/claims-validator
Validate documentation for unsupported claims, made-up metrics, and unverifiable statements
$ npx -y skills add jmagly/aiwg --skill claims-validator --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/claims-validator
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Validate documentation for unsupported claims, made-up metrics, and unverifiable statements
SKILL.md
claims-validator.SKILL.mdnamespace: aiwg
name: claims-validator
platforms: [all]
description: Validate documentation for unsupported claims, made-up metrics, and unverifiable statements
claims-validator
Validate documentation for unsupported claims, made-up metrics, and unverifiable statements.
Triggers
Alternate expressions and non-obvious activations (primary phrases are matched automatically from the skill description):
- "fact-check this" → claim validation
- "verify [claim]" → specific claim check
Purpose
This skill identifies statements that make claims without evidence, including:
- Performance metrics without benchmarks or data
- Time/cost estimates without basis
- Percentage claims without citation
- Comparative statements without baselines
- Features described as implemented that don't exist
- Marketing superlatives presented as facts
Behavior
When triggered, this skill:
1. **Scans for metric claims**:
- Percentage improvements ("40% faster", "reduces by 60%")
- Time estimates ("saves 2-3 hours", "in minutes not hours")
- Cost projections ("$50-150/month", "ROI of 3x")
- Performance numbers ("99x faster", "sub-millisecond")
2. **Identifies unsupported comparatives**:
- "faster than", "better than", "more efficient"
- "best", "leading", "revolutionary", "game-changing"
- "comprehensive", "complete", "full-featured"
3. **Checks for feature claims**:
- Commands or flags mentioned that don't exist in codebase
- Features described in present tense that aren't implemented
- Integration claims without actual integration code
4. **Validates citations**:
- Claims that reference data should have sources
- Benchmarks should link to methodology
- Statistics should be reproducible
5. **Generates report**:
- List each claim found
- Classification (metric, comparative, feature, cost)
- Recommendation (remove, add citation, verify, rephrase)
Claim Categories
Metrics Without Data
# Flagged
"Time Saved: 92-96% (9-15 hours → 45-60 minutes)"
"99x faster routing"
"45x cache speedup"
# Problem
No benchmark data, methodology, or reproducible test
# Fix
Remove claim, or add: "Based on [benchmark/test], measured [how]"
Cost Estimates Without Basis
# Flagged
"Budget $20-50/month for moderate use"
"Light usage: ~$10-20/month"
"Enterprise teams may see $100-500+/month"
# Problem
No actual usage data, varies wildly by use case
# Fix
Remove specific numbers, or link to pricing calculator/methodology
Time Estimates Without Data
# Flagged
"Deploy Full SDLC Framework (2 Minutes)"
"5 minutes, replaces 2-4 hours manual work"
"campaign setup from 2-3 weeks → 1 week"
# Problem
No measurement, varies by project complexity
# Fix
Remove time claims, describe what it does instead
Comparative Claims Without Baseline
# Flagged
"faster than manual processes"
"more efficient than traditional approaches"
"better than existing solutions"
# Problem
No specific comparison, no baseline defined
# Fix
Remove comparison, or specify exactly what's being compared
Feature Claims for Unimplemented Features
# Flagged
"aiwg -migrate-workspace # Optional migration tool"
"Run 'config-validator --fix' to apply automated fixes"
# Problem
Command doesn't exist in codebase
# Fix
Remove until implemented, or mark as "Planned:"
Marketing Superlatives
# Flagged
"comprehensive", "revolutionary", "game-changing"
"best-in-class", "industry-leading", "cutting-edge"
"seamless", "effortless", "zero-friction"
# Problem
Subjective claims that can't be verified
# Fix
Replace with specific, factual descriptions
Validation Report Format
# Claims Validation Report
**Document**: README.md
**Date**: 2025-12-09
**Claims Found**: 12
**Issues**: 8
## Summary
| Category | Found | Unsupported | Action Needed |
|----------|-------|-------------|---------------|
| Metrics | 5 | 4 | Remove or cite |
| Time estimates | 3 | 3 | Remove |
| Cost estimates | 2 | 2 | Remove |
