/agent-orchestration-improve-agent

name: agent-orchestration-improve-agent
description: "Systematic improvement of existing agents through performance analysis, prompt engineering, and continuous iteration."
risk: unknown
source: community
date_added: "2026-02-27"

Agent Performance Optimization Workflow

Systematic improvement of existing agents through performance analysis, prompt engineering, and continuous iteration.

[Extended thinking: Agent optimization requires a data-driven approach combining performance metrics, user feedback analysis, and advanced prompt engineering techniques. Success depends on systematic evaluation, targeted improvements, and rigorous testing with rollback capabilities for production safety.]

Use this skill when

• Improving an existing agent's performance or reliability
• Analyzing failure modes, prompt quality, or tool usage
• Running structured A/B tests or evaluation suites
• Designing iterative optimization workflows for agents

Do not use this skill when

• You are building a brand-new agent from scratch
• There are no metrics, feedback, or test cases available
• The task is unrelated to agent performance or prompt quality

Instructions

1. Establish baseline metrics and collect representative examples. 2. Identify failure modes and prioritize high-impact fixes. 3. Apply prompt and workflow improvements with measurable goals. 4. Validate with tests and roll out changes in controlled stages.

Safety

• Avoid deploying prompt changes without regression testing.
• Roll back quickly if quality or safety metrics regress.

Phase 1: Performance Analysis and Baseline Metrics

Comprehensive analysis of agent performance using context-manager for historical data collection.

1.1 Gather Performance Data

Use: context-manager
Command: analyze-agent-performance $ARGUMENTS --days 30

Collect metrics including:

• Task completion rate (successful vs failed tasks)
• Response accuracy and factual correctness
• Tool usage efficiency (correct tools, call frequency)
• Average response time and token consumption
• User satisfaction indicators (corrections, retries)
• Hallucination incidents and error patterns

1.2 User Feedback Pattern Analysis

Identify recurring patterns in user interactions:

• **Correction patterns**: Where users consistently modify outputs
• **Clarification requests**: Common areas of ambiguity
• **Task abandonment**: Points where users give up
• **Follow-up questions**: Indicators of incomplete responses
• **Positive feedback**: Successful patterns to preserve

1.3 Failure Mode Classification

Categorize failures by root cause:

• **Instruction misunderstanding**: Role or task confusion
• **Output format errors**: Structure or formatting issues
• **Context loss**: Long conversation degradation
• **Tool misuse**: Incorrect or inefficient tool selection
• **Constraint violations**: Safety or business rule breaches
• **Edge case handling**: Unusual input scenarios

1.4 Baseline Performance Report

Generate quantitative baseline metrics:

Performance Baseline:
- Task Success Rate: [X%]
- Average Corrections per Task: [Y]
- Tool Call Efficiency: [Z%]
- User Satisfaction Score: [1-10]
- Average Response Latency: [Xms]
- Token Efficiency Ratio: [X:Y]

Phase 2: Prompt Engineering Improvements

Apply advanced prompt optimization techniques using prompt-engineer agent.

2.1 Chain-of-Thought Enhancement

Implement structured reasoning patterns:

Use: prompt-engineer
Technique: chain-of-thought-optimization

• Add explicit reasoning steps: "Let's approach this step-by-step..."
• Include self-verification checkpoints: "Before proceeding, verify that..."
• Implement recursive decomposition for complex tasks
• Add reasoning trace visibility for debugging

2.2 Few-Shot Example Optimization

Curate high-quality examples from successful interactions:

• **Select diverse examples** covering common use cases
• **Include edge cases** that previously failed
• **Show both positive and negative examples** with explanations
• **Order examples** from simple to complex
• **Annotate examples** with key decision points

Example structure:

Good Example:
Input: [User request]
Reasoning: [Step-by-step thought process]
Output: [Successful response]
Why this works: [Key success factors]

Bad Example:
Input: [Similar request]
Output: [Failed response]
Why this fails: [Specific issues]
Correct approach: [Fixed version]

2.3 Role Definition Refinement

Strengthen agent identity and capabilities:

• **Core purpose**: Clear, single-sentence mission
• **Expertise domains**: Specific knowledge areas
• **Behavioral traits**: Personality and interaction style
• **Tool proficiency**: Available tools and when to use them
• **Constraints**: What the agent should NOT do
• **Success criteria**: How to measure task completion

2.4 Constitutional AI Integration

Implement self-correction mechanisms:

Constitutional Principles:
1. Verify factual accuracy before responding
2. Self-check for potential biases or harmful content
3. Validate output format matches requirements
4. Ensure response completeness
5. Maintain consistency with previous responses

Add critique-and-revise loops:

• Initial response generation
• Self-critique against principles
• Automatic revision if issues detected
• Final validation before output

2.5 Output Format Tuning

Optimize response structure:

• **Structured templates** for common tasks
• **Dynamic formatting** based on complexity
• **Progressive disclosure** for detailed information
• **Markdown optimization** for readability
• **Code block formatting** with syntax highlighting
• **Table and list generation** for data presentation

Phase 3: Testing and Validation

Comprehensive testing framework with A/B comparison.

3.1 Test Suite Development

Create representative test scenarios:

Test Categories:
1. Golden path scenarios (common successful cases)
2. Previously failed tasks (regression