designing-the-analysis
Use when you have an approved research question and need a concrete analysis plan, before touching outcome data or fitting any…
Use when an analysis is complete and verified, and you need to decide how to report it and archive the work for reproducibility
$ npx -y skills add K-Dense-AI/science-superpowers --skill reporting-and-archiving-findings --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/reporting-and-archiving-findingsContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use when an analysis is complete and verified, and you need to decide how to report it and archive the work for reproducibility
name: reporting-and-archiving-findings description: Use when an analysis is complete and verified, and you need to decide how to report it and archive the work for reproducibility
Complete an investigation by confirming reproducibility, presenting clear options, handling the chosen one, and archiving everything needed to reproduce the result.
**Core principle:** Confirm reproducibility -> separate confirmatory from exploratory -> present options -> execute choice -> archive code + data + environment + pre-registration.
**Announce at start:** "I'm using the reporting-and-archiving-findings skill to complete this work."
Before reporting anything, confirm the whole analysis reproduces from immutable raw data with the fixed seed in the pinned environment.
# From a clean state: re-run the pipeline end to end # Confirm headline numbers match what you intend to report
Use `science-superpowers:verifying-results-before-claiming`. **If it doesn't reproduce, stop** — fix reproducibility (possibly via `science-superpowers:investigating-anomalous-results`) before reporting. Don't report a number you can't regenerate.
For any confirmatory claim, also run the pre-registration audit and keep its output for the report:
# ships with science-superpowers:preregistering-analysis <skills root>/preregistering-analysis/prereg.sh audit
**If the audit fails, the confirmatory label is indefensible** — the registration changed after its freeze, or outputs predate it. Relabel the affected analyses exploratory (or pre-register a fresh test on unused data) before reporting.
GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P) GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P) BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)
git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null
Or ask: "This branch split from main — correct?"
**Normal repo / named-branch worktree — present exactly these 4 options:**
Analysis complete and reproducible. What would you like to do? 1. Merge the analysis back to <base-branch> locally 2. Write up and share (report / preprint / pull request) 3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later) 4. Discard this work Which option?
**Detached HEAD — present these 3 (no local merge):**
Analysis complete and reproducible (externally managed workspace). 1. Push as a new branch and open a pull request / share 2. Keep as-is 3. Discard this work Which option?
Don't add explanation — keep options concise.
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel) cd "$MAIN_ROOT" git checkout <base-branch> && git pull && git merge <feature-branch> # Re-run the pipeline on the merged result; confirm it still reproduces
Then cleanup worktree (Step 6), then `git branch -d <feature-branch>`.
Produce the report (see "Report Content" below). If sharing via PR:
git push -u origin <feature-branch> gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF' ## Question <the research question> ## What was done <the pre-registered analysis, and any documented deviations> ## Findings <confirmatory results with effect sizes + intervals> ## Exploratory (not confirmatory) <clearly separated leads> ## Reproducibility - Pre-registration: <path/commit> - Environment: <lockfile> - Seed: <value> - Re-run: <command> EOF )"
**Do NOT clean up the worktree** — it's needed for iteration on feedback.
Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>." No cleanup.
Confirm first:
This will permanently delete: - Branch <name> - All commits: <list> - Worktree at <path> Type 'discard' to confirm.
Wait for the exact word. Then cleanup worktree (Step 6) and `git branch -D <feature-branch>`.
**Only for Options 1 and 4.** Options 2 and 3 preserve the worktree.
WORKTREE_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel) cd "$MAIN_ROOT" git worktree remove "$WORKTREE_PATH" git worktree prune
Every report MUST:
Whatever the option, ensure the archive contains everything needed to regenerate the result:
Science Superpowers is a complete computational-science methodology for your research agents, built on a set of composable skills plus initial instructions that make sure your agent actually uses them.
Use when you have an approved research question and need a concrete analysis plan, before touching outcome data or fitting any…
Use when facing 2+ independent investigations that can proceed without shared state - parallel literature survey, multi-dataset…
Use when your human partner has explicitly opted into exploratory or feasibility mode - a compute-heavy simulation, an unproven…
Use when you have a pre-registered analysis plan to execute inline in this session with review checkpoints, on a platform without…
You MUST use this before any data analysis or investigation - before exploring a dataset, loading or profiling data, running a…
Use when a result is surprising, impossible, contradicts a sanity check, a pipeline fails, a model won't converge, or a…