| Comparatives | 1 | 1 | Rephrase |
| Features | 1 | 1 | Remove (not implemented) |
## Issues
### 1. Unsupported Metric
**Line 204**: "Time Savings: 20-98% reduction across 5 core use cases"
**Problem**: No benchmark data or methodology
**Action**: Remove claim
### 2. Cost Estimate Without Data
**Line 1180**: "Light usage: ~$10-20/month"
**Problem**: No actual usage data to support estimate
**Action**: Remove specific numbers
### 3. Non-existent Feature
**Line 583**: "aiwg -migrate-workspace"
**Problem**: Command not implemented
**Action**: Remove until implemented
## Recommendations
1. **Remove all percentage-based time savings claims**
2. **Remove cost estimates** - direct users to measure their own usage
3. **Remove non-existent commands** - only document what exists
4. **Replace superlatives with specifics** - say what it does, not how good it is
Usage Examples
Validate a Document
User: "Check README.md for unsupported claims"
Output:
"Claims Validation: README.md
Found 8 unsupported claims:
Metrics (4):
- Line 204: '20-98% reduction' - no data
- Line 362: '56-63% time saved' - no data
- Line 588: '99x faster routing' - no benchmark
- Line 589: '45x cache speedup' - no benchmark
Time Estimates (2):
- Line 187: '5 minutes, replaces 2-4 hours' - unmeasured
- Line 366: '2 Minutes' in heading - varies by project
Non-existent Features (2):
- Line 583: 'aiwg -migrate-workspace' - not implemented
- Line 651: 'aiwg -rollback-workspace' - not implemented
Recommendation: Remove these claims. Describe what features
do, not how much time/money they save."
Quick Check
User: "Any BS in this section?"
Output:
"Found 2 issues:
1. 'Revolutionary approach' - marketing speak, be specific
2. '10x productivity gain' - no measurement
Suggest: Replace with factual descriptions of functionality."
Integration
This skill complements:
- **Voice F
Read more
namespace: aiwg name: claims-validator platforms: [all] description: Validate documentation for unsupported claims, made-up metrics, and unverifiable statements
claims-validator
Validate documentation for unsupported claims, made-up metrics, and unverifiable statements.
Triggers
Alternate expressions and non-obvious activations (primary phrases are matched automatically from the skill description):
- "fact-check this" → claim validation
- "verify [claim]" → specific claim check
Purpose
This skill identifies statements that make claims without evidence, including:
- Performance metrics without benchmarks or data
- Time/cost estimates without basis
- Percentage claims without citation
- Comparative statements without baselines
- Features described as implemented that don't exist
- Marketing superlatives presented as facts
Behavior
When triggered, this skill:
1. **Scans for metric claims**:
- Percentage improvements ("40% faster", "reduces by 60%")
- Time estimates ("saves 2-3 hours", "in minutes not hours")
- Cost projections ("$50-150/month", "ROI of 3x")
- Performance numbers ("99x faster", "sub-millisecond")
2. **Identifies unsupported comparatives**:
- "faster than", "better than", "more efficient"
- "best", "leading", "revolutionary", "game-changing"
- "comprehensive", "complete", "full-featured"
3. **Checks for feature claims**:
- Commands or flags mentioned that don't exist in codebase
- Features described in present tense that aren't implemented
- Integration claims without actual integration code
4. **Validates citations**:
- Claims that reference data should have sources
- Benchmarks should link to methodology
- Statistics should be reproducible
5. **Generates report**:
- List each claim found
- Classification (metric, comparative, feature, cost)
- Recommendation (remove, add citation, verify, rephrase)
Claim Categories
Metrics Without Data
# Flagged "Time Saved: 92-96% (9-15 hours → 45-60 minutes)" "99x faster routing" "45x cache speedup" # Problem No benchmark data, methodology, or reproducible test # Fix Remove claim, or add: "Based on [benchmark/test], measured [how]"
Cost Estimates Without Basis
# Flagged "Budget $20-50/month for moderate use" "Light usage: ~$10-20/month" "Enterprise teams may see $100-500+/month" # Problem No actual usage data, varies wildly by use case # Fix Remove specific numbers, or link to pricing calculator/methodology
Time Estimates Without Data
