.
When the user explicitly asks for threads, subagents, "开几个子 agent", or a GitHub issue/PR queue that the skill classifies as `plan_only`, `execute_direct`, `review_only`, or `research_spec`, native dispatch is required whenever native subagent tools are available.
Record this gate before implementation, review, or merge work:
thread_dispatch_gate:
- explicit_thread_request: yes | no
- native_subagents: available | unavailable
- spawn_requirement: required | optional | unavailable
- fallback_mode: single_agent | prompt_pack_only | none
- planned_native_threads:
- id:
role:
target:
write_scope: read_only | disjoint_writable | none
spawn_status: planned | spawned | skipped
no_spawn_reason:
- native_thread_evidence:
user_requested_native_threads: yes | no
spawned_agents:
- lane_id:
spawn_tool:
agent_id_or_thread_id:
wait_evidence:
close_evidence:
result_collected: yes | no
fallback_reason:
- no_spawn_reason:Rules:
Cross-runtime skills for Claude Code, Codex, and multi-agent workflows.
Repo: majiayu000/spellbook
想法群聊室 — 类比者角色。被 idea-team 主编排器调用,或用户单独说"类比一下"、"别的行业有没有"、"yes-and 扩展"、"X 让你想到什么"、"跨界启示"时触发。**专门做跨界类比 + yes-and 扩展——不评判、不挑刺、不要求事实证据**。Do NOT use when 用户要数据(用…
想法群聊室 — 反方角色。被 idea-team 主编排器调用,或用户单独说"反方意见"、"挑这个想法的刺"、"为什么会失败"、"找漏洞 / 反例"、"devil's advocate"时触发。**专门挑漏洞、找隐藏假设、给反例——不安慰、不"也许可以这样"、不全盘否定**。Do NOT use when…
想法群聊室 — 调研员角色。被 idea-team 主编排器调用,或用户单独说"调研一下 X"、"X 的现状/竞品/数据"、"找 2026 数据"、"事实底"时触发。**用 WebSearch 拉真实 2026 数据、列竞品、引来源——只给事实,不评判,不建议**。Do NOT use when…
想法群聊室主持人 — 把一句话想法丢给多角色 AI 团队(调研员/反方/类比者)做查漏补缺。每个角色有自己的 voice,他们互相 @ 接话;你随时插话。**这是创意扩展工具,不打分、不否决、不堵路**。Use when 用户说"组个团队聊一下"、"开会讨论这个想法"、"找几个角度看看"、"群聊一下 X"、"team…
端到端产品教练 — 把一句话想法走到 PRD + 可点击 HTML 原型。会顶嘴、强制砍功能、用 Nielsen + Norman 做友好性硬检。Use when user 说"我有一个想法"、"想做一个产品"、"做 MVP"、"写 PRD"、"做用户友好的产品",或调用插件命令…
Mobile app UI design expert for iOS and Android. Use when designing app interfaces, creating design systems, ensuring accessibility, or following platform…