cheat-on-content
给所有想把"感觉"变成可校准预测的内容创作者。**方法论通用**——打分 → 盲预测 → T+3d 复盘 → 进化 rubric 的循环适用任何能被量化(播放 / 阅读 / 收听 / 点击)的内容。**rubric 是循环的内容,不是循环本身**——当前内置一份观点视频 rubric(参考博主 25+…
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing,
$ npx -y skills add LiHongwei-cn/lihongwei-cn --skill agent-evaluation --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/agent-evaluationContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing,
name: agent-evaluation description: Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks risk: safe source: vibeship-spawner-skills (Apache 2.0) date_added: 2026-02-27
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks
Run tests multiple times and analyze result distributions
**When to use**: Evaluating stochastic agent behavior
interface TestResult { testId: string; runId: string; passed: boolean; score: number; // 0-1 for partial credit latencyMs: number; tokensUsed: number; output: string; expectedBehaviors: string[]; actualBehaviors: string[]; }
interface StatisticalAnalysis { passRate: number; confidence95: [number, number]; meanScore: number; stdDevScore: number; meanLatency: number; p95Latency: number; behaviorConsistency: number; }
class StatisticalEvaluator { private readonly minRuns = 10; private readonly confidenceLevel = 0.95;
async evaluateAgent( agent: Agent, testSuite: TestCase[] ): Promise<EvaluationReport> { const results: TestResult[] = [];
// Run each test multiple times for (const test of testSuite) { for (let run = 0; run < this.minRuns; run++) { const result = await this.runTest(agent, test, run); results.push(result); } }
// Analyze by test const byTest = this.groupByTest(results); const testAnalyses = new Map<string, StatisticalAnalysis>();
for (const [testId, testResults] of byTest) { testAnalyses.set(testId, this.analyzeResults(testResults)); }
// Overall analysis const overall = this.analyzeResults(results);
return { overall, byTest: testAnalyses, concerns: this.identifyConcerns(testAnalyses), recommendations: this.generateRecommendations(testAnalyses) }; }
private analyzeResults(results: TestResult[]): StatisticalAnalysis { const passes = results.filter(r => r.passed); const passRate = passes.length / results.length;
// Calculate confidence interval for pass rate const z = 1.96; // 95% confidence const se = Math.sqrt((passRate * (1 - passRate)) / results.length); const confidence95: [number, number] = [ Math.max(0, passRate - z * se), Math.min(1, passRate + z * se) ];
const scores = results.map(r => r.score); const latencies = results.map(r => r.latencyMs);
return { passRate, confidence95, meanScore: this.mean(scores), stdDevScore: this.stdDev(scores), meanLatency: this.mean(latencies), p95Latency: this.percentile(latencies, 95), behaviorConsistency: this.calculateConsistency(results) }; }
private calculateConsistency(results: TestResult[]): number { // How consistent are the behaviors across runs? if (results.length < 2) return 1;
const behaviorSets = results.map(r => new Set(r.actualBehaviors)); let consistencySum = 0; let comparisons = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < behaviorSets.length; i++) { for (let j = i + 1; j < behaviorSets.length; j++) { const intersection = new Set( [...behaviorSets[i]].filter(x => behaviorSets[j].has(x)) ); const union = new Set([...behaviorSets[i], ...behaviorSets[j]]); consistencySum += intersection.size / union.size; comparisons++; } }
return consistencySum / comparisons; }
private identifyConcerns(analyses: Map<string, StatisticalAnalysis>): Concern[] { const concerns: Concern[] = [];
for (const [testId, analysis] of analyses) { if (analysis.passRate < 0.8) { concerns.push({ testId, type: 'low_pass_rate', severity: analysis.passRate < 0.5 ? 'critical' : 'high', message: `Pass rate ${(analysis.passRate * 100).toFixed(1)}% below threshold` }); }
if (analysis.behaviorConsistency < 0.7) { concerns.push({ testId, type: 'inconsistent_behavior', severity: 'high', message: `Behavior consistency ${(analysis.behaviorConsistency *
MUNDO - THE EMPEROR. Complete AI orchestration system with 1208 skills, 25 capability modules, self-evolving, collective consciousness. GitHub Actions 24/7 automation.
Repo: LiHongwei-cn/lihongwei-cn
给所有想把"感觉"变成可校准预测的内容创作者。**方法论通用**——打分 → 盲预测 → T+3d 复盘 → 进化 rubric 的循环适用任何能被量化(播放 / 阅读 / 收听 / 点击)的内容。**rubric 是循环的内容,不是循环本身**——当前内置一份观点视频 rubric(参考博主 25+…
提议并执行 rubric 或 bucket 升级。两种模式:**完整 rubric bump**(最高风险动作,5 步强制 + 跨模型审核)和 **--bucket-only 轻量重校**(只换 bucket 边界,不动 rubric 公式)。**Phase 2 强制走 cheat-score-blind…
cheat-on-content 的首次 onboarding 与脚手架创建器。统一流程——所有用户都走相同 5 阶段闭环,唯一区别是"发过视频的人"会在 init 时多一步:抓取已有视频建立历史 context(用于后续 cheat-seed 给更贴合的选题、更准的…
从对标账号导入 script + 数据 → 拆 pattern + 派生 base rubric 信号 → 写到 benchmark.md / script_patterns.md / rubric_notes.md。**这是工具最早期信号的来源**——cold-start…
把老用户的 .cheat-state.json 升级到当前 schema_version。读 migrations/registry.md 算迁移链,按顺序应用每一步迁移文件。幂等:跑两次结果一样。失败停在中间版本不前进。触发词:"迁移"/"升级 state"/"migrate"/"我的 state…
从复盘评论数据派生 / 刷新账号的受众画像,写入 audience.md。这是和 rubric 平行的第二个派生物——rubric 答"怎么打分",persona 答"谁在看"。cheat-seed 选题 / 写稿时读它。**audience.md 含实绩信号,cheat-score-blind…