/retrospective
Structured retrospective after completing a delivery increment or diamond. Captures learning for continuous improvement.
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add haabe/mycelium --skill retrospective --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add haabe/mycelium --skill retrospective -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add haabe/mycelium --skill retrospective -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add haabe/mycelium --skill retrospective -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add haabe/mycelium --skill retrospective -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add haabe/mycelium --skill retrospective -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add haabe/mycelium --skill retrospective -a windsurf -y
SKILL.md
retrospective.SKILL.mdname: retrospective
description: "Structured retrospective after completing a delivery increment or diamond. Captures learning for continuous improvement."
metadata:
instruction_budget: "58"
framework_dependency: "mycelium"
framework_dependency_note: "This skill is designed to run within the Mycelium framework (https://github.com/haabe/mycelium). Standalone use will skip the canvas state, theory gates, and harness behavior the skill assumes. Install: /plugin install mycelium@haabe-mycelium."
Retrospective
Run after every completed **cycle**: a solution leaf reaching a terminal state (launched, archived, killed), or a framework-development arc that shipped. Not only after a diamond completes — a diamond at L0 to L2 can stay open for months while cycles close under it weekly. Measured on the dogfood repo (2026-08-30): 17 cycles in 116 days, median 3.5 days apart, while every diamond stayed open the whole time; the earlier wording ("after every completed delivery diamond or significant milestone") named two units forty times apart and the load-bearing one was the vague one. Source: Forsgren (learning culture).
Preflight: Read target canvas file(s) before any Write/Edit
**Hard rule.** Before issuing `Write` or `Edit` against any `.claude/canvas/*.yml`, use the **Read tool** on that file in this session. Claude Code's Read-before-Write check requires the `Read` tool specifically — `cat`/`head`/`grep` via Bash do NOT satisfy it.
**Edit vs Write — different cost profiles** (verified 2026-05-14):
- **`Edit`** (exact-string replacement): `Read` with `limit: 1` satisfies the check at ~50 tokens. State-tracking is per-file, not per-byte — subsequent `Edit` calls work anywhere in the file. Use this for partial updates against large canvas files (e.g., `purpose.yml` at 800+ lines).
- **`Write`** (full replacement): do a **full Read** first. Write obliterates the file; you should see what you're about to replace. The `limit:1` shortcut is *not* appropriate here.
**ID-bearing entries — scan the ID space before assigning** (added 2026-05-15, v0.23.19): When adding a new component, opportunity, solution, or any other ID-bearing entry to a canvas file, run a Bash grep first to confirm the next ID in your prefix sequence is actually free:
grep -o "<prefix>-[0-9][0-9]*" .claude/canvas/<file>.yml | sort -u -t- -k2 -n | tail -3
Replace `<prefix>` with the canvas's ID prefix (`comp` for landscape, `opp` for opportunities, `sol` for solutions, `ht` for human-tasks, etc.). Then pick the next free integer, **matching the zero-padding already used in that file**. The sort is NUMERIC (`-t- -k2 -n`) rather than lexical, and that is not pedantry: a plain `sort -u` orders `ht-1` after `ht-080`, so on a canvas with inconsistent padding it reports the wrong maximum and the next ID collides. Verified on the dogfood repo 2026-08-13, where lexical sort returned `ht-1` as the highest human-task ID against an actual `ht-080`. `grep -o` is also deliberate: it matches IDs wherever they appear, including cross-references and prose, so an ID that was promised somewhere but not yet defined is not handed out twice. `validate_canvas.py` has a per-file duplicate-ID check (it reports `duplicate id '<id>'`) that catches the failure on CI, but a duplicate can persist in the working tree for days if CI isn't run between edit and discovery; that happened on 2026-05-15, when a duplicate ID was created in `landscape.yml`.
Original failure mode: anti-pattern #7 instance #5, 2026-05-09 — agent conflated Bash `head` with the Read tool, lost ~14k tokens to a Write-fail → remedial-full-Read → re-Write loop. The `limit:1` discipline (graduated 2026-05-14, v0.23.18) prevents the second-order cost where the agent *correctly* follows the rule but full-Reads every time. The ID-scan discipline (graduated 2026-05-15, v0.23.19) prevents the related class where the agent reads enough of the file to satisfy the Edit check but not enough to see existing ID assignments — kin to anti-pattern #8 (Stale State Read).
