/public-technology-review

namespace: aiwg
platforms: [all]
name: public-technology-review
description: Build a vendor-neutral, source-linked public-technology procurement evidence and risk review without autonomous scoring or award recommendations.
triggers:
  - review a public technology procurement
  - compare civic technology contract evidence
  - assess public sector vendor lock in and lifecycle risk

Public Technology Review

Process

1. Select and cite the governing procurement profile; FAR/NIST are reference models unless adopted by that jurisdiction. 2. Inventory need, planning, market research, solicitation, selection, award, administration, oversight, and public-release records. 3. Separate protected proposals/source-selection material from public releases. 4. Record claims and evidence without sentiment scores. Risk ratings require a human-defined scale, rationale, uncertainty, owner, and verification method. 5. Do not infer corruption, rank vendors, or recommend an award autonomously. 6. Record explicit handoff states for missing records, meeting/vote analysis, and any publication packet; protected material never enters a public handoff.

Output

A schema-valid evidence/risk review and human decision questions.

References

• `schemas/public-technology-review.schema.json`
• `templates/public-technology-review.md`
• `docs/research/civic-workflow-standards.md`
• `docs/research/control-source-matrix.md`