/ijfw-spec-phase
Use when the user says 'spec this', 'scope this slice', 'lock requirements', 'what are we building', or before any planning / execution call where requirements are ambiguous. Produces a falsifiable SPEC.md that locks WHAT before HOW.
$ npx -y skills add FerroxLabs/ijfw --skill ijfw-spec-phase --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/ijfw-spec-phase
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use when the user says 'spec this', 'scope this slice', 'lock requirements', 'what are we building', or before any planning / execution call where requirements are ambiguous. Produces a falsifiable SPEC.md that locks WHAT before HOW.
SKILL.md
ijfw-spec-phase.SKILL.mdname: ijfw-spec-phase
description: "Use when the user says 'spec this', 'scope this slice', 'lock requirements', 'what are we building', or before any planning / execution call where requirements are ambiguous. Produces a falsifiable SPEC.md that locks WHAT before HOW."
since: '1.5.0'
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Bash, Grep, Glob, AskUserQuestion, Agent
IJFW Spec-Phase -- lock WHAT before HOW
You are the orchestrator-facing trigger that produces `.planning/<milestone>/<phase>/SPEC.md` for the active phase. SPEC.md captures falsifiable acceptance criteria, explicit in-scope / out-of-scope boundaries, and dependencies -- BEFORE plan-phase touches HOW to implement.
Domain-agnostic. Same flow for: software slice ("user auth"), book chapter ("Ch4 scope, POV lock, must-cover beats"), campaign slice ("launch week 1 channel mix"), research milestone ("literature review boundaries").
When to fire
1. User explicitly asks: "spec this", "scope this", "lock requirements". 2. plan-phase / execute-phase is requested but no SPEC.md exists for the active slice under `.planning/<milestone>/<phase>/`. 3. ijfw-workflow Deep path enters the Plan gate with unclear requirements.
Process
1. Locate the active phase
MILESTONE=$(cat .ijfw/state/active-milestone 2>/dev/null \
|| ls -1 .planning/ | grep -E '^[0-9]' | tail -1)
PHASE=$(cat .ijfw/state/active-phase 2>/dev/null || echo "$1")
PHASE_DIR=".planning/${MILESTONE}/${PHASE}"
mkdir -p "$PHASE_DIR"If `$PHASE` is unset and not supplied as argument, ASK the user which phase to spec. Never guess.
2. Load context
Read in order, skipping any that don't exist:
1. `.ijfw/memory/brief.md` -- the original ask 2. `.planning/ROADMAP.md` -- where this phase sits 3. `.planning/<milestone>/ROADMAP.md` -- milestone-scoped roadmap 4. Any prior `SPEC.md` / `CONTEXT.md` from earlier phases in this milestone 5. `.planning/PROJECT.md` -- non-negotiables
Extract: phase goal, declared boundaries, prior decisions that flow forward.
3. Identify ambiguities (gray areas)
For the phase, list:
- **What's clear** -- requirements with one obvious interpretation.
- **What's gray** -- decisions that could go multiple ways and would
change the result. Each gray area is a single sentence.
- **What's decided** -- already locked in a prior phase's CONTEXT.md or SPEC.md.
If gray-area count is zero: skip Step 4 and write SPEC.md directly using captured-as-clear requirements.
4. Dispatch ijfw-discuss-phase (if gray areas exist)
Task: ijfw-discuss-phase
Args:
milestone: $MILESTONE
phase: $PHASE
gray_areas: [list of one-line ambiguities]
prior_decisions_path: .planning/<milestone>/*/CONTEXT.md
The agent will interrogate the user adaptively (AMBIGUITY SCORING -- top 3-5 gray areas by impact x uncertainty), capture decisions to `$PHASE_DIR/CONTEXT.md`, and return when the user is satisfied OR escalates.
Wait for the agent. Do NOT proceed to SPEC.md until CONTEXT.md exists.
5. Write SPEC.md
After CONTEXT.md is locked (or skipped if no gray areas), write to `$PHASE_DIR/SPEC.md` with these sections:
# SPEC -- <milestone> / <phase>
**Locked:** <ISO date> **Status:** Ready for plan-phase
## Goal
<One-sentence outcome -- what the user can do / see / read / receive
when this slice is shipped.>
## Acceptance Criteria
Each MUST be falsifiable (binary pass/fail; no "should" / "nice").
