api-and-interface-desi…
Guides stable API and interface design. Use when designing APIs, module boundaries, or any public interface. Use when creating…
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add kevinnft/ai-agent-skills --skill verification-before-completion --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add kevinnft/ai-agent-skills --skill verification-before-completion -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add kevinnft/ai-agent-skills --skill verification-before-completion -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add kevinnft/ai-agent-skills --skill verification-before-completion -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add kevinnft/ai-agent-skills --skill verification-before-completion -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add kevinnft/ai-agent-skills --skill verification-before-completion -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add kevinnft/ai-agent-skills --skill verification-before-completion -a windsurf -y
name: verification-before-completion description: Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always source_repo: "obra/superpowers" source_url: "https://github.com/obra/superpowers" source_license: "MIT" origin: aggregated language: en
Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.
**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.
**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction: 1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim? 2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete) 3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures 4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim? - If NO: State actual status with evidence - If YES: State claim WITH evidence 5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim Skip any step = lying, not verifying
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient | |-------|----------|----------------| | Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" | | Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation | | Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good | | Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed | | Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once | | Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" | | Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
| Excuse | Reality | |--------|---------| | "Should work now" | RUN the verification | | "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence | | "Just this once" | No exceptions | | "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler | | "Agent said success" | Verify independently | | "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse | | "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing | | "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
**Tests:**
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass" ❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
**Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):**
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass) ❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
**Build:**
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes" ❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
**Requirements:**
✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion ❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
**Agent delegation:**
✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state ❌ Trust agent report
From 24 failure memories:
**ALWAYS before:**
**Rule applies to:**
**No shortcuts for verification.**
Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.
This is non-negotiable.
191 attribution-first agent skills for Hermes Agent, Claude Code, Cursor — one installer, 28 categories, searchable catalog. See NOTICE for upstream attribution.
Guides stable API and interface design. Use when designing APIs, module boundaries, or any public interface. Use when creating…
Tests in real browsers. Use when building or debugging anything that runs in a browser. Use when you need to inspect the DOM,…
Automates CI/CD pipeline setup. Use when setting up or modifying build and deployment pipelines. Use when you need to automate…
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a…
Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder…
Optimizes agent context setup. Use when starting a new session, when agent output quality degrades, when switching between tasks,…
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.