academic-research-comp…
Guide a research project through the full academic lifecycle — from raw idea to concrete research question, literature grounding, methodology, writing,…
Audience-specific tone and format guidance for leadership communications. Use when drafting any /report:* output to tune length, framing, and technical depth to the reader (board, audit committee, CEO, weekly CISO, regulator).
$ npx -y skills add GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering --skill exec-narrative-patterns --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/exec-narrative-patternsContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Audience-specific tone and format guidance for leadership communications. Use when drafting any /report:* output to tune length, framing, and technical depth to the reader (board, audit committee, CEO, weekly CISO, regulator).
name: exec-narrative-patterns description: Audience-specific tone and format guidance for leadership communications. Use when drafting any /report:* output to tune length, framing, and technical depth to the reader (board, audit committee, CEO, weekly CISO, regulator). allowed-tools: Read
Different readers want different things. The same findings should not land the same way in a board deck, a CISO 1:1, and a regulator response.
| Audience | Length budget | Opening line wants | Technical depth | What they skip | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Full board | 1 page max | Strategic posture one-liner | Low. No control IDs in body. | Operational detail, acronyms, tables with >5 rows | | Audit committee | 2 pages | Risk-and-assurance posture | Medium. Control families OK, not IDs. | Strategy monologue, vendor names unless load-bearing | | Risk committee | 2 pages | Residual risk movement | Medium-high. Framework names, risk scoring. | Program branding, tool selection detail | | CEO weekly | Half page | What changed, what's blocking, what's asked | Low. Translate everything. | Framework politics, tool comparisons | | CISO weekly | 1 page | What moved, what's blocked, what's next | High. Control IDs, tool names, owner names fine. | Over-explained context | | Regulator / auditor | As long as needed | Precise scope + evidence | Maximum. IDs, artifact paths, timestamps. | Narrative softening |
**Board and audit committee**
**CEO weekly**
**CISO weekly**
**Regulator / auditor**
If you cannot defend every sentence as "the audience needed this to make a decision," cut it.
If the document opens with context before the point, invert it.
If there are three open items and no ask, you are reporting, not communicating. Add the ask.
Open-source GRC Engineering resource for Claude. claude-grc-engineering turns technical evidence from cloud, SaaS, code, and security tools into framework-aligned findings, gap reports, remediation guidance, evidence packages, and OSCAL workflows.
Repo: GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering
Guide a research project through the full academic lifecycle — from raw idea to concrete research question, literature grounding, methodology, writing,…
Expertise in evaluating AWS accounts for compliance — what checks are meaningful, which SCF controls they map to, and how to interpret aws CLI output.
Use when interpreting AWS Secrets Manager connector output, deciding between inspector and retrieve modes, drafting SCF-mapped controls for rotation / KMS /…
Expertise in evaluating Azure subscription findings from azure-inspector and mapping them to SCF controls.
Interpret CrowdStrike Falcon findings for sensor coverage, policy visibility, and host group scoping.
Interpret datadog-inspector findings and translate Datadog monitoring, audit, log-retention, SSO, and RBAC results into GRC evidence and remediation.