/022-root-cause-analysis
Use when a framed problem needs root-cause investigation rather than a symptom-level fix, applying Five Whys, Fishbone (Ishikawa), Current Reality Tree, and constraint identification. This should trigger when an issue's Root Cause Analysis point of view needs evaluation, or when
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add jabrena/plinth --skill 022-root-cause-analysis --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add jabrena/plinth --skill 022-root-cause-analysis -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add jabrena/plinth --skill 022-root-cause-analysis -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add jabrena/plinth --skill 022-root-cause-analysis -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add jabrena/plinth --skill 022-root-cause-analysis -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add jabrena/plinth --skill 022-root-cause-analysis -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add jabrena/plinth --skill 022-root-cause-analysis -a windsurf -y
SKILL.md
022-root-cause-analysis.SKILL.mdname: 022-root-cause-analysis
description: Use when a framed problem needs root-cause investigation rather than a symptom-level fix, applying Five Whys, Fishbone (Ishikawa), Current Reality Tree, and constraint identification. This should trigger when an issue's Root Cause Analysis point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to find the root cause of a problem before proposing a fix. Part of Plinth Toolkit
license: Apache-2.0
metadata:
author: Juan Antonio Breña Moral
version: 0.19.0
Root Cause Analysis
Guide the identification of root causes, not symptoms, for a framed problem, using Five Whys, Fishbone (Ishikawa), Current Reality Tree, and constraint identification. **This is an interactive SKILL**.
**What is covered in this Skill?**
- Five Whys for a linear causal chain from a symptom to a root cause
- Fishbone (Ishikawa) for categorized candidate causes across multiple dimensions
- Current Reality Tree for interconnected causes and effects with a small number of core problems
- Constraint identification for the limiting factor holding the current state in place
- Choosing the technique(s) proportionate to the problem's complexity
- Feeding root-cause findings into `023-assumption-analysis` and the remaining Functional Specification lenses
Constraints
Distinguish root causes from symptoms before recommending a fix. When this technique is orchestrated by another workflow, the orchestrator owns clarifying-question sequencing; when applied standalone, ask directly.
- **MUST** read `references/022-root-cause-analysis.md` before applying Root Cause Analysis guidance
- **MUST** distinguish a symptom (an observed effect) from a root cause (the condition that produces it)
- **MUST** apply Five Whys as a chain of "why" questions grounded in evidence from the problem frame, not assumption
- **MUST** apply Fishbone to organize candidate causes into categories (for example people, process, technology, environment) when more than one causal dimension is plausible
- **MUST** apply Current Reality Tree when multiple symptoms may share one or a small number of core problems connected by cause-effect relationships
- **MUST** identify the constraint limiting the current state, not only the most visible cause
- **MUST NOT** invent a root cause when the available evidence is vague or ambiguous; flag the gap for a clarifying question instead
When to use this skill
- Find the root cause of this problem
- Apply Five Whys to this issue
- Build a Fishbone diagram for this problem
- Use Current Reality Tree to connect these symptoms
- Identify the constraint limiting the current state
- Draft the Root Cause Analysis section of a Functional Specification
Workflow
1. **Read the Reference**
Read `references/022-root-cause-analysis.md`, then identify the symptom(s) evidenced by the problem frame.
2. **Apply Five Whys**
Chain "why" questions from the symptom toward an evidenced root cause, stopping when further "why" steps would require guessing.
3. **Apply Fishbone When Multiple Dimensions Are Plausible**
Organize candidate causes into categories when more than one causal dimension (people, process, technology, environment) is plausible.
4. **Apply Current Reality Tree When Symptoms Interconnect**
Connect multiple symptoms to a small number of shared core problems through cause-effect relationships when the symptoms appear related.
5. **Identify the Constraint**
Name the constraint limiting the current state, distinct from the most visible or most recently reported cause.
6. **Report the Root Cause Findings**
Report findings using Five Whys, Fishbone, Current Reality Tree, and the identified constraint, and flag any finding left open pending a clarifying answer.
Reference
For detailed guidance, examples, and constraints, see [references/022-root-cause-analysis.md](references/022-root-cause-analysis.md).
Read more
name: 022-root-cause-analysis description: Use when a framed problem needs root-cause investigation rather than a symptom-level fix, applying Five Whys, Fishbone (Ishikawa), Current Reality Tree, and constraint identification. This should trigger when an issue's Root Cause Analysis point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to find the root cause of a problem before proposing a fix. Part of Plinth Toolkit license: Apache-2.0 metadata: author: Juan Antonio Breña Moral version: 0.19.0
Root Cause Analysis
Guide the identification of root causes, not symptoms, for a framed problem, using Five Whys, Fishbone (Ishikawa), Current Reality Tree, and constraint identification. **This is an interactive SKILL**.
**What is covered in this Skill?**
- Five Whys for a linear causal chain from a symptom to a root cause
- Fishbone (Ishikawa) for categorized candidate causes across multiple dimensions
- Current Reality Tree for interconnected causes and effects with a small number of core problems
- Constraint identification for the limiting factor holding the current state in place
- Choosing the technique(s) proportionate to the problem's complexity
- Feeding root-cause findings into `023-assumption-analysis` and the remaining Functional Specification lenses
Constraints
Distinguish root causes from symptoms before recommending a fix. When this technique is orchestrated by another workflow, the orchestrator owns clarifying-question sequencing; when applied standalone, ask directly.
- **MUST** read `references/022-root-cause-analysis.md` before applying Root Cause Analysis guidance
- **MUST** distinguish a symptom (an observed effect) from a root cause (the condition that produces it)
- **MUST** apply Five Whys as a chain of "why" questions grounded in evidence from the problem frame, not assumption
- **MUST** apply Fishbone to organize candidate causes into categories (for example people, process, technology, environment) when more than one causal dimension is plausible
- **MUST** apply Current Reality Tree when multiple symptoms may share one or a small number of core problems connected by cause-effect relationships
- **MUST** identify the constraint limiting the current state, not only the most visible cause
- **MUST NOT** invent a root cause when the available evidence is vague or ambiguous; flag the gap for a clarifying question instead
When to use this skill
- Find the root cause of this problem
- Apply Five Whys to this issue
- Build a Fishbone diagram for this problem
- Use Current Reality Tree to connect these symptoms
- Identify the constraint limiting the current state
- Draft the Root Cause Analysis section of a Functional Specification
Workflow
1. **Read the Reference**
Read `references/022-root-cause-analysis.md`, then identify the symptom(s) evidenced by the problem frame.
2. **Apply Five Whys**
Chain "why" questions from the symptom toward an evidenced root cause, stopping when further "why" steps would require guessing.
3. **Apply Fishbone When Multiple Dimensions Are Plausible**
Organize candidate causes into categories when more than one causal dimension (people, process, technology, environment) is plausible.
4. **Apply Current Reality Tree When Symptoms Interconnect**
Connect multiple symptoms to a small number of shared core problems through cause-effect relationships when the symptoms appear related.
5. **Identify the Constraint**
Name the constraint limiting the current state, distinct from the most visible or most recently reported cause.
6. **Report the Root Cause Findings**
Report findings using Five Whys, Fishbone, Current Reality Tree, and the identified constraint, and flag any finding left open pending a clarifying answer.
Reference
For detailed guidance, examples, and constraints, see [references/022-root-cause-analysis.md](references/022-root-cause-analysis.md).
Other skills on plinth.
More skills from other plugins.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
ask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Questions about 022-root-cause-analysis.
- Which coding agents can use 022-root-cause-analysis?
- 022-root-cause-analysis installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.

