idea-analogist
想法群聊室 — 类比者角色。被 idea-team 主编排器调用,或用户单独说"类比一下"、"别的行业有没有"、"yes-and 扩展"、"X 让你想到什么"、"跨界启示"时触发。**专门做跨界类比 + yes-and 扩展——不评判、不挑刺、不要求事实证据**。Do NOT use when 用户要数据(用…
Product discovery and market research expert. Use when validating product ideas, conducting market research, user interviews, competitive analysis, or opportunity assessment. Covers JTBD, Kano model, and Value Proposition Canvas.
$ npx -y skills add majiayu000/spellbook --skill product-discovery --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/product-discoveryContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Product discovery and market research expert. Use when validating product ideas, conducting market research, user interviews, competitive analysis, or opportunity assessment. Covers JTBD, Kano model, and Value Proposition Canvas.
name: product-discovery description: Product discovery and market research expert. Use when validating product ideas, conducting market research, user interviews, competitive analysis, or opportunity assessment. Covers JTBD, Kano model, and Value Proposition Canvas.
---
> These rules are mandatory. Violating them means the skill is not working correctly.
**Never start with a solution. Always define the problem and outcome first.**
❌ FORBIDDEN: "We should build a search bar for the product page" "Let's add AI recommendations" "Users need a mobile app" ✅ REQUIRED: "Problem: Users can't find products (40% exit rate on catalog) Outcome: Reduce exit rate to 20% Possible solutions: 1. Search bar with filters 2. AI-powered recommendations 3. Better category navigation 4. Visual product browsing"
**Never assume user needs without evidence from real user research.**
❌ FORBIDDEN: - "Users probably want X" (assumption without data) - "Our competitor has X, so we need it too" (copycat without validation) - "The CEO thinks we should build X" (HiPPO without evidence) - "It's obvious users need X" (intuition without validation) ✅ REQUIRED: - "5 out of 8 interviewed users mentioned X as a pain point" - "Analytics show 60% of users abandon at step 3" - "Prototype test: 7/10 users completed task successfully" - "Survey (n=500): 45% rated feature as 'must have'"
**Never validate a problem with fewer than 5 user interviews per segment.**
❌ FORBIDDEN: - "We talked to 2 users and they loved the idea" - "One customer requested this feature" - "Based on a quick chat with sales..." ✅ REQUIRED: | Segment | Interviews | Key Finding | |---------|------------|-------------| | Power Users | 6 | 5/6 struggle with X | | New Users | 5 | 4/5 drop off at onboarding | | Churned | 5 | 3/5 cited missing feature Y | Minimum per segment: 5 interviews Confidence increases with more interviews
**Every assumption must be testable and falsifiable with clear success criteria.**
❌ FORBIDDEN: - "Users will like the new design" (not falsifiable) - "This will improve engagement" (no success criteria) - "The feature will be useful" (vague) ✅ REQUIRED: | Assumption | Test | Success Criteria | Result | |------------|------|------------------|--------| | Users will complete onboarding in new flow | Prototype test with 10 users | >70% completion | TBD | | Users prefer visual search | A/B test | >10% lift in conversions | TBD | | Price point is acceptable | Landing page test | >3% conversion | TBD |
---
| Scenario | Framework/Tool | Output | |----------|---------------|--------| | Validate product idea | Product Opportunity Assessment | Go/no-go decision | | Size market opportunity | TAM/SAM/SOM | Market size estimates | | Understand user needs | User Research (interviews, surveys) | User insights, pain points | | Analyze competition | Competitive Analysis | Competitive landscape map | | Discover user motivations | Jobs-to-be-Done (JTBD) | Job stories, outcomes | | Prioritize features | Kano Model | Feature categorization | | Define value proposition | Value Proposition Canvas | Value prop statement | | Test product concept | Lean Startup / MVP | Validated learnings | | Map opportunities | Opportunity Solution Tree | Prioritized opportunities |
---
Discovery is led by three roles working together weekly:
Product Manager → Defines outcomes, owns roadmap Designer → Explores solutions, tests usability Engineer → Assesses feasibility, proposes technical solutions
## 1. Customer Interviews (Weekly) - Schedule 3-5 interviews per week minimum - Mix of current users, churned users, prospects - Focus on understanding problems, not pitching solutions - Record and share insights with team ## 2. Assumption Testing (Weekly) - Identify riskiest assumptions about solutions - Design quick tests (prototypes, landing pages, fake doors) - Run experiments with real users - Measure results against success criteria ## 3. Opportunity Mapping (Ongoing) - Build opportunity solution tree - Map customer needs to potential solutions - Prioritize based on impact and feasibility - Update as you learn
Discovery (What to Build) Delivery (How to Build It) ├─ Customer interviews ├─ Sprint planning ├─ Prototype testing ├─ Development ├─ Assumption validation ├─ QA testing ├─ Market research ├─ Deployment └─ Opportunity assessment └─ Post-launch monitoring Key difference: Discovery reduces risk BEFORE committing to build
---
Before starting any product initiative, answer these questions:
## 1. Problem Definition **What problem are we solving?** - Be specific and measurable - Validate it's a real problem (not assumed) ## 2. Target Market **For whom are we solving this problem?** - Define specific user segments - Size the addressable market (TAM/SAM/SOM) ## 3. Opportunity Size **How big is the opportunity?** - Revenue potential - User growth potential - Strategic value ## 4. Success Metrics **How will we me
Cross-runtime skills for Claude Code, Codex, and multi-agent workflows.
Repo: majiayu000/spellbook
想法群聊室 — 类比者角色。被 idea-team 主编排器调用,或用户单独说"类比一下"、"别的行业有没有"、"yes-and 扩展"、"X 让你想到什么"、"跨界启示"时触发。**专门做跨界类比 + yes-and 扩展——不评判、不挑刺、不要求事实证据**。Do NOT use when 用户要数据(用…
想法群聊室 — 反方角色。被 idea-team 主编排器调用,或用户单独说"反方意见"、"挑这个想法的刺"、"为什么会失败"、"找漏洞 / 反例"、"devil's advocate"时触发。**专门挑漏洞、找隐藏假设、给反例——不安慰、不"也许可以这样"、不全盘否定**。Do NOT use when…
想法群聊室 — 调研员角色。被 idea-team 主编排器调用,或用户单独说"调研一下 X"、"X 的现状/竞品/数据"、"找 2026 数据"、"事实底"时触发。**用 WebSearch 拉真实 2026 数据、列竞品、引来源——只给事实,不评判,不建议**。Do NOT use when…
想法群聊室主持人 — 把一句话想法丢给多角色 AI 团队(调研员/反方/类比者)做查漏补缺。每个角色有自己的 voice,他们互相 @ 接话;你随时插话。**这是创意扩展工具,不打分、不否决、不堵路**。Use when 用户说"组个团队聊一下"、"开会讨论这个想法"、"找几个角度看看"、"群聊一下 X"、"team…
端到端产品教练 — 把一句话想法走到 PRD + 可点击 HTML 原型。会顶嘴、强制砍功能、用 Nielsen + Norman 做友好性硬检。Use when user 说"我有一个想法"、"想做一个产品"、"做 MVP"、"写 PRD"、"做用户友好的产品",或调用插件命令…
Mobile app UI design expert for iOS and Android. Use when designing app interfaces, creating design systems, ensuring accessibility, or following platform…