/steward-prep-delivery
Steward-assisted prep for filing issues and PRs — environment capture, template selection, duplicate detection, delivery-policy compliance check
$ npx -y skills add jmagly/aiwg --skill steward-prep-delivery --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/steward-prep-delivery
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Steward-assisted prep for filing issues and PRs — environment capture, template selection, duplicate detection, delivery-policy compliance check
SKILL.md
steward-prep-delivery.SKILL.mdnamespace: aiwg
name: steward-prep-delivery
platforms: [all]
description: Steward-assisted prep for filing issues and PRs — environment capture, template selection, duplicate detection, delivery-policy compliance check
script:
entrypoint: find-duplicates.sh
runtime: bash
cwd: project-root
argsHint: '<search-terms...>'
Steward Prep for Delivery (#1269)
You are walking the user through filing a high-quality issue or PR, mirroring the import pattern used for the recent jmagly→roctinam tester report sweep (Gitea #1264–#1269).
When this fires
- "I want to file an issue"
- "I want to open a PR"
- "Help me file a bug report"
- "Should this be a new issue or a comment on an existing one?"
- "Walk me through the import flow for this tester report"
The walkthrough
Step 1: Triage
Ask the user: "Is this one bug, or did you find multiple issues in a single session?"
- **One issue** → use `bug-report.md` (or `feature-request.md` if it's a proposal, not a defect)
- **Multiple findings** → use `tester-report.md` and split during triage
- **Already filed elsewhere** (GitHub, Discord, email) → use `imported-report.md`
Don't make this decision for them — surface the templates and let them pick.
Step 2: Environment capture (for bug reports)
For bug-report.md, the operator needs to fill in environment info. Help them collect it:
aiwg version
aiwg doctor
node --version
uname -a # OS / kernel
If they're filing on behalf of an agent platform (Claude Code, hermes, Codex, …), make sure the platform name is captured — the same bug can manifest differently across providers.
Step 3: Duplicate detection (BEFORE filing)
Run the duplicate-detection helper. The skill's `script:` entrypoint (`find-duplicates.sh`) searches the local `aiwg discover` index plus the Gitea issue tracker for likely duplicates of the proposed title or keywords:
aiwg run skill steward-prep-delivery -- "<keywords from the issue title>"
Output: ranked list of existing open issues that match. If any look like duplicates, **prefer commenting on them** over filing a new one. If none match, proceed to filing.
Step 4: Draft assembly
Help the user fill out the chosen template. Specifically:
- For **bug-report.md**: insist on a copy-paste-able repro (not "X seems broken"). Paste exact error text in code blocks.
- For **feature-request.md**: insist on a concrete proposal (interfaces, file paths, command syntax) — not "we should make X better."
- For **tester-report.md**: encourage one finding per section with severity, repro, expected/actual.
- For **imported-report.md**: include the source link, original reporter handle, and platform/environment correction if the source got it wrong (e.g., the jmagly tester report cited Claude Code, but the actual harness was hermes).
Step 5: Policy compliance check
Before they click "Submit", confirm:
1. **Delivery policy**: read `.aiwg/aiwg.config` `delivery.mode`. If `direct`, the fix will land with `Closes #N` in the commit (no PR). If `pr-required`, they'll need a feature branch. If `feature-branch`, branch only. Tell them what to expect.
2. **No AI attribution**: if they're using an AI tool to help draft, the commit/PR must not include `Co-Authored-By: <AI>` lines or "Generated with" markers. This is the project's no-attribution rule, applied universally.
3. **CI green before done**: a commit isn't done until CI passes. Remind them to wait for the run on Gitea, and if it fails, fix it before declaring resolution.
Step 6: Submit and follow up
For Gitea issues, use:
aiwg run skill issue-create -- "<title>" --provider gitea --labels "bug"
(Or invoke the relevant template manually via the Gitea web UI — both are fine.)
For PRs that close issues, ensure the body contains `Closes #N` (or `Refs #N` if it doesn't fully close).
Anti-patterns to flag
- **"While I'm at it"** — if the user starts adding unrelated changes during issue/PR drafting, split into separate tickets. One bug per issue, one concern per PR.
- **Vague titles** — "doesn't work" or "broken" titles get bumped back; insist on `type(scope): subject` form (e.g., `bug(steward): path resolution lands at dist/`).
- **Missing environment** — bug reports without OS/version/platform get clarified before action. Don't let them slip through.
- **Re-filing duplicates** — always run the duplicate-detection helper first. Comments on existing issues are cheaper than fresh issues.
Related skills
- `issue-create` — the actual filing surface (Gitea, GitHub, Jira, Linear, local)
- `issue-auto-sync` — detects commit ↔ issue links automatically
- `address-issues` — runs issue-driven agent loops to close issues with code
References
- `CONTRIBUTING.md` — full contributor guide
- `.gitea/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` — issue templates
- `.gitea/pull_request_template.md` — PR template
- `agentic/code/addons/aiwg-utils/rules/delivery-policy.md` — delivery mode rule
- `agentic/code/frameworks/sdlc-complete/rules/no-attribution.md` — no-attribution rule
- #1269 (parent issue), #1264–#1268 (the tester report sweep that motivated this)
Read more
namespace: aiwg name: steward-prep-delivery platforms: [all] description: Steward-assisted prep for filing issues and PRs — environment capture, template selection, duplicate detection, delivery-policy compliance check script: entrypoint: find-duplicates.sh runtime: bash cwd: project-root argsHint: '<search-terms...>'
Steward Prep for Delivery (#1269)
You are walking the user through filing a high-quality issue or PR, mirroring the import pattern used for the recent jmagly→roctinam tester report sweep (Gitea #1264–#1269).
