/writing-skills

name: writing-skills
description: Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment
source_repo: "obra/superpowers"
source_url: "https://github.com/obra/superpowers"
source_license: "MIT"
origin: aggregated
language: en

Writing Skills

Overview

**Writing skills IS Test-Driven Development applied to process documentation.**

**Personal skills live in agent-specific directories (`~/.claude/skills` for Claude Code, `~/.agents/skills/` for Codex)**

You write test cases (pressure scenarios with subagents), watch them fail (baseline behavior), write the skill (documentation), watch tests pass (agents comply), and refactor (close loopholes).

**Core principle:** If you didn't watch an agent fail without the skill, you don't know if the skill teaches the right thing.

**REQUIRED BACKGROUND:** You MUST understand superpowers:test-driven-development before using this skill. That skill defines the fundamental RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle. This skill adapts TDD to documentation.

**Official guidance:** For Anthropic's official skill authoring best practices, see anthropic-best-practices.md. This document provides additional patterns and guidelines that complement the TDD-focused approach in this skill.

What is a Skill?

A **skill** is a reference guide for proven techniques, patterns, or tools. Skills help future Claude instances find and apply effective approaches.

**Skills are:** Reusable techniques, patterns, tools, reference guides

**Skills are NOT:** Narratives about how you solved a problem once

TDD Mapping for Skills

| TDD Concept | Skill Creation | |-------------|----------------| | **Test case** | Pressure scenario with subagent | | **Production code** | Skill document (SKILL.md) | | **Test fails (RED)** | Agent violates rule without skill (baseline) | | **Test passes (GREEN)** | Agent complies with skill present | | **Refactor** | Close loopholes while maintaining compliance | | **Write test first** | Run baseline scenario BEFORE writing skill | | **Watch it fail** | Document exact rationalizations agent uses | | **Minimal code** | Write skill addressing those specific violations | | **Watch it pass** | Verify agent now complies | | **Refactor cycle** | Find new rationalizations → plug → re-verify |

The entire skill creation process follows RED-GREEN-REFACTOR.

When to Create a Skill

**Create when:**

• Technique wasn't intuitively obvious to you
• You'd reference this again across projects
• Pattern applies broadly (not project-specific)
• Others would benefit

**Don't create for:**

• One-off solutions
• Standard practices well-documented elsewhere
• Project-specific conventions (put in CLAUDE.md)
• Mechanical constraints (if it's enforceable with regex/validation, automate it—save documentation for judgment calls)

Skill Types

Technique

Concrete method with steps to follow (condition-based-waiting, root-cause-tracing)

Pattern

Way of thinking about problems (flatten-with-flags, test-invariants)

Reference

API docs, syntax guides, tool documentation (office docs)

Directory Structure

skills/
  skill-name/
    SKILL.md              # Main reference (required)
    supporting-file.*     # Only if needed

**Flat namespace** - all skills in one searchable namespace

**Separate files for:** 1. **Heavy reference** (100+ lines) - API docs, comprehensive syntax 2. **Reusable tools** - Scripts, utilities, templates

**Keep inline:**

• Principles and concepts
• Code patterns (< 50 lines)
• Everything else

SKILL.md Structure

**Frontmatter (YAML):**

• Two required fields: `name` and `description` (see [agentskills.io/specification](https://agentskills.io/specification) for all supported fields)
• Max 1024 characters total
• `name`: Use letters, numbers, and hyphens only (no parentheses, special chars)
• `description`: Third-person, describes ONLY when to use (NOT what it does)
• Start with "Use when..." to focus on triggering conditions
• Include specific symptoms, situations, and contexts
• **NEVER summarize the skill's process or workflow** (see CSO section for why)
• Keep under 500 characters if possible

---
name: Skill-Name-With-Hyphens
description: Use when [specific triggering conditions and symptoms]
---

# Skill Name

## Overview
What is this? Core principle in 1-2 sentences.

## When to Use
[Small inline flowchart IF decision non-obvious]

Bullet list with SYMPTOMS and use cases
When NOT to use

## Core Pattern (for techniques/patterns)
Before/after code comparison

## Quick Reference
Table or bullets for scanning common operations

## Implementation
Inline code for simple patterns
Link to file for heavy reference or reusable tools

## Common Mistakes
What goes wrong + fixes

## Real-World Impact (optional)
Concrete results

Claude Search Optimization (CSO)

**Critical for discovery:** Future Claude needs to FIND your skill

1. Rich Description Field

**Purpose:** Claude reads description to decide which skills to load for a given task. Make it answer: "Should I read this skill right now?"

**Format:** Start with "Use when..." to focus on triggering conditions

**CRITICAL: Description = When to Use, NOT What the Skill Does**

The description should ONLY describe triggering conditions. Do NOT summarize the skill's process or workflow in the description.

**Why this matters:** Testing revealed that when a description summarizes the skill's workflow, Claude may follow the description instead of reading the full skill content. A description saying "code review between tasks" caused Claude to do ONE review, even though the skill's flowchart clearly showed TWO reviews (spec compliance then code quality).

When the description was changed to just "Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks" (no workflow summary), Claude correctly read the flowchart and followed the two-stage review process.

**The trap:** Descriptions that summarize workfl