# Flagged "Deploy Full SDLC Framework (2 Minutes)" "5 minutes, replaces 2-4 hours manual work" "campaign setup from 2-3 weeks → 1 week" # Problem No measurement, varies by project complexity # Fix Remove time claims, describe what it does instead
Comparative Claims Without Baseline
# Flagged "faster than manual processes" "more efficient than traditional approaches" "better than existing solutions" # Problem No specific comparison, no baseline defined # Fix Remove comparison, or specify exactly what's being compared
Feature Claims for Unimplemented Features
# Flagged "aiwg -migrate-workspace # Optional migration tool" "Run 'config-validator --fix' to apply automated fixes" # Problem Command doesn't exist in codebase # Fix Remove until implemented, or mark as "Planned:"
Marketing Superlatives
# Flagged "comprehensive", "revolutionary", "game-changing" "best-in-class", "industry-leading", "cutting-edge" "seamless", "effortless", "zero-friction" # Problem Subjective claims that can't be verified # Fix Replace with specific, factual descriptions
Validation Report Format
# Claims Validation Report **Document**: README.md **Date**: 2025-12-09 **Claims Found**: 12 **Issues**: 8 ## Summary | Category | Found | Unsupported | Action Needed | |----------|-------|-------------|---------------| | Metrics | 5 | 4 | Remove or cite | | Time estimates | 3 | 3 | Remove | | Cost estimates | 2 | 2 | Remove | | Comparatives | 1 | 1 | Rephrase | | Features | 1 | 1 | Remove (not implemented) | ## Issues ### 1. Unsupported Metric **Line 204**: "Time Savings: 20-98% reduction across 5 core use cases" **Problem**: No benchmark data or methodology **Action**: Remove claim ### 2. Cost Estimate Without Data **Line 1180**: "Light usage: ~$10-20/month" **Problem**: No actual usage data to support estimate **Action**: Remove specific numbers ### 3. Non-existent Feature **Line 583**: "aiwg -migrate-workspace" **Problem**: Command not implemented **Action**: Remove until implemented ## Recommendations 1. **Remove all percentage-based time savings claims** 2. **Remove cost estimates** - direct users to measure their own usage 3. **Remove non-existent commands** - only document what exists 4. **Replace superlatives with specifics** - say what it does, not how good it is
Usage Examples
Validate a Document
User: "Check README.md for unsupported claims" Output: "Claims Validation: README.md Found 8 unsupported claims: Metrics (4): - Line 204: '20-98% reduction' - no data - Line 362: '56-63% time saved' - no data - Line 588: '99x faster routing' - no benchmark - Line 589: '45x cache speedup' - no benchmark Time Estimates (2): - Line 187: '5 minutes, replaces 2-4 hours' - unmeasured - Line 366: '2 Minutes' in heading - varies by project Non-existent Features (2): - Line 583: 'aiwg -migrate-workspace' - not implemented - Line 651: 'aiwg -rollback-workspace' - not implemented Recommendation: Remove these claims. Describe what features do, not how much time/money they save."
Quick Check
User: "Any BS in this section?" Output: "Found 2 issues: 1. 'Revolutionary approach' - marketing speak, be specific 2. '10x productivity gain' - no measurement Suggest: Replace with factual descriptions of functionality."
Integration
This skill complements:
- **Voice F
Multi-agent AI framework for Claude Code, Copilot, Cursor, Warp, and 6 more platforms 200+ agents, 109+ CLI commands, 400+ deployable agent/skill/command/rule artifacts, 8 core frameworks, 32 addons, and a 40-plugin Claude Code marketplace.
Repo: jmagly/aiwg
Other skills on aiwg.
- /agent-loop-ext
Crash-resilient external agent loop with state persistence and CI/CD integration
Open skill - /agent-loop
Detect requests for iterative autonomous agent loops and route to the appropriate loop executor
Open skill - /auto-test-execution
Automatically execute tests when code-generating agents modify source files, enforcing the execute-before-return pattern
Open skill - /cross-task-learner
Enable agent loops to learn from similar past tasks and share patterns across loops
Open skill - /debug-memory
Query and manage the executable feedback debug memory
Open skill - /execute-feedback
Execute tests on generated code and iterate until passing
Open skill