If this skill writes to multiple canvas files, register each one first (limit:1 for Edit-only paths; full Read for Write paths) AND ID-scan any prefix you intend to assign.
See `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/engine/agent-operating-contract.md` *Canvas writes — Read before Write* for the canonical rule.
Workflow
Run these steps IN ORDER. Do not skip any step. **Step 1 (cycle recording) MUST be completed FIRST — before any reflective analysis.**
Step 1. Record Cycle in `.claude/canvas/cycle-history.yml` AND Decision Log (MANDATORY — DO THIS FIRST)
**This step is critical.** Without it, the learning metabolism has no data. You MUST do BOTH parts (5a and 5b).
Step 5a. Write cycle record to `.claude/canvas/cycle-history.yml`
Find the leaf_id and opportunity_id for the delivered solution (from `.claude/canvas/opportunities.yml` or `.claude/canvas/gist.yml`). Then write a cycle record:
- cycle_id: cycle-NNN
leaf_id: "opp-XXX-sol-X" # From opportunities.yml
opportunity_id: "opp-XXX" # Parent opportunity
diamond_id: "d-XXX" # From .claude/diamonds/active.yml
completed_at: "YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ"
outcome: shipped | partial | failed | discarded
cycle_class: product-leaf | meta-dogfood | observation # REQUIRED — see engine/cycle-learning.md#cycle-class
predicted:
ice_score: {i: X, c: X.XX, e: X, total: X} # total = i x c x e (Gilad's ICE; c from his Confidence Meter). REQUIRED recorded when cycle_class=product-leaf; permitted all-zero for meta-dogfood/observation (state why in notes)
feasibility_risk: low | medium | high # From four_risks
effort_estimate: "X days/weeks" # Original estimate
actual:
effort: "X days/weeks" # How long it actually took
dora: # From /mycelium:dora-check or known metrics
deploy_frequency: "..."
lead_time: "..."
chRead more
name: retrospective description: "Structured retrospective after completing a delivery increment or diamond. Captures learning for continuous improvement." metadata: instruction_budget: "58" framework_dependency: "mycelium" framework_dependency_note: "This skill is designed to run within the Mycelium framework (https://github.com/haabe/mycelium). Standalone use will skip the canvas state, theory gates, and harness behavior the skill assumes. Install: /plugin install mycelium@haabe-mycelium."
Retrospective
Run after every completed **cycle**: a solution leaf reaching a terminal state (launched, archived, killed), or a framework-development arc that shipped. Not only after a diamond completes — a diamond at L0 to L2 can stay open for months while cycles close under it weekly. Measured on the dogfood repo (2026-08-30): 17 cycles in 116 days, median 3.5 days apart, while every diamond stayed open the whole time; the earlier wording ("after every completed delivery diamond or significant milestone") named two units forty times apart and the load-bearing one was the vague one. Source: Forsgren (learning culture).
Preflight: Read target canvas file(s) before any Write/Edit
**Hard rule.** Before issuing `Write` or `Edit` against any `.claude/canvas/*.yml`, use the **Read tool** on that file in this session. Claude Code's Read-before-Write check requires the `Read` tool specifically — `cat`/`head`/`grep` via Bash do NOT satisfy it.
**Edit vs Write — different cost profiles** (verified 2026-05-14):
- **`Edit`** (exact-string replacement): `Read` with `limit: 1` satisfies the check at ~50 tokens. State-tracking is per-file, not per-byte — subsequent `Edit` calls work anywhere in the file. Use this for partial updates against large canvas files (e.g., `purpose.yml` at 800+ lines).
- **`Write`** (full replacement): do a **full Read** first. Write obliterates the file; you should see what you're about to replace. The `limit:1` shortcut is *not* appropriate here.
