/053-design-simple-rules
Use when Java design, refactoring, or implementation tradeoffs should be evaluated with Kent Beck's simple design rules, including passes the tests, reveals intention, has no duplication, and has the fewest elements. This should trigger for requests such as Apply simple design
$ npx -y skills add jabrena/plinth --skill 053-design-simple-rules --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/053-design-simple-rules
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use when Java design, refactoring, or implementation tradeoffs should be evaluated with Kent Beck's simple design rules, including passes the tests, reveals intention, has no duplication, and has the fewest elements. This should trigger for requests such as Apply simple design
SKILL.md
053-design-simple-rules.SKILL.mdname: 053-design-simple-rules
description: Use when Java design, refactoring, or implementation tradeoffs should be evaluated with Kent Beck's simple design rules, including passes the tests, reveals intention, has no duplication, and has the fewest elements. This should trigger for requests such as Apply simple design rules; Review this design with Beck's rules; Choose between these refactoring options; Keep this Java design simple. Part of Plinth Toolkit
license: Apache-2.0
metadata:
author: Juan Antonio Breña Moral
version: 0.18.0
Simple Design Rules
Guide Java developers through Kent Beck's simple design rules when evaluating design and refactoring choices. **This is an interactive SKILL**.
**What is covered in this Skill?**
- Using tests as the first correctness boundary before design cleanup
- Revealing intention and maximizing clarity before abstraction pressure
- Reducing duplication without hiding domain meaning or worsening readability
- Treating fewer elements as the final simplification pressure after correctness, clarity, and duplication
- Comparing Java design and refactoring options with the ordered rules
- Reporting the chosen option, tradeoffs, validation signal, and remaining risk
Constraints
Apply simple design rules in priority order, and do not optimize later rules by weakening earlier rules.
- **MUST** read `references/053-design-simple-rules.md` before applying the rules
- **MUST** evaluate the rules in this order: passes the tests, reveals intention, has no duplication, has the fewest elements
- **MUST** treat passing tests as the correctness boundary before design cleanup
- **MUST** prefer clear intention over abstraction for its own sake
- **MUST** reduce duplication only when the result preserves or improves clarity
- **MUST** consider fewer elements only after correctness, clarity, and duplication have been addressed
When to use this skill
- Apply simple design rules
- Use Beck's simple design rules
- Review this design with simple design rules
- Choose between these refactoring options
- Keep this Java design simple
- Does this design pass the simple design rules?
Workflow
1. **Anchor Correctness**
Read `references/053-design-simple-rules.md`, then identify the behavior under discussion and the tests, characterization checks, build checks, or manual evidence that define whether the code works.
2. **Reveal Intention**
Evaluate whether names, types, responsibilities, control flow, API shape, and test descriptions make the domain decision clear to a future maintainer.
3. **Reduce Duplication Carefully**
Find repeated knowledge, policy, mappings, validation, queries, or workflow decisions. Remove duplication only when the abstraction keeps the intent easier to understand.
4. **Minimize Elements Last**
After correctness, clarity, and duplication are handled, remove unnecessary classes, methods, parameters, branches, layers, configuration, or indirection that no longer pay for themselves.
5. **Compare Options and Report**
Compare available design or refactoring options against the ordered rules. Recommend the option that satisfies the earlier rules best, describe rejected tradeoffs, and name the verification signal.
Reference
For detailed guidance, examples, and constraints, see [references/053-design-simple-rules.md](references/053-design-simple-rules.md).
Read more
name: 053-design-simple-rules description: Use when Java design, refactoring, or implementation tradeoffs should be evaluated with Kent Beck's simple design rules, including passes the tests, reveals intention, has no duplication, and has the fewest elements. This should trigger for requests such as Apply simple design rules; Review this design with Beck's rules; Choose between these refactoring options; Keep this Java design simple. Part of Plinth Toolkit license: Apache-2.0 metadata: author: Juan Antonio Breña Moral version: 0.18.0
Simple Design Rules
Guide Java developers through Kent Beck's simple design rules when evaluating design and refactoring choices. **This is an interactive SKILL**.
