/sweep
Sweep this conversation into agtx tasks and push them to the kanban board. Use when the user wants to capture, decompose, or hand off conversation results to the agtx board.
$ npx -y skills add fynnfluegge/agtx --skill sweep --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/sweep
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Sweep this conversation into agtx tasks and push them to the kanban board. Use when the user wants to capture, decompose, or hand off conversation results to the agtx board.
SKILL.md
sweep.SKILL.mdname: agtx-sweep
description: "Sweep this conversation into agtx tasks and push them to the kanban board. Use when the user wants to capture, decompose, or hand off conversation results to the agtx board."
disable-model-invocation: true
agtx — Terminal Kanban for Coding Agents
agtx is a kanban board that manages parallel coding agent sessions (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Copilot, OpenCode). Each task gets its own git worktree, branch, tmux window, and agent session — producing one reviewable PR per task.
**You are an orchestrator.** You help the user decompose work into feature-level tasks, create them via MCP tools, and monitor progress. The user can enter any task's agent session via tmux to course-correct.
How It Works
You (orchestrator session, project root)
├── create_tasks_batch → Task A (worktree, branch, agent session) → PR
├── create_tasks_batch → Task B (worktree, branch, agent session) → PR
└── create_tasks_batch → Task C (depends on A) → blocked until A in Review
**Tasks are like subagents, but with superpowers:**
- Each runs in its own worktree with full git isolation
- Each has a visible tmux session the user can enter anytime
- Each persists across TUI restarts (tmux survives)
- Each produces a reviewable, mergeable PR
- Each can be a different agent (Claude, Codex, Gemini, etc.)
The task agent handles its own internal planning — it can use `/plan`, spawn subagents, or use any workflow. You don't micromanage implementation details.
Task Lifecycle
Backlog → Planning → Running → Review → Done
| Phase | What happens | |-------|-------------| | **Backlog** | Created by you via MCP. Sits on the board until user is ready. | | **Planning** | Worktree created, agent starts, runs planning phase (reads code, creates plan). | | **Running** | Agent implements the feature. May use subagents internally. | | **Review** | PR created. User reviews. Can resume to address feedback. | | **Done** | Merged. Worktree cleaned up, branch kept. |
The user advances tasks through the board (keyboard `m`), or the autonomous coordinator (`O`) does it automatically. You create and organize tasks — the board handles execution.
Decomposition Strategy
When asked to plan or break down work:
1. **Think in PRs** — each task = one reviewable, independently mergeable PR 2. **Use dependencies** — if task B needs task A's code, wire it via `depends_on` 3. **Keep tasks atomic** — "Add OAuth + rate limiting + caching" = 3 tasks, not 1 4. **Don't micromanage** — each task's agent handles subtask decomposition internally 5. **Group only if must ship together** — otherwise, separate PRs
**Ask strategic questions** ("should auth come before the DB migration?"), not tactical ones ("should we use a factory pattern?"). The task agent handles tactical decisions.
What Makes a Good Task
**Title**: short imperative phrase, ≤ 8 words > "Add streaming CSV export endpoint"
**Description**: 2–5 sentences — what to build, why, key constraints, approach hints from the conversation. Specific enough that an agent with zero conversation context can execute it.
**Plugin**: `agtx` (default) for most tasks. `gsd` for structured spec-driven work. `void` for plain sessions with no prompting.
MCP Tools
You have access to these tools via the agtx MCP server. Tool parameters are self-documented — call any tool to see its schema.
| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | `list_tasks` | List all tasks, optionally filter by status | | `get_task` | Get task details + `allowed_actions` | | `create_task` | Create a single backlog task | | `create_tasks_batch` | Batch create with index-based dependencies | | `update_task` | Modify backlog task (title, description, deps) | | `delete_task` | Delete backlog task | | `move_task` | Advance task (move_forward, escalate_to_user) | | `read_pane_content` | Read agent's tmux output (last N lines) | | `send_to_task` | Send message to agent's tmux pane | | `check_conflicts` | Check merge conflicts for Review tasks |
Batch Creation Example
create_tasks_batch({
"tasks": [
{ "title": "Add users table migration", "description": "Create users table with email, password_hash, created_at" },
{ "title": "Add user API endpoints", "description": "CRUD endpoints for /api/users", "depends_on": [0] },
{ "title": "Add auth middleware", "description": "JWT-based auth middleware", "depends_on": [0] },
{ "title": "Add integration tests", "description": "Test auth flow end-to-end", "depends_on": [1, 2] }
]
})Tasks 1 and 2 run in parallel (both depend on 0). Task 3 waits for both.
