academic-writing
Write or revise thesis and paper prose section by section (abstract, introduction, related work, method, results, discussion, conclusion) with the conventions…
Turn a topic to learn into a sequenced study plan with a goal test, prerequisites, ordered units with one primary resource each, spaced practice and retrieval, a project that proves the skill, and weekly time boxes that fit the learner's calendar; then track progress against it.
$ npx -y skills add KhaledSaeed18/dotclaude --skill learning-plan --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/learning-planContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Turn a topic to learn into a sequenced study plan with a goal test, prerequisites, ordered units with one primary resource each, spaced practice and retrieval, a project that proves the skill, and weekly time boxes that fit the learner's calendar; then track progress against it.
name: learning-plan description: "Turn a topic to learn into a sequenced study plan with a goal test, prerequisites, ordered units with one primary resource each, spaced practice and retrieval, a project that proves the skill, and weekly time boxes that fit the learner's calendar; then track progress against it. Works for a technology, a research field, or a course. Use when starting to learn something for a thesis, a job, or a project, when a learning effort has stalled, or when the resource list is long and the order is unclear." argument-hint: "the topic, the goal (what you should be able to do), current level, and hours per week"
Learning fails from three causes: no clear end state, resources consumed in the wrong order, and no retrieval practice. A plan fixes all three before the first hour is spent. The plan is measured by what the learner can do, not by what they have read.
Write the goal as something the learner will do at the end, observable and dated: "By 30 Nov, implement and evaluate a retrieval-augmented pipeline on my thesis dataset and explain each design choice to my supervisor." If the stated goal is "understand X", ask what they would do with the understanding until it becomes a task.
Derive the sub-skills the test requires (usually four to eight). These are the units.
Current level per sub-skill (none, some, working, solid), from what they say and, when possible, a two-minute probe question per unit. Prerequisites missing become the first units. Skip what is already solid; a plan that re-teaches the known is abandoned by week two.
One **primary** resource per unit (a chapter, a course module, a paper, official docs), chosen for being the canonical or best-explained source, not the most popular. One **practice** source per unit (exercises, a small build, a dataset). Optional **reference** links. No unit has more than three resources; the learner should never be choosing what to read.
For a research field: the survey paper first, then the two or three foundational papers, then the recent ones from `literature-search`; `paper-reader` for the notes.
Order units by dependency, then by usefulness to the goal. Assign each a time box (hours) from the learner's weekly budget, with 20% slack. Interleave: a week never contains only reading. Each week has:
A project that requires every unit and produces an artifact (a working tool, an analysis with figures, a written explanation for a specific reader). For a thesis, the capstone is a piece of the thesis itself (the pilot experiment, the literature notes for one chapter). The plan is done when the capstone passes the goal test.
`LEARNING_PLAN.md` (or the path asked for):
# Learning plan: retrieval-augmented generation for the thesis Goal test (by 2026-11-30): ... Budget: 6 h/week, 10 weeks. Current level: Python solid, ML basics working, IR none, vector DBs none. ## Units 1. Information retrieval basics (prereq) | 4 h | primary: Manning IIR ch. 1, 6 | practice: BM25 over 1k docs by hand 2. Embeddings and vector search | 6 h | primary: ... | practice: ... ... ## Schedule | Week | Learn | Practice | Retrieve | Build | | 1 | U1 | BM25 | - | scaffold repo, load dataset | | 2 | U2 | embed 1k docs | U1 | ... | ... ## Capstone ... ## Progress - [ ] U1 learned [ ] U1 practised [ ] retrieved 1d/1w/1m
When asked for progress, read the checkboxes and the dates, compare with the schedule, and adjust: drop a unit that turned out unnecessary, add one the capstone revealed, move the slack. A plan that is never revised is a wish.
Reusable Claude Code extension registry. skills, subagents, slash commands, and hooks for engineering, git, testing, and security workflows. Distributed as a shadcn GitHub registry and as installable plugins.
Write or revise thesis and paper prose section by section (abstract, introduction, related work, method, results, discussion, conclusion) with the conventions…
Report computational benchmarks and experimental comparisons the way examiners and reviewers expect: fair baselines run under the same conditions, multiple…
Maintain the thesis .bib file as a single source of truth: fetch verified BibTeX from a DOI, arXiv id, or title via CrossRef and arXiv, normalise citation keys…
Expand a set of key papers into the literature around them by walking the citation graph with the Semantic Scholar and OpenAlex APIs: backward (references),…
Audit every citation in a chapter, paper, or proposal against the .bib file and the real world: each cite key must exist, each entry must resolve to a live DOI…
Structure a thesis whose contribution is a built artifact (tool, system, method, model) using design science research: explicit problem and requirements,…