cheat-on-content
给所有想把"感觉"变成可校准预测的内容创作者。**方法论通用**——打分 → 盲预测 → T+3d 复盘 → 进化 rubric 的循环适用任何能被量化(播放 / 阅读 / 收听 / 点击)的内容。**rubric 是循环的内容,不是循环本身**——当前内置一份观点视频 rubric(参考博主 25+…
Audit local AI coding-agent sessions with agenttrace for cost, tool failures, latency, anomalies, health, diffs, and CI gates.
$ npx -y skills add LiHongwei-cn/lihongwei-cn --skill agenttrace-session-audit --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/agenttrace-session-auditContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Audit local AI coding-agent sessions with agenttrace for cost, tool failures, latency, anomalies, health, diffs, and CI gates.
name: agenttrace-session-audit description: "Audit local AI coding-agent sessions with agenttrace for cost, tool failures, latency, anomalies, health, diffs, and CI gates." category: development risk: safe source: community source_repo: luoyuctl/agenttrace source_type: community date_added: "2026-05-10" author: luoyuctl tags: [ai-coding, observability, cost-tracking, session-analysis] tools: [claude, cursor, gemini, codex-cli] license: "MIT" license_source: "https://github.com/luoyuctl/agenttrace/blob/master/LICENSE"
Use this skill to inspect local AI coding-agent sessions with [agenttrace](https://github.com/luoyuctl/agenttrace). It focuses on the process behind a run: token and cost spikes, tool failures, retry loops, latency gaps, anomalies, health scores, and session-to-session diffs.
agenttrace is local-first and reads session logs from tools such as Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Aider, Cursor exports, OpenCode, Qwen Code, Kimi, and generic JSON or JSONL traces.
Prefer an installed `agenttrace` binary when it is available on `PATH`. If the current repository is `luoyuctl/agenttrace`, use `go run ./cmd/agenttrace` instead.
agenttrace --doctor agenttrace --overview
If no sessions are detected, report the directories checked by `--doctor` and ask for the exported session file or log directory.
Use Markdown when the user wants a concise report they can inspect or share.
agenttrace --overview -f markdown -o agenttrace-overview.md
In the report, lead with the highest-risk sessions and explain why they matter: critical anomalies, repeated tool failures, token or cost waste, long latency gaps, low health scores, and suspiciously shallow sessions.
Use the latest session for a quick check, or pass an explicit export path when the user provides one.
agenttrace --latest agenttrace --latest -f json agenttrace path/to/session-or-export.json agenttrace --overview -d path/to/session-dir
Token and latency metrics can look healthy even when an agent confidently takes the wrong implementation path. When the risk is semantic drift, pair the trace audit with a diff against a previous or known-good attempt.
Look for:
For CI or repeatable team workflows, use JSON output or health thresholds.
agenttrace --overview -f json -o agenttrace-overview.json agenttrace --overview --fail-under-health 80 --fail-on-critical --max-tool-fail-rate 15
Tune thresholds to the project. A strict gate is useful for critical workflows; a reporting-only command is better while the team is learning its baseline.
agenttrace --overview agenttrace --latest
Use this after a long coding-agent run to decide whether the next prompt should split the task, avoid a failing tool path, add missing tests, or reset context.
agenttrace --overview --fail-under-health 80 --fail-on-critical
Use this when agent session logs are available in CI and the team wants a simple guard against critical anomalies or unhealthy runs.
**Solution:** Run `agenttrace --doctor`, then point agenttrace at the exported file or log directory.
**Solution:** Compare the session against a prior attempt or known-good diff; cost metrics alone will miss semantic drift.
**Solution:** Start with JSON or Markdown reporting, inspect normal baselines, then tighten thresholds gradually.
MUNDO - THE EMPEROR. Complete AI orchestration system with 1208 skills, 25 capability modules, self-evolving, collective consciousness. GitHub Actions 24/7 automation.
Repo: LiHongwei-cn/lihongwei-cn
给所有想把"感觉"变成可校准预测的内容创作者。**方法论通用**——打分 → 盲预测 → T+3d 复盘 → 进化 rubric 的循环适用任何能被量化(播放 / 阅读 / 收听 / 点击)的内容。**rubric 是循环的内容,不是循环本身**——当前内置一份观点视频 rubric(参考博主 25+…
提议并执行 rubric 或 bucket 升级。两种模式:**完整 rubric bump**(最高风险动作,5 步强制 + 跨模型审核)和 **--bucket-only 轻量重校**(只换 bucket 边界,不动 rubric 公式)。**Phase 2 强制走 cheat-score-blind…
cheat-on-content 的首次 onboarding 与脚手架创建器。统一流程——所有用户都走相同 5 阶段闭环,唯一区别是"发过视频的人"会在 init 时多一步:抓取已有视频建立历史 context(用于后续 cheat-seed 给更贴合的选题、更准的…
从对标账号导入 script + 数据 → 拆 pattern + 派生 base rubric 信号 → 写到 benchmark.md / script_patterns.md / rubric_notes.md。**这是工具最早期信号的来源**——cold-start…
把老用户的 .cheat-state.json 升级到当前 schema_version。读 migrations/registry.md 算迁移链,按顺序应用每一步迁移文件。幂等:跑两次结果一样。失败停在中间版本不前进。触发词:"迁移"/"升级 state"/"migrate"/"我的 state…
从复盘评论数据派生 / 刷新账号的受众画像,写入 audience.md。这是和 rubric 平行的第二个派生物——rubric 答"怎么打分",persona 答"谁在看"。cheat-seed 选题 / 写稿时读它。**audience.md 含实绩信号,cheat-score-blind…