/drata-inspector-expert
Interpret drata-inspector findings generated from drata-cli workflows and turn Drata control, monitor, evidence, personnel, and integration posture into GRC action.
$ npx -y skills add GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering --skill drata-inspector-expert --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/drata-inspector-expert
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Interpret drata-inspector findings generated from drata-cli workflows and turn Drata control, monitor, evidence, personnel, and integration posture into GRC action.
SKILL.md
drata-inspector-expert.SKILL.mdname: drata-inspector-expert
description: Interpret drata-inspector findings generated from drata-cli workflows and turn Drata control, monitor, evidence, personnel, and integration posture into GRC action.
license: MIT
Drata Inspector Expert
Use this skill when reviewing `drata-inspector` output or planning remediation from Drata workflow findings.
Source
`drata-inspector` wraps the MIT-licensed [`drata-cli`](https://github.com/ethanolivertroy/drata-cli) workflow commands. It does not reimplement Drata APIs and does not require Drata MCP.
Output Shape
Findings are written to:
~/.cache/claude-grc/findings/drata-inspector/<run_id>.json
Resource types:
- `drata_tenant`: summary status across controls, monitors, personnel, and integrations
- `drata_control`: failing or incomplete controls from `drata controls failing`
- `drata_monitor`: failed automated checks from `drata monitors failing`
- `drata_connection`: disconnected, failed, or never-connected integrations
- `drata_personnel`: personnel/device compliance issues
- `drata_evidence`: stale or expiring evidence from `drata evidence expiring`
Review Guidance
- Treat Drata-native control codes as source metadata. The connector emits SCF IDs for normalized downstream reporting.
- Keep Drata as the evidence source of record; use these Findings for cross-framework gap analysis and engineering remediation.
- `inconclusive` means a `drata-cli` workflow failed or permissions were insufficient.
Remediation Patterns
- Assign owners for ownerless controls.
- Refresh stale evidence and repair disconnected evidence sources.
- Investigate failed monitors before assuming a control is ineffective.
- Resolve personnel device compliance failures or document approved exceptions.
- Reconnect Drata integrations that feed automated evidence.
Read more
name: drata-inspector-expert description: Interpret drata-inspector findings generated from drata-cli workflows and turn Drata control, monitor, evidence, personnel, and integration posture into GRC action. license: MIT
Drata Inspector Expert
Use this skill when reviewing `drata-inspector` output or planning remediation from Drata workflow findings.
Source
`drata-inspector` wraps the MIT-licensed [`drata-cli`](https://github.com/ethanolivertroy/drata-cli) workflow commands. It does not reimplement Drata APIs and does not require Drata MCP.
Output Shape
Findings are written to:
~/.cache/claude-grc/findings/drata-inspector/<run_id>.json
Resource types:
- `drata_tenant`: summary status across controls, monitors, personnel, and integrations
- `drata_control`: failing or incomplete controls from `drata controls failing`
- `drata_monitor`: failed automated checks from `drata monitors failing`
- `drata_connection`: disconnected, failed, or never-connected integrations
- `drata_personnel`: personnel/device compliance issues
- `drata_evidence`: stale or expiring evidence from `drata evidence expiring`
Review Guidance
- Treat Drata-native control codes as source metadata. The connector emits SCF IDs for normalized downstream reporting.
- Keep Drata as the evidence source of record; use these Findings for cross-framework gap analysis and engineering remediation.
- `inconclusive` means a `drata-cli` workflow failed or permissions were insufficient.
Remediation Patterns
- Assign owners for ownerless controls.
- Refresh stale evidence and repair disconnected evidence sources.
- Investigate failed monitors before assuming a control is ineffective.
- Resolve personnel device compliance failures or document approved exceptions.
- Reconnect Drata integrations that feed automated evidence.
Open-source GRC Engineering resource for Claude. claude-grc-engineering turns technical evidence from cloud, SaaS, code, and security tools into framework-aligned findings, gap reports, remediation guidance, evidence packages, and OSCAL workflows.
Repo: GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering
Other skills on trust-center.
- /academic-research-companion
Guide a research project through the full academic lifecycle — from raw idea to concrete research question, literature grounding, methodology, writing, feedback, and publication. Use this skill whenever the user shares a research idea, asks to "flesh out" a topic, wants sources
Open skill - /aws-inspector-expert
Expertise in evaluating AWS accounts for compliance — what checks are meaningful, which SCF controls they map to, and how to interpret aws CLI output.
Open skill - /azure-inspector-expert
Expertise in evaluating Azure subscription findings from azure-inspector and mapping them to SCF controls.
Open skill - /crowdstrike-inspector-expert
Interpret CrowdStrike Falcon findings for sensor coverage, policy visibility, and host group scoping.
Open skill - /datadog-inspector-expert
Interpret datadog-inspector findings and translate Datadog monitoring, audit, log-retention, SSO, and RBAC results into GRC evidence and remediation.
Open skill - /gcp-inspector-expert
Expertise in evaluating GCP projects for compliance — what checks are meaningful, which SCF controls they map to, and how to interpret gcloud output.
Open skill

