/grc-evidence-flow-diagram
Use when creating a draw.io diagram for evidence collection, evidence lifecycle, audit evidence pipelines, and systems of record in a GRC, security, audit, compliance, privacy, cloud, or risk context.
$ npx -y skills add GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering --skill grc-evidence-flow-diagram --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/grc-evidence-flow-diagram
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use when creating a draw.io diagram for evidence collection, evidence lifecycle, audit evidence pipelines, and systems of record in a GRC, security, audit, compliance, privacy, cloud, or risk context.
SKILL.md
grc-evidence-flow-diagram.SKILL.mdname: grc-evidence-flow-diagram
description: Use when creating a draw.io diagram for evidence collection, evidence lifecycle, audit evidence pipelines, and systems of record in a GRC, security, audit, compliance, privacy, cloud, or risk context.
allowed-tools: Write, Bash, Read, WebFetch
GRC evidence flow diagram
Use this skill to structure the GRC content and visual pattern for evidence collection, evidence lifecycle, audit evidence pipelines, and systems of record. Then use the `drawio` skill to generate the native editable `.drawio` file and optional PNG/SVG/PDF export.
Common Requests
- AWS Config to evidence repository to auditor review
- GitHub branch protection evidence
- quarterly access review lifecycle
Recommended Elements
Include these when relevant:
- evidence sources
- collectors
- repositories
- reviewers
- approvers
- auditors
- retention
- freshness
- cadence
Recommended Output Pattern
Produce a Swimlane evidence lifecycle or evidence data-flow diagram. Choose a layout that matches the audience:
- Executive: compact lifecycle/capability view with business impact labels.
- Auditor/assessor: explicit evidence, owner, control, cadence, and scope labels.
- Practitioner/engineering: operational systems, data paths, automation, failure/exception paths, and implementation detail.
draw.io Instructions
1. Load and follow the `drawio` skill. 2. Generate native mxGraphModel XML directly. Do not generate Mermaid as the final artifact. 3. Use descriptive lowercase hyphenated filenames. 4. Include a legend when colors, edge styles, or containers have compliance meaning. 5. Validate XML well-formedness before finalizing. 6. If PNG/SVG/PDF is requested, export with embedded diagram XML when the draw.io CLI is available.
Visual Conventions
- Blue: systems, platforms, services, and automated collectors.
- Green: implemented controls, approvals, validated evidence, and compliant outcomes.
- Orange/red: risks, findings, exceptions, overdue items, gaps, and failed controls.
- Gray: manual tasks, external parties, optional steps, and out-of-scope areas.
- Dashed containers: audit scope, trust boundaries, authorization boundary, or responsibility boundary.
- Solid edges: primary process or system flow.
- Dashed edges: evidence or attestation flow.
- Dotted edges: optional, manual, exception, or escalation flow.
Quality Bar
- Make ownership explicit.
- Label regulated data, control IDs, frameworks, and evidence repositories when known.
- Show decision criteria where the process branches.
- Avoid generic boxes like "Compliance" without a role, system, artifact, or action.
- Prefer editable source of truth over screenshots.
Read more
name: grc-evidence-flow-diagram description: Use when creating a draw.io diagram for evidence collection, evidence lifecycle, audit evidence pipelines, and systems of record in a GRC, security, audit, compliance, privacy, cloud, or risk context. allowed-tools: Write, Bash, Read, WebFetch
GRC evidence flow diagram
Use this skill to structure the GRC content and visual pattern for evidence collection, evidence lifecycle, audit evidence pipelines, and systems of record. Then use the `drawio` skill to generate the native editable `.drawio` file and optional PNG/SVG/PDF export.
Common Requests
- AWS Config to evidence repository to auditor review
- GitHub branch protection evidence
- quarterly access review lifecycle
Recommended Elements
Include these when relevant:
- evidence sources
- collectors
- repositories
- reviewers
- approvers
- auditors
- retention
- freshness
- cadence
Recommended Output Pattern
Produce a Swimlane evidence lifecycle or evidence data-flow diagram. Choose a layout that matches the audience:
- Executive: compact lifecycle/capability view with business impact labels.
- Auditor/assessor: explicit evidence, owner, control, cadence, and scope labels.
- Practitioner/engineering: operational systems, data paths, automation, failure/exception paths, and implementation detail.
draw.io Instructions
1. Load and follow the `drawio` skill. 2. Generate native mxGraphModel XML directly. Do not generate Mermaid as the final artifact. 3. Use descriptive lowercase hyphenated filenames. 4. Include a legend when colors, edge styles, or containers have compliance meaning. 5. Validate XML well-formedness before finalizing. 6. If PNG/SVG/PDF is requested, export with embedded diagram XML when the draw.io CLI is available.
Visual Conventions
- Blue: systems, platforms, services, and automated collectors.
- Green: implemented controls, approvals, validated evidence, and compliant outcomes.
- Orange/red: risks, findings, exceptions, overdue items, gaps, and failed controls.
- Gray: manual tasks, external parties, optional steps, and out-of-scope areas.
- Dashed containers: audit scope, trust boundaries, authorization boundary, or responsibility boundary.
- Solid edges: primary process or system flow.
- Dashed edges: evidence or attestation flow.
- Dotted edges: optional, manual, exception, or escalation flow.
Quality Bar
- Make ownership explicit.
- Label regulated data, control IDs, frameworks, and evidence repositories when known.
- Show decision criteria where the process branches.
- Avoid generic boxes like "Compliance" without a role, system, artifact, or action.
- Prefer editable source of truth over screenshots.
Open-source GRC Engineering resource for Claude. claude-grc-engineering turns technical evidence from cloud, SaaS, code, and security tools into framework-aligned findings, gap reports, remediation guidance, evidence packages, and OSCAL workflows.
Repo: GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering
Other skills on trust-center.
- /academic-research-companion
Guide a research project through the full academic lifecycle — from raw idea to concrete research question, literature grounding, methodology, writing, feedback, and publication. Use this skill whenever the user shares a research idea, asks to "flesh out" a topic, wants sources
Open skill - /aws-inspector-expert
Expertise in evaluating AWS accounts for compliance — what checks are meaningful, which SCF controls they map to, and how to interpret aws CLI output.
Open skill - /azure-inspector-expert
Expertise in evaluating Azure subscription findings from azure-inspector and mapping them to SCF controls.
Open skill - /crowdstrike-inspector-expert
Interpret CrowdStrike Falcon findings for sensor coverage, policy visibility, and host group scoping.
Open skill - /datadog-inspector-expert
Interpret datadog-inspector findings and translate Datadog monitoring, audit, log-retention, SSO, and RBAC results into GRC evidence and remediation.
Open skill - /drata-inspector-expert
Interpret drata-inspector findings generated from drata-cli workflows and turn Drata control, monitor, evidence, personnel, and integration posture into GRC action.
Open skill