a2a-security-review
Review agent-to-agent (A2A) / multi-agent-system trust: peer identity and authentication, message integrity, capability-negotiation trust, and delegation-chain…
Look up the safe idiom and known-risky API/library for a language or framework (Python, JS/TS/Node, Java, Go, C/C++, Ruby) before or while writing code — a design/build-time cheat-sheet, distinct from post-hoc scanning. Use when writing or reviewing code, scoping a PRD's tech
$ npx -y skills add jassics/awesome-claude-security --skill secure-coding-kb --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/secure-coding-kbContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Look up the safe idiom and known-risky API/library for a language or framework (Python, JS/TS/Node, Java, Go, C/C++, Ruby) before or while writing code — a design/build-time cheat-sheet, distinct from post-hoc scanning. Use when writing or reviewing code, scoping a PRD's tech
name: secure-coding-kb description: >- Look up the safe idiom and known-risky API/library for a language or framework (Python, JS/TS/Node, Java, Go, C/C++, Ruby) before or while writing code — a design/build-time cheat-sheet, distinct from post-hoc scanning. Use when writing or reviewing code, scoping a PRD's tech stack, or advising an AI-assisted/vibe-coded change on which APIs and libraries to avoid up front.
The safe pattern and the risky API/library to avoid for the language(s)/framework(s) in scope — consulted *while designing or writing code*, so unsafe patterns are never introduced rather than caught later by a scanner.
1. **Identify the language(s)/framework(s) in scope** for the code, PRD, or feature being built. 2. **Pull the relevant guidance from `reference.md`** for each: unsafe API/pattern → safe replacement, and risky/abandoned libraries → maintained alternative. 3. **Flag framework-specific footguns** (e.g. Django/Flask, Express/Node, Spring/Java, Rails, Go stdlib) — defaults that are insecure unless explicitly hardened. 4. **Cite OWASP Cheat Sheet Series** for depth beyond this quick-reference — it's the canonical, continuously-updated source; this skill is a fast lookup, not a replacement.
A short table: pattern/library flagged · why risky · safe replacement · source (OWASP Cheat Sheet name). For an existing codebase, hand off found instances to `sast-sca:sast-review` for the code-level fix; for new work, this *is* the fix — inject the safe pattern before code is written.
This complements, not replaces, `sast-sca:sast-review`: that skill scans code that already exists and reports what's wrong; this skill guides what to write in the first place — most valuable during design, PRD scoping, or AI-assisted/"vibe coded" implementation where no security requirement was stated up front (see `security-architect:prd-security-injection` for injecting requirements into the PRD/prompt itself). See `reference.md` for the per-language tables. For Python/ React specifically, `secure-coding:safe-function-lint` turns a subset of this guidance into an enforced, hook-blocked check rather than a reference lookup — point the user there once they want prevention, not just guidance.
A Claude Code plugin marketplace for the full cybersecurity & GenAI-security lifecycle — from recon and threat modeling to detection engineering, GRC, and CISO-level strategy. A pentester knows which OWASP test bends a broken-access-control endpoint.
Repo: jassics/awesome-claude-security
Review agent-to-agent (A2A) / multi-agent-system trust: peer identity and authentication, message integrity, capability-negotiation trust, and delegation-chain…
Test the agent execution harness/runtime itself — LangChain/LangGraph, AutoGen, CrewAI, custom ReAct-style loops, or computer-use/browser-use agents — for…
Assess an autonomous / tool-using AI agent for security end-to-end: tool privileges, autonomy and approval boundaries, excessive agency, memory/state…
Test what an AI agent will actually do without human confirmation, including under injected-goal / prompt-injection scenarios, to validate its autonomy and…
Review the security of MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers/clients an agent uses: server trust tier, tool/resource description and result poisoning,…
Inventory the tools/functions an AI agent can call and audit their privileges, side effects, and approval requirements to find excessive-agency and…