cheat-on-content
给所有想把"感觉"变成可校准预测的内容创作者。**方法论通用**——打分 → 盲预测 → T+3d 复盘 → 进化 rubric 的循环适用任何能被量化(播放 / 阅读 / 收听 / 点击)的内容。**rubric 是循环的内容,不是循环本身**——当前内置一份观点视频 rubric(参考博主 25+…
6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.
$ npx -y skills add LiHongwei-cn/lihongwei-cn --skill ai-engineering-toolkit --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/ai-engineering-toolkitContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.
name: ai-engineering-toolkit description: "6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching." category: data-ai risk: offensive source: community date_added: "2026-03-15" author: viliawang-pm tags: [prompt-engineering, rag, security, evaluation, ai-engineering, llm] tools: [claude, cursor, gemini, copilot]
A collection of 6 structured, expert-level workflows that turn your AI coding assistant into a senior AI engineering partner. Each skill encodes a repeatable methodology — not just "ask AI to help," but a step-by-step decision framework with quantitative scoring, checklists, and decision trees.
The key difference from ad-hoc AI assistance: **every workflow produces consistent, reproducible results** regardless of who runs it or when. You can use the scoring systems as team baselines and write them into CI/CD pipelines.
Scores prompts across 8 dimensions (Clarity, Specificity, Completeness, Conciseness, Structure, Grounding, Safety, Robustness) on a 1-10 scale with weighted aggregation to a 0-100 score. Identifies the 3 weakest dimensions, generates targeted rewrites, and re-evaluates. Supports single prompt, A/B comparison, and batch evaluation modes.
Analyzes token distribution across 5 context zones (System, Few-shot, User input, Retrieval, Output) and produces an optimized allocation plan. Includes a compression strategy decision tree for each zone. Common finding: output zone squeezed to under 6% — this skill catches that before truncation happens.
Walks through a complete architecture decision tree: document format → parsing strategy → chunking approach (fixed/semantic/recursive) → embedding model selection → retrieval method (vector/keyword/hybrid) → evaluation metrics (Faithfulness, Relevancy, Context Precision). Covers Naive RAG, Advanced RAG, and Modular RAG patterns.
> **⚠️ AUTHORIZED USE ONLY** > This skill is for educational purposes or authorized security assessments only. > You must have explicit, written permission from the system owner before using this tool. > Misuse of this tool is illegal and strictly prohibited.
Executes a 65-point red-team audit across 5 attack categories: direct prompt injection, indirect prompt injection (via RAG documents), information extraction (system prompt / API key leakage), tool abuse (SQL injection, path traversal, command injection), and goal hijacking. The AI constructs adversarial test prompts for evaluation purposes, asks the user for confirmation before each test phase, judges pass/fail, and generates fix recommendations. All tests are contained within the evaluation context and do not interact with external systems. It is recommended to run audits in a sandboxed environment (Docker/VM).
Designs evaluation metric systems for LLM applications. Includes LLM-as-Judge scoring framework with bias mitigation strategies (position bias, verbosity bias, self-enhancement bias). Outputs CI/CD-ready evaluation pipeline templates.
A 5-phase guided conversation framework: dig into motivation → assess market opportunity → find the path → design scenarios → analyze competition. Useful for thinking through "should we build this?" before writing any code.
Ask: "Evaluate this system prompt"
You are a customer support agent. Help users with their questions. Be nice and helpful.
Result: Overall score **28/100**. Weakest dimensions: Safety (1/10, zero injection protection), Specificity (2/10, no output format), Structure (2/10, no sections). Auto-rewrite scores **82/100** with added scope boundaries, response format, escalation rules, and safety guardrails.
Ask: "Run a security audit on my customer support agent"
Result: 65 tests executed. 3 critical failures found: Base64-encoded instruction bypass, path traversal via tool calls, system prompt extraction via role-play. Fix recommendations provided for each.
MUNDO - THE EMPEROR. Complete AI orchestration system with 1208 skills, 25 capability modules, self-evolving, collective consciousness. GitHub Actions 24/7 automation.
Repo: LiHongwei-cn/lihongwei-cn
给所有想把"感觉"变成可校准预测的内容创作者。**方法论通用**——打分 → 盲预测 → T+3d 复盘 → 进化 rubric 的循环适用任何能被量化(播放 / 阅读 / 收听 / 点击)的内容。**rubric 是循环的内容,不是循环本身**——当前内置一份观点视频 rubric(参考博主 25+…
提议并执行 rubric 或 bucket 升级。两种模式:**完整 rubric bump**(最高风险动作,5 步强制 + 跨模型审核)和 **--bucket-only 轻量重校**(只换 bucket 边界,不动 rubric 公式)。**Phase 2 强制走 cheat-score-blind…
cheat-on-content 的首次 onboarding 与脚手架创建器。统一流程——所有用户都走相同 5 阶段闭环,唯一区别是"发过视频的人"会在 init 时多一步:抓取已有视频建立历史 context(用于后续 cheat-seed 给更贴合的选题、更准的…
从对标账号导入 script + 数据 → 拆 pattern + 派生 base rubric 信号 → 写到 benchmark.md / script_patterns.md / rubric_notes.md。**这是工具最早期信号的来源**——cold-start…
把老用户的 .cheat-state.json 升级到当前 schema_version。读 migrations/registry.md 算迁移链,按顺序应用每一步迁移文件。幂等:跑两次结果一样。失败停在中间版本不前进。触发词:"迁移"/"升级 state"/"migrate"/"我的 state…
从复盘评论数据派生 / 刷新账号的受众画像,写入 audience.md。这是和 rubric 平行的第二个派生物——rubric 答"怎么打分",persona 答"谁在看"。cheat-seed 选题 / 写稿时读它。**audience.md 含实绩信号,cheat-score-blind…