Skip to content
Development
Skill

/claims-validator

Validate documentation for unsupported claims, made-up metrics, and unverifiable statements

From plugin
aiwg
211200 skills199 agents26 commands
Install
$ npx -y skills add jmagly/aiwg --skill claims-validator --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/claims-validator

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Validate documentation for unsupported claims, made-up metrics, and unverifiable statements

SKILL.md

claims-validator.SKILL.md
namespace: aiwg
name: claims-validator
platforms: [all]
description: Validate documentation for unsupported claims, made-up metrics, and unverifiable statements

claims-validator

Validate documentation for unsupported claims, made-up metrics, and unverifiable statements.

Triggers

Alternate expressions and non-obvious activations (primary phrases are matched automatically from the skill description):

  • "fact-check this" → claim validation
  • "verify [claim]" → specific claim check

Purpose

This skill identifies statements that make claims without evidence, including:

  • Performance metrics without benchmarks or data
  • Time/cost estimates without basis
  • Percentage claims without citation
  • Comparative statements without baselines
  • Features described as implemented that don't exist
  • Marketing superlatives presented as facts

Behavior

When triggered, this skill:

1. **Scans for metric claims**:

  • Percentage improvements ("40% faster", "reduces by 60%")
  • Time estimates ("saves 2-3 hours", "in minutes not hours")
  • Cost projections ("$50-150/month", "ROI of 3x")
  • Performance numbers ("99x faster", "sub-millisecond")

2. **Identifies unsupported comparatives**:

  • "faster than", "better than", "more efficient"
  • "best", "leading", "revolutionary", "game-changing"
  • "comprehensive", "complete", "full-featured"

3. **Checks for feature claims**:

  • Commands or flags mentioned that don't exist in codebase
  • Features described in present tense that aren't implemented
  • Integration claims without actual integration code

4. **Validates citations**:

  • Claims that reference data should have sources
  • Benchmarks should link to methodology
  • Statistics should be reproducible

5. **Generates report**:

  • List each claim found
  • Classification (metric, comparative, feature, cost)
  • Recommendation (remove, add citation, verify, rephrase)

Claim Categories

Metrics Without Data

# Flagged
"Time Saved: 92-96% (9-15 hours → 45-60 minutes)"
"99x faster routing"
"45x cache speedup"

# Problem
No benchmark data, methodology, or reproducible test

# Fix
Remove claim, or add: "Based on [benchmark/test], measured [how]"

Cost Estimates Without Basis

# Flagged
"Budget $20-50/month for moderate use"
"Light usage: ~$10-20/month"
"Enterprise teams may see $100-500+/month"

# Problem
No actual usage data, varies wildly by use case

# Fix
Remove specific numbers, or link to pricing calculator/methodology

Time Estimates Without Data

# Flagged
"Deploy Full SDLC Framework (2 Minutes)"
"5 minutes, replaces 2-4 hours manual work"
"campaign setup from 2-3 weeks → 1 week"

# Problem
No measurement, varies by project complexity

# Fix
Remove time claims, describe what it does instead

Comparative Claims Without Baseline

# Flagged
"faster than manual processes"
"more efficient than traditional approaches"
"better than existing solutions"

# Problem
No specific comparison, no baseline defined

# Fix
Remove comparison, or specify exactly what's being compared

Feature Claims for Unimplemented Features

# Flagged
"aiwg -migrate-workspace  # Optional migration tool"
"Run 'config-validator --fix' to apply automated fixes"

# Problem
Command doesn't exist in codebase

# Fix
Remove until implemented, or mark as "Planned:"

Marketing Superlatives

# Flagged
"comprehensive", "revolutionary", "game-changing"
"best-in-class", "industry-leading", "cutting-edge"
"seamless", "effortless", "zero-friction"

# Problem
Subjective claims that can't be verified

# Fix
Replace with specific, factual descriptions

Validation Report Format

# Claims Validation Report

**Document**: README.md
**Date**: 2025-12-09
**Claims Found**: 12
**Issues**: 8

## Summary

| Category | Found | Unsupported | Action Needed |
|----------|-------|-------------|---------------|
| Metrics | 5 | 4 | Remove or cite |
| Time estimates | 3 | 3 | Remove |
| Cost estimates | 2 | 2 | Remove |
| Comparatives | 1 | 1 | Rephrase |
| Features | 1 | 1 | Remove (not implemented) |

## Issues

### 1. Unsupported Metric
**Line 204**: "Time Savings: 20-98% reduction across 5 core use cases"
**Problem**: No benchmark data or methodology
**Action**: Remove claim

### 2. Cost Estimate Without Data
**Line 1180**: "Light usage: ~$10-20/month"
**Problem**: No actual usage data to support estimate
**Action**: Remove specific numbers

### 3. Non-existent Feature
**Line 583**: "aiwg -migrate-workspace"
**Problem**: Command not implemented
**Action**: Remove until implemented

## Recommendations

1. **Remove all percentage-based time savings claims**
2. **Remove cost estimates** - direct users to measure their own usage
3. **Remove non-existent commands** - only document what exists
4. **Replace superlatives with specifics** - say what it does, not how good it is

Usage Examples

Validate a Document

User: "Check README.md for unsupported claims"

Output:
"Claims Validation: README.md

Found 8 unsupported claims:

Metrics (4):
- Line 204: '20-98% reduction' - no data
- Line 362: '56-63% time saved' - no data
- Line 588: '99x faster routing' - no benchmark
- Line 589: '45x cache speedup' - no benchmark

Time Estimates (2):
- Line 187: '5 minutes, replaces 2-4 hours' - unmeasured
- Line 366: '2 Minutes' in heading - varies by project

Non-existent Features (2):
- Line 583: 'aiwg -migrate-workspace' - not implemented
- Line 651: 'aiwg -rollback-workspace' - not implemented

Recommendation: Remove these claims. Describe what features
do, not how much time/money they save."

Quick Check

User: "Any BS in this section?"

Output:
"Found 2 issues:

1. 'Revolutionary approach' - marketing speak, be specific
2. '10x productivity gain' - no measurement

Suggest: Replace with factual descriptions of functionality."

Integration

This skill complements:

  • **Voice F
Read more
Ships withaiwg

Reusable project context and specialist workflows for the AI tools you already use. Plan software, coordinate specialist reviews, prepare campaigns, investigate incidents, organize research, curate media, and maintain operational knowledge.

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on aiwg.