anti-entropy-governanc…
Use when touching retiring old logic, collapsing duplicate owners, removing fallbacks, or schema/persistence/source-of-truth…
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, passing, verified, release-ready, or ready to commit, merge, publish, or hand off.
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add GanyuanRan/Aegis --skill verification-before-completion --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add GanyuanRan/Aegis --skill verification-before-completion -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add GanyuanRan/Aegis --skill verification-before-completion -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add GanyuanRan/Aegis --skill verification-before-completion -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add GanyuanRan/Aegis --skill verification-before-completion -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add GanyuanRan/Aegis --skill verification-before-completion -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add GanyuanRan/Aegis --skill verification-before-completion -a windsurf -y
name: verification-before-completion description: "Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, passing, verified, release-ready, or ready to commit, merge, publish, or hand off."
<EXPLICIT-MODE-GATE> If `activation_mode = "explicit"` or `AEGIS_ACTIVATION_MODE=explicit` is visible and the request names neither Aegis nor this skill, return to the fast path without checklist/ceremony; otherwise continue. </EXPLICIT-MODE-GATE>
Before success claim: classify destructive permission; read sufficient current evidence and run a fresh falsifying check when it is missing or invalidated; read the complete result/scope; select L0/L1/L2. Downgrade for partial, stale, failing, or narrower evidence; never claim complete then verify later.
This pack grants no `GateDecision`, `PolicySnapshot`, evidence sufficiency, requirement acceptance, or completion authority.
Destructive/irreversible work needs scoped permission; broad assent is not scoped permission.
For changed interface/interaction claims, compose `ui-ux-governance` verification; carry results and uncovered user criteria here, keeping one closeout owner.
- Evidence action / check performed: - Result / exit status: - Covered scope: - Uncovered scope: - Residual risk: - Confidence grade: A | B | C
For repairs/optimization, distinguish cause, closure and verified outcome. Check interactions and preserved behavior; investigate consequential unknowns.
Claims need target test and related regression evidence at the triggering seam. A missing seam is an architecture gap; blocked automation needs reproducible manual steps. Both limit confidence.
Read the smallest source for each explicit baseline/artifact/owner/contract/evidence reference. Mark it preserved, rebound to its canonical owner, retired with reason, or rejected for conflict. Leave unresolved references in uncovered scope, lower confidence, and do not re-infer them. Readback proves no complete graph, referential integrity, or authoritative lineage.
Check authorized transformations for omissions/unsupported additions; reuse sufficient evidence without exhaustive traces or another report.
Match claims to checked properties, objects and conditions. Resolve counterexamples or qualify results. At first material claim, attribute code, executed tests, runtime, documentation or inference and limits. Search misses prove no absence; code cannot override approved requirements. Parsing proves neither required fields nor semantics; success cannot dismiss warnings. Settings do not prove behavior; changed conditions limit causal comparisons. Check measurable requirements deterministically; claim only executed checks. Reuse review without extra calls/reports/criteria. Negative/qualified findings are not acceptance.
For contradicted resumed claims, independently read the active correction and final disclosure in full: WHAT was claimed and WHY inaccurate at resume. Current success supplies neither. Preserve subject, scope and time; related claims may share an explanation. Check example-only, negated, withdrawn or re-scoped text; matching quotes do not prove adoption. Keep accurate claims. Unresolved material disagreement means `needs-verification`, not forced reviewer agreement; resolved evidence supports normal verification. Omit this slot without a discrepancy.
Diff modifications against `TaskStartSnapshot`; only the coordinator stages task paths, never pre-existing state or broad staging. After fresh verification, create one local commit except read-only/no-change, authorized `no commit`, or failed verification. Read back `HEAD`, message, files and delta. Commit/hook failure preserves work and blocks clean claims; never bypass hooks.
Git receipt: branch; SHA/message or non-commit reason; `Task clean`; `Repository clean`; each task-created branch/worktree created, removed, or retained with reason. Task-clean never implies repo-clean; it is not external integration.
Classify commit scope: `business`, `process-only`, `mixed`, or `no-commit`. Failed-attempt telemetry is no commit reason. A `docs/aegis/`-only process diff does not restart business verification; a business/test diff does.
Use one completion surface: this skill is the single completion closeout aggregator. Adjacent skills/L2 cards must not replace it or become a competing final report owner. Aggregation is output conformance, not a routing trigger: no extra skills, Trace Digest or ceremony merely to fill it.
If entry visibility was omitted, recover and name the decision/evidence gap, not a used-skills list or `Aegis Contribution Note`.
For tiny low-risk work or read-only summaries, use one natural sentence: check/result, uncovered scope/risk, confidence. Require sufficient current evidence; attribute supplied evidence; invent no execution or extra report.
Fold evidence into `Evidence strength` and `Uncovered risk`.
`Aegis Impact and Safety Receipt` slots: `Key judgment`=owner/root cause/requirement/completion boundary; `Avoided misfix`=fallback/duplicate/test accommodation/scope growth; `Boundary held`=contract/owner/baseline/non-goal/data/runtime boundary; `Baseline alignment`=aligned/Design Defect/Implementation Drift/missing-authority/needs-clarification/not triggered; `Complexity control`=comple
Aegis Method Pack Make your AI coding agent trustworthy: fewer reworks, safer changes, proof before "done". English · 中文 · Fast-Track Playbook · 速通秘籍 Stop babysitting your agent.
Use when touching retiring old logic, collapsing duplicate owners, removing fallbacks, or schema/persistence/source-of-truth…
Use when defining ambiguous or high-complexity new features, product behavior, UI/component design, architecture choices,…
Use when the user asks for caveman mode, fewer tokens, brief responses, compressed communication, or otherwise explicitly…
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks without a written plan, with no conflicting shared mutable state or sequential dependencies,…
Use when the user asks to establish shared project language, or project work exposes a conflicting, renamed, or deprecated domain…
Use when executing a written implementation plan across sessions or with review checkpoints. Small or single-slice plans stay…
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.