When this fires
- "I want to file an issue"
- "I want to open a PR"
- "Help me file a bug report"
- "Should this be a new issue or a comment on an existing one?"
- "Walk me through the import flow for this tester report"
The walkthrough
Step 1: Triage
Ask the user: "Is this one bug, or did you find multiple issues in a single session?"
- **One issue** → use `bug-report.md` (or `feature-request.md` if it's a proposal, not a defect)
- **Multiple findings** → use `tester-report.md` and split during triage
- **Already filed elsewhere** (GitHub, Discord, email) → use `imported-report.md`
Don't make this decision for them — surface the templates and let them pick.
Step 2: Environment capture (for bug reports)
For bug-report.md, the operator needs to fill in environment info. Help them collect it:
aiwg version aiwg doctor node --version uname -a # OS / kernel
If they're filing on behalf of an agent platform (Claude Code, hermes, Codex, …), make sure the platform name is captured — the same bug can manifest differently across providers.
Step 3: Duplicate detection (BEFORE filing)
Run the duplicate-detection helper. The skill's `script:` entrypoint (`find-duplicates.sh`) searches the local `aiwg discover` index plus the Gitea issue tracker for likely duplicates of the proposed title or keywords:
aiwg run skill steward-prep-delivery -- "<keywords from the issue title>"
Output: ranked list of existing open issues that match. If any look like duplicates, **prefer commenting on them** over filing a new one. If none match, proceed to filing.
Step 4: Draft assembly
Help the user fill out the chosen template. Specifically:
- For **bug-report.md**: insist on a copy-paste-able repro (not "X seems broken"). Paste exact error text in code blocks.
- For **feature-request.md**: insist on a concrete proposal (interfaces, file paths, command syntax) — not "we should make X better."
- For **tester-report.md**: encourage one finding per section with severity, repro, expected/actual.
- For **imported-report.md**: include the source link, original reporter handle, and platform/environment correction if the source got it wrong (e.g., the jmagly tester report cited Claude Code, but the actual harness was hermes).
Step 5: Policy compliance check
Before they click "Submit", confirm:
1. **Delivery policy**: read `.aiwg/aiwg.config` `delivery.mode`. If `direct`, the fix will land with `Closes #N` in the commit (no PR). If `pr-required`, they'll need a feature branch. If `feature-branch`, branch only. Tell them what to expect.
2. **No AI attribution**: if they're using an AI tool to help draft, the commit/PR must not include `Co-Authored-By: <AI>` lines or "Generated with" markers. This is the project's no-attribution rule, applied universally.
3. **CI green before done**: a commit isn't done until CI passes. Remind them to wait for the run on Gitea, and if it fails, fix it before declaring resolution.
Step 6: Submit and follow up
For Gitea issues, use:
aiwg run skill issue-create -- "<title>" --provider gitea --labels "bug"
(Or invoke the relevant template manually via the Gitea web UI — both are fine.)
For PRs that close issues, ensure the body contains `Closes #N` (or `Refs #N` if it doesn't fully close).
Anti-patterns to flag
- **"While I'm at it"** — if the user starts adding unrelated changes during issue/PR drafting, split into separate tickets. One bug per issue, one concern per PR.
- **Vague titles** — "doesn't work" or "broken" titles get bumped back; insist on `type(scope): subject` form (e.g., `bug(steward): path resolution lands at dist/`).
- **Missing environment** — bug reports without OS/version/platform get clarified before action. Don't let them slip through.
- **Re-filing duplicates** — always run the duplicate-detection helper first. Comments on existing issues are cheaper than fresh issues.
Related skills
- `issue-create` — the actual filing surface (Gitea, GitHub, Jira, Linear, local)
- `issue-auto-sync` — detects commit ↔ issue links automatically
- `address-issues` — runs issue-driven agent loops to close issues with code
References
- `CONTRIBUTING.md` — full contributor guide
- `.gitea/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/` — issue templates
- `.gitea/pull_request_template.md` — PR template
- `agentic/code/addons/aiwg-utils/rules/delivery-policy.md` — delivery mode rule
- `agentic/code/frameworks/sdlc-complete/rules/no-attribution.md` — no-attribution rule
- #1269 (parent issue), #1264–#1268 (the tester report sweep that motivated this)
Multi-agent AI framework for Claude Code, Copilot, Cursor, Warp, and 6 more platforms 200+ agents, 109+ CLI commands, 400+ deployable agent/skill/command/rule artifacts, 8 core frameworks, 32 addons, and a 40-plugin Claude Code marketplace.
Repo: jmagly/aiwg
Other skills on aiwg.
- /agent-loop-ext
Crash-resilient external agent loop with state persistence and CI/CD integration
Open skill - /agent-loop
Detect requests for iterative autonomous agent loops and route to the appropriate loop executor
Open skill - /auto-test-execution
Automatically execute tests when code-generating agents modify source files, enforcing the execute-before-return pattern
Open skill - /cross-task-learner
Enable agent loops to learn from similar past tasks and share patterns across loops
Open skill - /debug-memory
Query and manage the executable feedback debug memory
Open skill - /execute-feedback
Execute tests on generated code and iterate until passing
Open skill

