/academic-writing
Academic writing, research methodology, and scholarly communication workflows. Use when writing papers, literature reviews, grant proposals, conducting research, managing citations, preparing for peer review, choosing OA routes under Plan S / 2026 OSTP Nelson Memo, posting
$ npx -y skills add jamditis/claude-skills-journalism --skill academic-writing --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/academic-writing
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Academic writing, research methodology, and scholarly communication workflows. Use when writing papers, literature reviews, grant proposals, conducting research, managing citations, preparing for peer review, choosing OA routes under Plan S / 2026 OSTP Nelson Memo, posting
SKILL.md
academic-writing.SKILL.mdname: academic-writing
description: Academic writing, research methodology, and scholarly communication workflows. Use when writing papers, literature reviews, grant proposals, conducting research, managing citations, preparing for peer review, choosing OA routes under Plan S / 2026 OSTP Nelson Memo, posting preprints, working with persistent identifiers (ORCID, DOI, ROR), assigning CRediT contributor roles, preregistering analyses on OSF / AsPredicted, or disclosing LLM use to journals and funders. Essential for researchers, graduate students, and academics across disciplines.
Academic writing and research methodology
Systematic approaches for scholarly writing, research design, and academic communication.
Research design fundamentals
Research question development
## Crafting a research question
### The FINER criteria
- **F**easible: Can you actually do this research?
- **I**nteresting: Does it matter to the field?
- **N**ovel: Does it add new knowledge?
- **E**thical: Can it be done ethically?
- **R**elevant: Does it address a real problem?
### Question types
| Type | Purpose | Example |
|------|---------|---------|
| Descriptive | Document phenomena | "What are the characteristics of X?" |
| Comparative | Compare groups/conditions | "How does X differ between groups?" |
| Correlational | Examine relationships | "Is there a relationship between X and Y?" |
| Causal | Establish causation | "Does X cause Y?" |
| Exploratory | Generate hypotheses | "What factors might explain X?" |
### Refining your question
Start broad → Narrow progressively
Draft 1: "How does social media affect politics?"
Draft 2: "How does Twitter use affect political polarization?"
Draft 3: "How does exposure to partisan Twitter accounts affect
political attitude polarization among US adults?"
Draft 4: "Does increased exposure to ideologically homogeneous Twitter
feeds increase affective polarization among politically
engaged US adults aged 18-35?"Literature review strategy
## Systematic literature search
### Database selection by field
- **Multidisciplinary**: Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar
- **Social Sciences**: JSTOR, ProQuest, SSRN
- **Communication**: Communication Abstracts, ComAbstracts
- **Health**: PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL
- **Education**: ERIC
- **Business**: Business Source Complete
### Search strategy template
1. **Identify key concepts** from research question
2. **Generate synonyms** for each concept
3. **Combine with Boolean operators**
Example for: "social media political polarization"
Concept 1: social media
- OR: Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, "social networking sites",
"online platforms", "digital media"
Concept 2: political
- OR: partisan, ideological, electoral, civic
Concept 3: polarization
- OR: division, extremism, "attitude change", radicalization
Combined search:
(Twitter OR Facebook OR "social media" OR "social networking")
AND (political OR partisan OR ideological)
AND (polarization OR division OR extremism)
### Inclusion/exclusion criteria
Document your criteria:
- Publication date range: [X to present]
- Languages: [English only / multiple]
- Publication types: [Peer-reviewed only / include preprints]
- Geographic scope: [Global / specific countries]
- Methodologies: [All / specific approaches]
### Managing your search
- Save searches to re-run later
- Export results to reference manager
- Track number of results at each stage
- Document date of each searchCitation management
# Zotero/reference manager integration patterns
# For automated citation workflows
CITATION_STYLES = {
'apa7': 'American Psychological Association 7th edition',
'mla9': 'Modern Language Association 9th edition',
'chicago': 'Chicago Manual of Style 17th edition',
'harvard': 'Harvard Reference format',
'ieee': 'IEEE',
'vancouver': 'Vancouver (medicine)',
}
# BibTeX entry template
BIBTEX_ARTICLE = """
@article{{{citekey},
author = {{{author}}},
title = {{{title}}},
journal = {{{journal}}},
year = {{{year}}},
volume = {{{volume}}},
number = {{{number}}},
pages = {{{pages}}},
doi = {{{doi}}}
}}
"""
# Common citation patterns by context
CITATION_CONTEXTS = {
'introducing_concept': "According to Author (Year), ...",
'supporting_claim': "Research has shown that X (Author, Year; Author, Year).",
'contrasting': "While Author (Year) argues X, Author (Year) contends Y.",
'methodology_reference': "Following the method developed by Author (Year), ...",
'direct_quote': 'Author (Year) states that "exact quote" (p. X).',
}Paper structure and writing
IMRaD structure (scientific papers)
## Standard research paper sections
### Abstract (150-300 words typically)
- Background (1-2 sentences)
- Purpose/objective (1 sentence)
- Methods (2-3 sentences)
- Results (2-3 sentences)
- Conclusions (1-2 sentences)
