brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior.…
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add getcrew44/crew44 --skill verification-before-completion --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add getcrew44/crew44 --skill verification-before-completion -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add getcrew44/crew44 --skill verification-before-completion -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add getcrew44/crew44 --skill verification-before-completion -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add getcrew44/crew44 --skill verification-before-completion -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add getcrew44/crew44 --skill verification-before-completion -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add getcrew44/crew44 --skill verification-before-completion -a windsurf -y
name: verification-before-completion description: Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.
**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.
**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction: 1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim? 2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete) 3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures 4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim? - If NO: State actual status with evidence - If YES: State claim WITH evidence 5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim Skip any step = lying, not verifying
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient | |-------|----------|----------------| | Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" | | Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation | | Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good | | Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed | | Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once | | Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" | | Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
| Excuse | Reality | |--------|---------| | "Should work now" | RUN the verification | | "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence | | "Just this once" | No exceptions | | "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler | | "Agent said success" | Verify independently | | "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse | | "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing | | "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
**Tests:**
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass" ❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
**Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):**
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass) ❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
**Build:**
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes" ❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
**Requirements:**
✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion ❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
**Agent delegation:**
✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state ❌ Trust agent report
From 24 failure memories:
**ALWAYS before:**
**Rule applies to:**
**No shortcuts for verification.**
Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.
This is non-negotiable.
Orchestrate a crew of specialist AI agents in one local-first workspace. Each role on its best model, with memory and skills that compound. Free, MIT.
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior.…
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of…
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically…
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.