Sweep — Push Conversation to Board
When the user asks to sweep, push, or hand off the conversation to the board:
1. Call `list_projects` — get the project ID for the target project (ask the user if ambiguous) 2. Call `list_tasks` with `project_id` — check for duplicates 3. Extract every actionable work item from the conversation 4. **Stop and present the proposed task list to the user. Do NOT call any MCP write tools yet.** Show each task with a checkmark, title, description, and dependencies:
✓ [0] Add streaming CSV export endpoint
Implement GET /export/csv with streaming response
depends on: none
✓ [1] Add date range filter to export
Query params ?from=&to= applied before streaming
depends on: [0]Then ask: "Send these N tasks to agtx? (yes / edit / cancel)" 5. **Handle the response:**
- `yes` → proceed with all tasks
- `edit` → ask which task to modify and what to change, update it in the list, re-show the full list, ask to confirm again
- `cancel` → stop, do nothing
6. **Only after final confirmation:** use `create_tasks_batch` (with `project_id`) for multiple tasks, `create_task` for one 7. Report created IDs:
✓ a1b2c3 Add streaming CSV export endpoint
✓ d4e5f6 Add date range filter to export
Setup Verification
Before creating tasks, verify the M
Read more
name: agtx-sweep description: "Sweep this conversation into agtx tasks and push them to the kanban board. Use when the user wants to capture, decompose, or hand off conversation results to the agtx board." disable-model-invocation: true
agtx — Terminal Kanban for Coding Agents
agtx is a kanban board that manages parallel coding agent sessions (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Copilot, OpenCode). Each task gets its own git worktree, branch, tmux window, and agent session — producing one reviewable PR per task.
**You are an orchestrator.** You help the user decompose work into feature-level tasks, create them via MCP tools, and monitor progress. The user can enter any task's agent session via tmux to course-correct.
How It Works
You (orchestrator session, project root) ├── create_tasks_batch → Task A (worktree, branch, agent session) → PR ├── create_tasks_batch → Task B (worktree, branch, agent session) → PR └── create_tasks_batch → Task C (depends on A) → blocked until A in Review
**Tasks are like subagents, but with superpowers:**
- Each runs in its own worktree with full git isolation
- Each has a visible tmux session the user can enter anytime
- Each persists across TUI restarts (tmux survives)
- Each produces a reviewable, mergeable PR
- Each can be a different agent (Claude, Codex, Gemini, etc.)
The task agent handles its own internal planning — it can use `/plan`, spawn subagents, or use any workflow. You don't micromanage implementation details.
Task Lifecycle
Backlog → Planning → Running → Review → Done
| Phase | What happens | |-------|-------------| | **Backlog** | Created by you via MCP. Sits on the board until user is ready. | | **Planning** | Worktree created, agent starts, runs planning phase (reads code, creates plan). | | **Running** | Agent implements the feature. May use subagents internally. | | **Review** | PR created. User reviews. Can resume to address feedback. | | **Done** | Merged. Worktree cleaned up, branch kept. |
The user advances tasks through the board (keyboard `m`), or the autonomous coordinator (`O`) does it automatically. You create and organize tasks — the board handles execution.
Decomposition Strategy
When asked to plan or break down work:
1. **Think in PRs** — each task = one reviewable, independently mergeable PR 2. **Use dependencies** — if task B needs task A's code, wire it via `depends_on` 3. **Keep tasks atomic** — "Add OAuth + rate limiting + caching" = 3 tasks, not 1 4. **Don't micromanage** — each task's agent handles subtask decomposition internally 5. **Group only if must ship together** — otherwise, separate PRs
**Ask strategic questions** ("should auth come before the DB migration?"), not tactical ones ("should we use a factory pattern?"). The task agent handles tactical decisions.
