a2a-security-review
Review agent-to-agent (A2A) / multi-agent-system trust: peer identity and authentication, message integrity,…
Rank a set of enumerated threats or findings by risk (likelihood × impact) and map each to a prioritized mitigation. Use after STRIDE/PASTA enumeration or any time you have a threat/finding list that needs prioritization.
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add jassics/awesome-claude-security --skill risk-rank --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add jassics/awesome-claude-security --skill risk-rank -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add jassics/awesome-claude-security --skill risk-rank -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add jassics/awesome-claude-security --skill risk-rank -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add jassics/awesome-claude-security --skill risk-rank -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add jassics/awesome-claude-security --skill risk-rank -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add jassics/awesome-claude-security --skill risk-rank -a windsurf -y
name: risk-rank description: >- Rank a set of enumerated threats or findings by risk (likelihood × impact) and map each to a prioritized mitigation. Use after STRIDE/PASTA enumeration or any time you have a threat/finding list that needs prioritization.
A defensible risk ranking that drives remediation order, with each item tied to a mitigation and a suggested priority.
1. **Score likelihood** (1–5): attacker capability required, exposure/reachability, exploit availability, existing controls. 2. **Score impact** (1–5): confidentiality/integrity/availability damage, blast radius, business/compliance consequence. 3. **Risk = likelihood × impact** (1–25). Banding: 1–5 Low · 6–11 Medium · 12–18 High · 19–25 Critical. (For vuln-level items, prefer CVSS via `security-reporting:cvss` and reconcile the two.) 4. **Map mitigation** per item: the control that most reduces likelihood or impact; note whether it already exists (gap vs. present). 5. **Prioritize** by risk, then by remediation cost/effort (quick high-risk wins first).
A ranked table: ID · threat/finding · likelihood · impact · risk · band · mitigation · effort · priority. Plus a short "do first / do next / accept" list.
State the scoring assumptions so the ranking is reproducible and challengeable. Keep likelihood and impact independent — don't double-count exposure in both.
A Claude Code plugin marketplace for the full cybersecurity & GenAI-security lifecycle — from recon and threat modeling to detection engineering, GRC, and CISO-level strategy. A pentester knows which OWASP test bends a broken-access-control endpoint.
Review agent-to-agent (A2A) / multi-agent-system trust: peer identity and authentication, message integrity,…
Test the agent execution harness/runtime itself — LangChain/LangGraph, AutoGen, CrewAI, custom ReAct-style loops, or…
Assess an autonomous / tool-using AI agent for security end-to-end: tool privileges, autonomy and approval boundaries, excessive…
Test what an AI agent will actually do without human confirmation, including under injected-goal / prompt-injection scenarios, to…
Review the security of MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers/clients an agent uses: server trust tier, tool/resource description…
Inventory the tools/functions an AI agent can call and audit their privileges, side effects, and approval requirements to find…
Use for authorized security assessment of REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, or SOAP APIs, including discovery, authentication,…
Extract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys)…
Clean and finalize authorized natural-language text intended for readers by auditing suspicious invisible Unicode and rewriting…