### Introduction
**Funnel structure:**
1. Broad context - Why does this topic matter?
2. Narrow focus - What's the specific problem?
3. Gap identification - What don't we know?
4. Research question/hypothesis - What will you investigate?
5. Contribution preview - Why does this study matter?
### Literature Review
**Organize thematically, not chronologically:**
1. Theme 1: Key findings, debates, gaps
2. Theme 2: Key findings, debates, gaps
3. Theme 3: Key findings, debates, gaps
4. Synthesis: How themes connect to your study
### Methods
**The reproducibility test:** Could another researcher replicate your study from this section alone?
Include:
- Participants/sample (who, how selected, N)
- Materials/measures (what instruments, their validity)
- Procedure (step-by-step what happened)
- Analysis approach (statistical tests, qualitative methods)
- Ethical considerations (IRB, consent)
### Results
**Report, don't interpret:**
- Present findings systematically
- Use tables/figures for complex data
- Report
Read more
name: academic-writing description: Academic writing, research methodology, and scholarly communication workflows. Use when writing papers, literature reviews, grant proposals, conducting research, managing citations, preparing for peer review, choosing OA routes under Plan S / 2026 OSTP Nelson Memo, posting preprints, working with persistent identifiers (ORCID, DOI, ROR), assigning CRediT contributor roles, preregistering analyses on OSF / AsPredicted, or disclosing LLM use to journals and funders. Essential for researchers, graduate students, and academics across disciplines.
Academic writing and research methodology
Systematic approaches for scholarly writing, research design, and academic communication.
Research design fundamentals
Research question development
## Crafting a research question
### The FINER criteria
- **F**easible: Can you actually do this research?
- **I**nteresting: Does it matter to the field?
- **N**ovel: Does it add new knowledge?
- **E**thical: Can it be done ethically?
- **R**elevant: Does it address a real problem?
### Question types
| Type | Purpose | Example |
|------|---------|---------|
| Descriptive | Document phenomena | "What are the characteristics of X?" |
| Comparative | Compare groups/conditions | "How does X differ between groups?" |
| Correlational | Examine relationships | "Is there a relationship between X and Y?" |
| Causal | Establish causation | "Does X cause Y?" |
| Exploratory | Generate hypotheses | "What factors might explain X?" |
### Refining your question
Start broad → Narrow progressively
Draft 1: "How does social media affect politics?"
Draft 2: "How does Twitter use affect political polarization?"
Draft 3: "How does exposure to partisan Twitter accounts affect
political attitude polarization among US adults?"