What Makes a Good Task
**Title**: short imperative phrase, ≤ 8 words > "Add streaming CSV export endpoint"
**Description**: 2–5 sentences — what to build, why, key constraints, approach hints from the conversation. Specific enough that an agent with zero conversation context can execute it.
**Plugin**: `agtx` (default) for most tasks. `gsd` for structured spec-driven work. `void` for plain sessions with no prompting.
MCP Tools
You have access to these tools via the agtx MCP server. Tool parameters are self-documented — call any tool to see its schema.
| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | `list_tasks` | List all tasks, optionally filter by status | | `get_task` | Get task details + `allowed_actions` | | `create_task` | Create a single backlog task | | `create_tasks_batch` | Batch create with index-based dependencies | | `update_task` | Modify backlog task (title, description, deps) | | `delete_task` | Delete backlog task | | `move_task` | Advance task (move_forward, escalate_to_user) | | `read_pane_content` | Read agent's tmux output (last N lines) | | `send_to_task` | Send message to agent's tmux pane | | `check_conflicts` | Check merge conflicts for Review tasks |
Batch Creation Example
create_tasks_batch({
"tasks": [
{ "title": "Add users table migration", "description": "Create users table with email, password_hash, created_at" },
{ "title": "Add user API endpoints", "description": "CRUD endpoints for /api/users", "depends_on": [0] },
{ "title": "Add auth middleware", "description": "JWT-based auth middleware", "depends_on": [0] },
{ "title": "Add integration tests", "description": "Test auth flow end-to-end", "depends_on": [1, 2] }
]
})Tasks 1 and 2 run in parallel (both depend on 0). Task 3 waits for both.
Sweep — Push Conversation to Board
When the user asks to sweep, push, or hand off the conversation to the board:
1. Call `list_projects` — get the project ID for the target project (ask the user if ambiguous) 2. Call `list_tasks` with `project_id` — check for duplicates 3. Extract every actionable work item from the conversation 4. **Stop and present the proposed task list to the user. Do NOT call any MCP write tools yet.** Show each task with a checkmark, title, description, and dependencies:
✓ [0] Add streaming CSV export endpoint
Implement GET /export/csv with streaming response
depends on: none
✓ [1] Add date range filter to export
Query params ?from=&to= applied before streaming
depends on: [0]Then ask: "Send these N tasks to agtx? (yes / edit / cancel)" 5. **Handle the response:**
- `yes` → proceed with all tasks
- `edit` → ask which task to modify and what to change, update it in the list, re-show the full list, ask to confirm again
- `cancel` → stop, do nothing
6. **Only after final confirmation:** use `create_tasks_batch` (with `project_id`) for multiple tasks, `create_task` for one 7. Report created IDs:
✓ a1b2c3 Add streaming CSV export endpoint ✓ d4e5f6 Add date range filter to export
Setup Verification
Before creating tasks, verify the M
The blackboard for coding agents - Add tasks. Press one key. An orchestrator agent picks it up, plans, and delegates to multiple coding agents running in parallel. Come back to changes ready to merge.
Other skills on agtx.
- /benchmark
Run SWE-bench Lite benchmarks against agtx coding agent workflows. Guides setup, configuration, execution, evaluation, and reporting.
Open skill - /agtx-execute
Execute an approved implementation plan. Implement the changes, then write a summary to .agtx/execute.md and stop.
Open skill - /agtx-plan
Plan a task implementation. Analyze the codebase, create a detailed plan, write it to .agtx/plan.md, then stop and wait for user approval before making any changes.
Open skill - /agtx-research
Explore the codebase to understand a task before planning. Write findings to .agtx/research.md and stop. This is a read-only exploration — do not modify any files.
Open skill - /agtx-review
Self-review completed work. Check for correctness, edge cases, and code quality. Write review to .agtx/review.md and stop.
Open skill - /brainstorm
Enter brainstorm mode to explore a feature or enhancement idea. Stays in discussion mode only — no planning, no implementation. Use /agtx:sweep when ready to push outcomes to the board.
Open skill

