atdd-plan
Produce an ATDD-first implementation plan in Claude Code's native plan mode, with named design patterns called out where they…
Pre-planning ticket ingestion. Given a ticket ID or URL, reads the full ticket via MCP or CLI, follows all referenced links (Notion, Figma, GitHub, articles, etc.) using parallel subagents, synthesises a context brief, grounds it in the actual codebase via
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add Flagrare/agent-skills --skill intake --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add Flagrare/agent-skills --skill intake -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add Flagrare/agent-skills --skill intake -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add Flagrare/agent-skills --skill intake -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add Flagrare/agent-skills --skill intake -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add Flagrare/agent-skills --skill intake -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add Flagrare/agent-skills --skill intake -a windsurf -y
name: intake description: "Pre-planning ticket ingestion. Given a ticket ID or URL, reads the full ticket via MCP or CLI, follows all referenced links (Notion, Figma, GitHub, articles, etc.) using parallel subagents, synthesises a context brief, grounds it in the actual codebase via /flagrare:codebase-explore, then asks codebase-informed clarifying questions before handing off to /flagrare:atdd-plan. Works with Linear, Jira, Asana, Shortcut, Trello."
Turn a ticket reference into a planning-ready context brief before `/flagrare:atdd-plan` runs. The goal: **every relevant fact is on the table and every ambiguity is resolved before a single line of implementation is planned**.
---
**Hard requirement.** Before any other tool call, you (the executing model) MUST call `/goal` yourself, unless you were invoked through `/flagrare:work-prep` (see the skip rule below). This is not a suggestion to the user.
**Why:** intake's most common failure is stopping after it emits the context brief and never reaching the clarifying questions. Emitting a large artifact reads as "turn complete," and the only forcing function downstream (the `AskUserQuestion` call in Step 5) sits two steps past that natural stop. A `/goal` is a session-scoped Stop-hook: after every turn a fast evaluator checks your condition against the conversation and, if unmet, makes you continue instead of yielding. Set it *before* the brief exists, so it is already holding you in place when you emit it. (Grounded in [`docs/research/2026-06-11-claude-code-goal-anti-stall.md`](../../../../docs/research/2026-06-11-claude-code-goal-anti-stall.md).)
Call `/goal` with a condition phrased as something your own output demonstrates, the evaluator cannot run tools or read files, it only judges what you have surfaced in the conversation:
> The ticket and every referenced link have been read; a codebase-grounded context brief has been produced (with `## Codebase Findings` populated); the 3-5 most blocking clarifying questions have been asked via the `AskUserQuestion` tool and answered (or the brief had no blocking ambiguity and a short overview was presented instead); and either `/flagrare:atdd-plan` has been invoked with the brief as input, or the user has explicitly chosen "Stop here". Stop after 12 turns if not met.
After setting the goal, create a Todo list (TodoWrite), one item per remaining step (read ticket, follow references, synthesise brief, ground in codebase, ask questions, hand off). The todo list tracks coverage; the goal prevents the harness from letting you stop. Both are required.
**Skip rule (nested under work-prep):** if the args passed to this skill start with `[work-prep]`, do NOT call `/goal`, `/flagrare:work-prep` already set a session-spanning goal, and only one goal can be active per session (a second would silently replace the first). Still create the Todo list.
**If `/goal` is unavailable** (it reports the workspace is untrusted, or `disableAllHooks` / `allowManagedHooksOnly` is set): proceed without it, but treat the no-yield notes in Steps 4-5 as mandatory rather than belt-and-suspenders.
---
Before anything else, check what tools and MCPs are available in this session. List every MCP whose name contains any of: `linear`, `jira`, `asana`, `shortcut`, `trello`, `notion`, `figma`, `drive`, `github`, `gitlab`, `confluence`, `browser`, `playwright`, `puppeteer`, `fetch`, `web`, `obsidian`.
Build a capability map:
available MCPs: [list every matched tool] available CLIs: run `which linear jira shortcut gh glab notion 2>/dev/null`, note which exist browser tools: [any MCP or tool that can load a URL with JS/auth, playwright, puppeteer, browser MCP] file system: [local Obsidian vault paths if known]
Use this map to pick the best tool for every fetch in Steps 2-3. A browser/automation MCP beats WebFetch for pages behind login. A first-party MCP beats a browser tool. An authenticated CLI beats an unauthenticated API call.
---
Accept any of:
Identify the platform:
| Signal | Platform | |---|---| | `linear.app` URL or `[A-Z]{2,}-[0-9]+` | Linear | | `atlassian.net/jira` URL | Jira | | `app.asana.com` URL | Asana | | `app.shortcut.com` URL or `ch[0-9]+` | Shortcut | | `trello.com` URL | Trello |
If the platform is ambiguous, ask before proceeding.
---
**When to call directly vs. spawn a subagent:** If the platform MCP is available in your session (e.g. you can call `mcp__jira__getIssue` yourself), call it directly -- there is no benefit to adding a subagent layer for a single tool call you already have access to. The subagent path exists for two cases: (1) the ticket has a large comment history that would bloat your context, or (2) the MCP is unavailable and the agent needs to walk a fallback chain (CLI, then WebFetch). Use judgement: small ticket + MCP available = call directly; large ticket or no MCP = subagent.
Call the platform MCP tool directly. Extract: title, description, acceptance criteria, labels/tags, priority, assignee, linked issues, attached files, and every URL mentioned in the body or comments. Keep the raw structured output for Steps 3-4.
Spawn a **Ticket Reader** subagent with `model: "sonnet"` and this brief:
> Read the full ticket [ID/URL] and return: title, description, acceptance criteria, labels/tags, priority, assignee, linked issues, attached files, and every URL mentioned in the body or comments. > > Use the best available tool in this order: > 1. MCP tool for the platfo
Thirty-eight skills that wrap around your development cycle in Claude Code. They turn tickets into ATDD plans, smoke-test features against a running app or service, hunt down bugs with runtime evidence, guard commits against doc drift, run seven-axis code
Produce an ATDD-first implementation plan in Claude Code's native plan mode, with named design patterns called out where they…
Generate a comprehensive, impact-framed brag-doc entry for a chosen time window (day, week, biweek, month, or custom). Pulls…
Programmatic bug bashing, ingest a prescribed test plan (Notion, markdown, pasted spec), drive a real running system (browser via…
Run the career skills that are due, in one pass, and return one short combined digest plus an updated board. It reads timestamps…
Explore the codebase to map conventions, reusable utilities, analogous features, and data flows relevant to a planned change.…
Generate a daily code review report showing stale PRs, items needing your attention, and active work for your team. Use whenever…
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or…
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.