Draft 4: "Does increased exposure to ideologically homogeneous Twitter
feeds increase affective polarization among politically
engaged US adults aged 18-35?"Literature review strategy
## Systematic literature search
### Database selection by field
- **Multidisciplinary**: Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar
- **Social Sciences**: JSTOR, ProQuest, SSRN
- **Communication**: Communication Abstracts, ComAbstracts
- **Health**: PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL
- **Education**: ERIC
- **Business**: Business Source Complete
### Search strategy template
1. **Identify key concepts** from research question
2. **Generate synonyms** for each concept
3. **Combine with Boolean operators**
Example for: "social media political polarization"
Concept 1: social media
- OR: Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, "social networking sites",
"online platforms", "digital media"
Concept 2: political
- OR: partisan, ideological, electoral, civic
Concept 3: polarization
- OR: division, extremism, "attitude change", radicalization
Combined search:
(Twitter OR Facebook OR "social media" OR "social networking")
AND (political OR partisan OR ideological)
AND (polarization OR division OR extremism)
### Inclusion/exclusion criteria
Document your criteria:
- Publication date range: [X to present]
- Languages: [English only / multiple]
- Publication types: [Peer-reviewed only / include preprints]
- Geographic scope: [Global / specific countries]
- Methodologies: [All / specific approaches]
### Managing your search
- Save searches to re-run later
- Export results to reference manager
- Track number of results at each stage
- Document date of each searchCitation management
# Zotero/reference manager integration patterns
# For automated citation workflows
CITATION_STYLES = {
'apa7': 'American Psychological Association 7th edition',
'mla9': 'Modern Language Association 9th edition',
'chicago': 'Chicago Manual of Style 17th edition',
'harvard': 'Harvard Reference format',
'ieee': 'IEEE',
'vancouver': 'Vancouver (medicine)',
}
# BibTeX entry template
BIBTEX_ARTICLE = """
@article{{{citekey},
author = {{{author}}},
title = {{{title}}},
journal = {{{journal}}},
year = {{{year}}},
volume = {{{volume}}},
number = {{{number}}},
pages = {{{pages}}},
doi = {{{doi}}}
}}
"""
# Common citation patterns by context
CITATION_CONTEXTS = {
'introducing_concept': "According to Author (Year), ...",
'supporting_claim': "Research has shown that X (Author, Year; Author, Year).",
'contrasting': "While Author (Year) argues X, Author (Year) contends Y.",
'methodology_reference': "Following the method developed by Author (Year), ...",
'direct_quote': 'Author (Year) states that "exact quote" (p. X).',
}Paper structure and writing
IMRaD structure (scientific papers)
## Standard research paper sections ### Abstract (150-300 words typically) - Background (1-2 sentences) - Purpose/objective (1 sentence) - Methods (2-3 sentences) - Results (2-3 sentences) - Conclusions (1-2 sentences) ### Introduction **Funnel structure:** 1. Broad context - Why does this topic matter? 2. Narrow focus - What's the specific problem? 3. Gap identification - What don't we know? 4. Research question/hypothesis - What will you investigate? 5. Contribution preview - Why does this study matter? ### Literature Review **Organize thematically, not chronologically:** 1. Theme 1: Key findings, debates, gaps 2. Theme 2: Key findings, debates, gaps 3. Theme 3: Key findings, debates, gaps 4. Synthesis: How themes connect to your study ### Methods **The reproducibility test:** Could another researcher replicate your study from this section alone? Include: - Participants/sample (who, how selected, N) - Materials/measures (what instruments, their validity) - Procedure (step-by-step what happened) - Analysis approach (statistical tests, qualitative methods) - Ethical considerations (IRB, consent) ### Results **Report, don't interpret:** - Present findings systematically - Use tables/figures for complex data - Report
A collection of Agent Skills for journalists, researchers, academics, media professionals, and communications practitioners. The same repository serves Claude Code and Codex while keeping Claude-only commands, agents, and hooks clearly labeled.
Repo: jamditis/claude-skills-journalism
Other skills on claude-skills-journalism.
- /accessibility-compliance
Web accessibility patterns for news sites, journalism tools, and academic platforms. Use when building accessible interfaces, auditing existing sites for WCAG compliance, writing alt text for news images, creating accessible data visualizations, or ensuring content reaches all
Open skill - /claude-md-updater
Use this skill when the user asks to update CLAUDE.md, save a lesson, or persist something from the current session: phrases like "update claude.md", "what should we remember", "save this lesson", or "add to context". Scans the conversation for hard-won lessons, new file paths,
Open skill - /electron-dev
Electron desktop application development with React, TypeScript, and Vite. Use when building desktop apps, implementing IPC communication, managing windows/tray, handling PTY terminals, integrating WebRTC/audio, or packaging with electron-builder. Covers patterns from AudioBash,
Open skill - /mobile-debugging
Remote JavaScript console access and debugging on mobile devices. Use when debugging web pages on phones/tablets, accessing console errors without desktop DevTools, testing responsive designs on real devices, or diagnosing mobile-specific issues. Covers locally hosted Eruda and
Open skill - /one-way-door
Use this skill when creating new files that represent architectural decisions — data models, infrastructure configs, auth boundaries, API contracts, CI/CD pipelines, or event systems. Flags irreversible decisions and forces a discussion about trade-offs before committing.
Open skill - /python-pipeline
Python data processing pipelines with modular architecture. Use when building content processing workflows, implementing dispatcher patterns, integrating Google Sheets/Drive APIs, or creating batch processing systems. Covers patterns from rosen-scraper, image-analyzer, and
Open skill

