api-and-interface-desi…
Guides stable API and interface design. Use when designing APIs, module boundaries, or any public interface. Use when creating REST or GraphQL endpoints,…
Throwaway experiments to validate an idea before build.
$ npx -y skills add kevinnft/ai-agent-skills --skill spike --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/spikeContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Throwaway experiments to validate an idea before build.
name: spike
description: "Throwaway experiments to validate an idea before build."
version: 1.0.0
author: Hermes Agent (adapted from gsd-build/get-shit-done)
license: MIT
metadata:
hermes:
tags: [spike, prototype, experiment, feasibility, throwaway, exploration, research, planning, mvp, proof-of-concept]
related_skills: [sketch, writing-plans, subagent-driven-development, plan]
origin: adapted
source_repo: gsd-build/get-shit-done
source_url: https://github.com/gsd-build/get-shit-done
source_license: MIT
language: enUse this skill when the user wants to **feel out an idea** before committing to a real build — validating feasibility, comparing approaches, or surfacing unknowns that no amount of research will answer. Spikes are disposable by design. Throw them away once they've paid their debt.
Load this when the user says things like "let me try this", "I want to see if X works", "spike this out", "before I commit to Y", "quick prototype of Z", "is this even possible?", or "compare A vs B".
If `gsd-spike` shows up as a sibling skill (installed via `npx get-shit-done-cc --hermes`), prefer **`gsd-spike`** when the user wants the full GSD workflow: persistent `.planning/spikes/` state, MANIFEST tracking across sessions, Given/When/Then verdict format, and commit patterns that integrate with the rest of GSD. This skill is the lightweight standalone version for users who don't have (or don't want) the full system.
Regardless of scale, every spike follows this loop:
decompose → research → build → verdict
↑__________________________________________↓
iterate on findingsBreak the user's idea into **2-5 independent feasibility questions**. Each question is one spike. Present them as a table with Given/When/Then framing:
| # | Spike | Validates (Given/When/Then) | Risk | |---|-------|----------------------------|------| | 001 | websocket-streaming | Given a WS connection, when LLM streams tokens, then client receives chunks < 100ms | High | | 002a | pdf-parse-pdfjs | Given a multi-page PDF, when parsed with pdfjs, then structured text is extractable | Medium | | 002b | pdf-parse-camelot | Given a multi-page PDF, when parsed with camelot, then structured text is extractable | Medium |
**Spike types:**
**Good spike questions:** specific feasibility with observable output. **Bad spike questions:** too broad, no observable output, or just "read the docs about X".
**Order by risk.** The spike most likely to kill the idea runs first. No point prototyping the easy parts if the hard part doesn't work.
**Skip decomposition** only if the user already knows exactly what they want to spike and says so. Then take their idea as a single spike.
Present the spike table. Ask: "Build all in this order, or adjust?" Let the user drop, reorder, or re-frame before you write any code.
Spikes are not research-free — you research enough to pick the right approach, then you build. Per spike:
1. **Brief it.** 2-3 sentences: what this spike is, why it matters, key risk. 2. **Surface competing approaches** if there's real choice:
| Approach | Tool/Library | Pros | Cons | Status | |----------|-------------|------|------|--------| | ... | ... | ... | ... | maintained / abandoned / beta |
3. **Pick one.** State why. If 2+ are credible, build quick variants within the spike. 4. **Skip research** for pure logic with no external dependencies.
Use Hermes tools for the research step:
For libraries without docs pages, clone and read their `README.md` / `examples/` via `read_file`. Context7 MCP (if the user has it configured) is also a good source — `mcp_*_resolve-library-id` then `mcp_*_query-docs`.
One directory per spike. Keep it standalone.
spikes/
├── 001-websocket-streaming/
│ ├── README.md
│ └── main.py
├── 002a-pdf-parse-pdfjs/
│ ├── README.md
│ └── parse.js
└── 002b-pdf-parse-camelot/
├── README.md
└── parse.py**Bias toward something the user can interact with.** Spikes fail when the only output is a log line that says "it works." The user wants to *feel* the spike working. Default choices, in order of preference:
1. A runnable CLI that takes input and prints observable output 2. A minimal HTML page that demonstrates the behavior 3. A small web server with one endpoint 4. A unit test that exercises the question with recognizable assertions
**Depth over speed.** Never declare "it works" after one happy-path run. Test edge cases. Follow surprising findings. The verdict is only trustworthy when the investigation was honest.
**Avoid** unless the spike specifically requires it: complex package management, build tools/bundlers, Docker, env files, config systems. Hardcode everything — it's a spike.
**Building one spike** — a typical tool sequence:
terminal("mkdir -p spikes/001-websocket-streaming")
write_file("spikes/001-websocket-streaming/README.md", "# 001: websocket-streaming\n\n...")
write_file("spikes/001-websocket-streaming/main.py", "...")
terminal("cd spikes/001-websocket-streaming && python3 main.py")
# Observe output, iterate.**Parallel comparison spi
191 attribution-first agent skills for Hermes Agent, Claude Code, Cursor — one installer, 28 categories, searchable catalog. See NOTICE for upstream attribution.
Repo: kevinnft/ai-agent-skills
Guides stable API and interface design. Use when designing APIs, module boundaries, or any public interface. Use when creating REST or GraphQL endpoints,…
Tests in real browsers. Use when building or debugging anything that runs in a browser. Use when you need to inspect the DOM, capture console errors, analyze…
Automates CI/CD pipeline setup. Use when setting up or modifying build and deployment pipelines. Use when you need to automate quality gates, configure test…
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to…
Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend…
Optimizes agent context setup. Use when starting a new session, when agent output quality degrades, when switching between tasks, or when you need to configure…