brooks-harness
Maintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin itself. Runs a sequential subagent pipeline — author → eval → QA →…
PR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to review code, check a PR, shares a diff or pastes code
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add hyhmrright/brooks-lint --skill brooks-review --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add hyhmrright/brooks-lint --skill brooks-review -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add hyhmrright/brooks-lint --skill brooks-review -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add hyhmrright/brooks-lint --skill brooks-review -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add hyhmrright/brooks-lint --skill brooks-review -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add hyhmrright/brooks-lint --skill brooks-review -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add hyhmrright/brooks-lint --skill brooks-review -a windsurf -y
name: brooks-review description: > PR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to review code, check a PR, shares a diff or pastes code asking "does this look right?" / "any issues here?" / "ready to merge?", or asks for feedback on a function, class, or file. Also triggers when user mentions: code smells / refactoring / clean architecture / DDD / SOLID principles / Hyrum's Law / deep modules / tactical programming / conceptual integrity / Brooks's Law / Mythical Man-Month / second system effect. Do NOT trigger for: questions about how to write code from scratch, language syntax questions, or framework/tool questions where no existing code is shared. metadata: opencode/slash: "true"
Read in order:
1. `../_shared/common.md` — Iron Law, Project Config, Report Template, Health Score 2. `../_shared/source-coverage.md` — book coverage, exceptions, tradeoffs 3. `../_shared/decay-risks.md` — symptom definitions and source attributions 4. `../_shared/test-decay-risks.md` — test risk definitions for the Quick Test Check 5. `pr-review-guide.md` (this directory) — the analysis process
**Scope:** if the user did not specify files or paste code, apply Auto Scope Detection (`../_shared/common.md`) first.
1. Understand the review scope, then scan for each decay risk in the order specified (Steps 1–6 of the guide) 2. Run the Quick Test Check (Step 7 of the guide) — skip for docs-only or non-production changes 3. Apply the Iron Law to every finding 4. Output using the Report Template from common.md
**Mode line in report:** `PR Review`
Portable AI code quality reviews for Codex, Cursor, Copilot and other coding agents: six Agent Skills for architecture, technical debt, tests and remediation.
Maintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin itself. Runs a sequential subagent pipeline — author → eval → QA →…
Scaffold a new brooks-lint analysis skill so it passes `npm run validate` and `npm run evals` on the first try — generates…
Cut a brooks-lint release: set the version in package.json, propagate it across all four plugin manifests and every…
Architecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase,…
Tech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring…
Combined codebase health dashboard that scores a project across all four quality dimensions — PR quality, architecture, tech…
Performs AI-powered code review on Git changes using the `ocr` CLI from alibaba/open-code-review. Use when the user asks to…
Address all valid review comments on a PR for the current branch in the streamlit/streamlit repo. Covers both inline review…
Build or update the code review knowledge graph. Run this first to initialize, or let hooks keep it updated automatically.
Maps the `hunkdiff/extension` authoring surface for Hunk, the terminal diff viewer — hiding or reordering reviewed files, docked…