/filesystem-context

name: filesystem-context
description: "This skill should be used when agent work needs file-backed context: durable scratchpads, tool-output offloading, just-in-time discovery, cross-agent handoff files, filesystem memory, or cleanup policies for context stored outside the prompt."

Filesystem-Based Context Engineering

Use the filesystem as the primary overflow layer for agent context because context windows are limited while tasks often require more information than fits in a single window. Files let agents store, retrieve, and update an effectively unlimited amount of context through a single interface.

Prefer dynamic context discovery -- pulling relevant context on demand -- over static inclusion, because static context consumes tokens regardless of relevance and crowds out space for task-specific information.

When to Activate

Activate this skill when:

• Tool outputs are bloating the context window
• Agents need to persist state across long trajectories
• Sub-agents must share information without direct message passing
• Tasks require more context than fits in the window
• Building agents that learn and update their own instructions
• Implementing scratch pads for intermediate results
• Terminal outputs or logs need to be accessible to agents

Do not activate this skill for adjacent work owned by other skills:

• Semantic cross-session memory, entity tracking, or temporal knowledge graphs: `memory-systems`.
• Conversation summarization, compaction, or durable handoff wording: `context-compression`.
• Token-efficiency tactics that do not require file-backed storage: `context-optimization`.
• Multi-agent topology or handoff protocol design: `multi-agent-patterns`.

Core Concepts

Diagnose context failures against these four modes, because each requires a different filesystem remedy:

1. **Missing context** -- needed information is absent from the total available context. Fix by persisting tool outputs and intermediate results to files so nothing is lost. 2. **Under-retrieved context** -- retrieved content fails to encapsulate what the agent needs. Fix by structuring files for targeted retrieval (grep-friendly formats, clear section headers). 3. **Over-retrieved context** -- retrieved content far exceeds what is needed, wasting tokens and degrading attention. Fix by offloading bulk content to files and returning compact references. 4. **Buried context** -- niche information is hidden across many files. Fix by combining glob and grep for structural search alongside semantic search for conceptual queries.

Use the filesystem as the persistent layer that addresses all four: write once, store durably, retrieve selectively.

Detailed Topics

The Static vs Dynamic Context Trade-off

Treat static context (system instructions, tool definitions, critical rules) as expensive real estate -- it consumes tokens on every turn regardless of relevance. As agents accumulate capabilities, static context grows and crowds out dynamic information.

Use dynamic context discovery instead: include only minimal static pointers (names, one-line descriptions, file paths) and load full content with search tools when relevant. This is more token-efficient and often improves response quality by reducing contradictory or irrelevant information in the window.

Accept the trade-off: dynamic discovery requires the model to recognize when it needs more context. Current frontier models handle this well, but less capable models may fail to trigger loads. When in doubt, err toward including critical safety or correctness constraints statically.

Pattern 1: Filesystem as Scratch Pad

Redirect large tool outputs to files instead of returning them directly to context, because a single web search or database query can dump thousands of tokens into message history where they persist for the entire conversation.

Write the output to a scratch file, extract a compact summary, and return a file reference. The agent then uses targeted retrieval (grep for patterns, read with line ranges) to access only what it needs.

def handle_tool_output(output: str, threshold: int = 2000) -> str:
    if len(output) < threshold:
        return output

    file_path = f"scratch/{tool_name}_{timestamp}.txt"
    write_file(file_path, output)

    key_summary = extract_summary(output, max_tokens=200)
    return f"[Output written to {file_path}. Summary: {key_summary}]"

Use grep to search the offloaded file and read_file with line ranges to retrieve targeted sections, because this preserves full output for later reference while keeping only ~100 tokens in the active context.

Pattern 2: Plan Persistence

Write plans to the filesystem because long-horizon tasks lose coherence when plans fall out of attention or get summarized away. The agent re-reads its plan at any point, restoring awareness of the objective and progress.

Store plans in structured format so they are both human-readable and machine-parseable:

# scratch/current_plan.yaml
objective: "Refactor authentication module"
status: in_progress
steps:
  - id: 1
    description: "Audit current auth endpoints"
    status: completed
  - id: 2
    description: "Design new token validation flow"
    status: in_progress
  - id: 3
    description: "Implement and test changes"
    status: pending

Re-read the plan at the start of each turn or after any context refresh to re-orient, because this acts as "manipulating attention through recitation."

Pattern 3: Sub-Agent Communication via Filesystem

Route sub-agent findings through the filesystem instead of message passing, because multi-hop message chains degrade information through summarization at each hop ("game of telephone").

Have each sub-agent write directly to its own workspace directory. The coordinator reads these files directly, preserving full fidelity:

workspace/
  agents/
    research_agent/
      findings.md
      sources.jsonl
    code_agent/
      changes.md
      test_re