**ID-bearing entries — scan the ID space before assigning** (added 2026-05-15, v0.23.19): When adding a new component, opportunity, solution, or any other ID-bearing entry to a canvas file, run a Bash grep first to confirm the next ID in your prefix sequence is actually free:
grep -o "<prefix>-[0-9][0-9]*" .claude/canvas/<file>.yml | sort -u -t- -k2 -n | tail -3
Replace `<prefix>` with the canvas's ID prefix (`comp` for landscape, `opp` for opportunities, `sol` for solutions, `ht` for human-tasks, etc.). Then pick the next free integer, **matching the zero-padding already used in that file**. The sort is NUMERIC (`-t- -k2 -n`) rather than lexical, and that is not pedantry: a plain `sort -u` orders `ht-1` after `ht-080`, so on a canvas with inconsistent padding it reports the wrong maximum and the next ID collides. Verified on the dogfood repo 2026-08-13, where lexical sort returned `ht-1` as the highest human-task ID against an actual `ht-080`. `grep -o` is also deliberate: it matches IDs wherever they appear, including cross-references and prose, so an ID that was promised somewhere but not yet defined is not handed out twice. `validate_canvas.py` has a per-file duplicate-ID check (it reports `duplicate id '<id>'`) that catches the failure on CI, but a duplicate can persist in the working tree for days if CI isn't run between edit and discovery; that happened on 2026-05-15, when a duplicate ID was created in `landscape.yml`.
Original failure mode: anti-pattern #7 instance #5, 2026-05-09 — agent conflated Bash `head` with the Read tool, lost ~14k tokens to a Write-fail → remedial-full-Read → re-Write loop. The `limit:1` discipline (graduated 2026-05-14, v0.23.18) prevents the second-order cost where the agent *correctly* follows the rule but full-Reads every time. The ID-scan discipline (graduated 2026-05-15, v0.23.19) prevents the related class where the agent reads enough of the file to satisfy the Edit check but not enough to see existing ID assignments — kin to anti-pattern #8 (Stale State Read).
If this skill writes to multiple canvas files, register each one first (limit:1 for Edit-only paths; full Read for Write paths) AND ID-scan any prefix you intend to assign.
See `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/engine/agent-operating-contract.md` *Canvas writes — Read before Write* for the canonical rule.
Workflow
Run these steps IN ORDER. Do not skip any step. **Step 1 (cycle recording) MUST be completed FIRST — before any reflective analysis.**
Step 1. Record Cycle in `.claude/canvas/cycle-history.yml` AND Decision Log (MANDATORY — DO THIS FIRST)
**This step is critical.** Without it, the learning metabolism has no data. You MUST do BOTH parts (5a and 5b).
Step 5a. Write cycle record to `.claude/canvas/cycle-history.yml`
Find the leaf_id and opportunity_id for the delivered solution (from `.claude/canvas/opportunities.yml` or `.claude/canvas/gist.yml`). Then write a cycle record:
- cycle_id: cycle-NNN
leaf_id: "opp-XXX-sol-X" # From opportunities.yml
opportunity_id: "opp-XXX" # Parent opportunity
diamond_id: "d-XXX" # From .claude/diamonds/active.yml
completed_at: "YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ"
outcome: shipped | partial | failed | discarded
cycle_class: product-leaf | meta-dogfood | observation # REQUIRED — see engine/cycle-learning.md#cycle-class
predicted:
ice_score: {i: X, c: X.XX, e: X, total: X} # total = i x c x e (Gilad's ICE; c from his Confidence Meter). REQUIRED recorded when cycle_class=product-leaf; permitted all-zero for meta-dogfood/observation (state why in notes)
feasibility_risk: low | medium | high # From four_risks
effort_estimate: "X days/weeks" # Original estimate
actual:
effort: "X days/weeks" # How long it actually took
dora: # From /mycelium:dora-check or known metrics
deploy_frequency: "..."
lead_time: "..."
chMycelium won't make your idea good. It keeps you and your agent honest about whether it is, from first idea to market. Built on Claude Code, where the gates are structural. The files and skills port to opencode, Codex and Cursor. Outcome over output.
Other skills on mycelium.
More skills from other plugins.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
ask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Questions about retrospective.
- Which coding agents can use retrospective?
- retrospective installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.

