Skip to content
Development
Skill

/verifying-work

Gates completion claims with mandatory evidence — no "should work" or "probably passes" without fresh verification output. Use when verifying test results, confirming builds pass, checking linter output, or validating acceptance criteria.

From plugin
rageatc-oss
1045 skills11 agents
Install
$ npx -y skills add isvlasov/rageatc-oss --skill verifying-work --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/verifying-work

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Gates completion claims with mandatory evidence — no "should work" or "probably passes" without fresh verification output. Use when verifying test results, confirming builds pass, checking linter output, or validating acceptance criteria.

SKILL.md

verifying-work.SKILL.md
name: verifying-work
description: Gates completion claims with mandatory evidence — no "should work" or "probably passes" without fresh verification output. Use when verifying test results, confirming builds pass, checking linter output, or validating acceptance criteria.

Verifying Work

Overview

Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.

**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.

**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**

The Iron Law

NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE

If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.

The Gate Function

BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:

1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
   - If NO: State actual status with evidence
   - If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim

Skip any step = lying, not verifying

Common Failures

| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient | |-------|----------|----------------| | Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" | | Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation | | Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good | | Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed | | Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once | | Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" | | Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |

Red Flags - STOP

  • Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
  • Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
  • About to commit/push/PR without verification
  • Trusting agent success reports
  • Relying on partial verification
  • Thinking "just this once"
  • **ANY wording implying success without having run verification**

Rationalisation Prevention

| Excuse | Reality | |--------|---------| | "Should work now" | RUN the verification | | "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence | | "Just this once" | No exceptions | | "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler | | "Agent said success" | Verify independently | | "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing | | "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |

Key Patterns

**Tests:**

✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"

**Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):**

✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)

**Build:**

✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)

**Requirements:**

✅ Re-read spec → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, task complete"

**Agent delegation:**

✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report

Status Code Reporting

When reporting status codes to the orchestrator, the same gate applies:

| Status Code | Requires | |-------------|----------| | DONE | All acceptance criteria verified with evidence | | DONE_WITH_CONCERNS | Acceptance criteria verified, concerns documented with evidence | | NEEDS_CONTEXT | Specific gap identified, not guessed | | BLOCKED | Blocker reproduced and documented |

Never report DONE without having run verification. Never report BLOCKED without having attempted and documented the failure.

When To Apply

**ALWAYS before:**

  • ANY variation of success/completion claims
  • ANY expression of satisfaction
  • ANY positive statement about work state
  • Reporting status codes to orchestrator
  • Committing, PR creation, task completion
  • Moving to next task

**Rule applies to:**

  • Exact phrases
  • Paraphrases and synonyms
  • Implications of success
  • ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness

The Bottom Line

**No shortcuts for verification.**

Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.

This is non-negotiable.

Read more
Ships withrageatc-oss

Rage Against The C - pick your own C to rage against. Two plugins for Claude Code / Cowork, built on the idea that we're using AI wrong: the speed of its output tricks us into rushing the input.

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on rageatc-oss.