**What is covered in this Skill?**
- Using tests as the first correctness boundary before design cleanup
- Revealing intention and maximizing clarity before abstraction pressure
- Reducing duplication without hiding domain meaning or worsening readability
- Treating fewer elements as the final simplification pressure after correctness, clarity, and duplication
- Comparing Java design and refactoring options with the ordered rules
- Reporting the chosen option, tradeoffs, validation signal, and remaining risk
Constraints
Apply simple design rules in priority order, and do not optimize later rules by weakening earlier rules.
- **MUST** read `references/053-design-simple-rules.md` before applying the rules
- **MUST** evaluate the rules in this order: passes the tests, reveals intention, has no duplication, has the fewest elements
- **MUST** treat passing tests as the correctness boundary before design cleanup
- **MUST** prefer clear intention over abstraction for its own sake
- **MUST** reduce duplication only when the result preserves or improves clarity
- **MUST** consider fewer elements only after correctness, clarity, and duplication have been addressed
When to use this skill
- Apply simple design rules
- Use Beck's simple design rules
- Review this design with simple design rules
- Choose between these refactoring options
- Keep this Java design simple
- Does this design pass the simple design rules?
Workflow
1. **Anchor Correctness**
Read `references/053-design-simple-rules.md`, then identify the behavior under discussion and the tests, characterization checks, build checks, or manual evidence that define whether the code works.
2. **Reveal Intention**
Evaluate whether names, types, responsibilities, control flow, API shape, and test descriptions make the domain decision clear to a future maintainer.
3. **Reduce Duplication Carefully**
Find repeated knowledge, policy, mappings, validation, queries, or workflow decisions. Remove duplication only when the abstraction keeps the intent easier to understand.
4. **Minimize Elements Last**
After correctness, clarity, and duplication are handled, remove unnecessary classes, methods, parameters, branches, layers, configuration, or indirection that no longer pay for themselves.
5. **Compare Options and Report**
Compare available design or refactoring options against the ordered rules. Recommend the option that satisfies the earlier rules best, describe rejected tradeoffs, and name the verification signal.
Reference
For detailed guidance, examples, and constraints, see [references/053-design-simple-rules.md](references/053-design-simple-rules.md).
Languages: Español · 中文 Help this project grow: Become a sponsor
Other skills on plinth.
- /001-commands-inventory
Use when you need to generate a checklist document with embedded commands inventory, following the embedded template exactly and producing INVENTORY-COMMANDS-JAVA.md in the project root. This should trigger for requests such as Create embedded commands inventory checklist;
Open skill - /002-agents-inventory
Use when you need to generate a checklist document with embedded agents inventory, following the embedded template exactly and producing INVENTORY-AGENTS-JAVA.md in the project root. This should trigger for requests such as Create embedded agents inventory checklist; Generate
Open skill - /003-skills-inventory
Use when you need to generate a checklist document with Java system prompts from skills.xml, following the embedded section template and producing INVENTORY-SKILLS-JAVA.md. This should trigger for requests such as Create Java system prompts checklist; Generate
Open skill - /004-commands-installation
Use when you need to install the embedded project commands into command directories (.github/commands, .claude/commands, .cursor/command, .codex/commands), selecting the destination interactively and copying the embedded command definitions from project assets. This should
Open skill - /005-agents-installation
Use when you need to install the embedded robot agents into .github/agents, .claude/agents, .cursor/agents, or .codex/agents, selecting the destination interactively and copying the embedded agent definitions from project assets. This should trigger for requests such as Install
Open skill - /012-agile-epic
Guides the creation of agile epics with comprehensive definition including business value, success criteria, and breakdown into user stories. Use when the user wants to create an agile epic, define large bodies of work, break down features into user stories, or document
Open skill