1. <Criterion>
2. <Criterion>
## In Scope
- <Capability / artifact / chapter section>
## Out of Scope (Deferred)
- <Mentioned but pushed to a later slice>
## Dependencies
- **Inputs:** <Required from prior slices / external>
- **Outputs:** <Handed to the next slice>
- **External:** <APIs, libraries, vendors, sources>
## Domain Notes
<Software: data shapes, contracts. Book: POV, tone, chapter beats.
Campaign: audience, channel mix, KPI target.>
## Canonical References
- CONTEXT.md (this slice's decisions)
- <Any ADRs / specs / prior SPEC.md cited>
6. Commit + report
git add "$PHASE_DIR/SPEC.md"
git commit -m "spec($PHASE): lock requirements before plan-phase"
Report to orchestrator:
SPEC.md ready: <path>
Acceptance criteria: <N>
Gray areas resolved: <M>
Deferred items: <K>
Next: /ijfw-plan-phase $PHASE
Anti-patterns (do not do)
- Do NOT write SPEC.md without resolving gray areas first (defeats the point).
- Do NOT include implementation details (those belong in plan-phase output).
- Do NOT silently re-decide things already locked in prior CONTEXT.md files.
- Do NOT exceed phase boundary from ROADMAP.md -- scope creep gets deferred,
not absorbed.
Success criteria
- SPEC.md exists at `.planning/<milestone>/<phase>/SPEC.md`.
- Every acceptance criterion is binary-falsifiable.
- In-scope / out-of-scope are explicit (no ambiguity at boundary).
- Dependencies cite concrete inputs and outputs.
- CONTEXT.md exists alongside if any gray areas were interrogated.
- Commit landed; orchestrator can hand off to plan-phase.
Read more
name: ijfw-spec-phase description: "Use when the user says 'spec this', 'scope this slice', 'lock requirements', 'what are we building', or before any planning / execution call where requirements are ambiguous. Produces a falsifiable SPEC.md that locks WHAT before HOW." since: '1.5.0' allowed-tools: Read, Write, Bash, Grep, Glob, AskUserQuestion, Agent
IJFW Spec-Phase -- lock WHAT before HOW
You are the orchestrator-facing trigger that produces `.planning/<milestone>/<phase>/SPEC.md` for the active phase. SPEC.md captures falsifiable acceptance criteria, explicit in-scope / out-of-scope boundaries, and dependencies -- BEFORE plan-phase touches HOW to implement.
Domain-agnostic. Same flow for: software slice ("user auth"), book chapter ("Ch4 scope, POV lock, must-cover beats"), campaign slice ("launch week 1 channel mix"), research milestone ("literature review boundaries").
When to fire
1. User explicitly asks: "spec this", "scope this", "lock requirements". 2. plan-phase / execute-phase is requested but no SPEC.md exists for the active slice under `.planning/<milestone>/<phase>/`. 3. ijfw-workflow Deep path enters the Plan gate with unclear requirements.
Process
1. Locate the active phase
MILESTONE=$(cat .ijfw/state/active-milestone 2>/dev/null \
|| ls -1 .planning/ | grep -E '^[0-9]' | tail -1)
PHASE=$(cat .ijfw/state/active-phase 2>/dev/null || echo "$1")
PHASE_DIR=".planning/${MILESTONE}/${PHASE}"
mkdir -p "$PHASE_DIR"If `$PHASE` is unset and not supplied as argument, ASK the user which phase to spec. Never guess.
2. Load context
Read in order, skipping any that don't exist:
1. `.ijfw/memory/brief.md` -- the original ask 2. `.planning/ROADMAP.md` -- where this phase sits 3. `.planning/<milestone>/ROADMAP.md` -- milestone-scoped roadmap 4. Any prior `SPEC.md` / `CONTEXT.md` from earlier phases in this milestone 5. `.planning/PROJECT.md` -- non-negotiables
Extract: phase goal, declared boundaries, prior decisions that flow forward.
3. Identify ambiguities (gray areas)
For the phase, list:
- **What's clear** -- requirements with one obvious interpretation.
- **What's gray** -- decisions that could go multiple ways and would
change the result. Each gray area is a single sentence.
- **What's decided** -- already locked in a prior phase's CONTEXT.md or SPEC.md.
If gray-area count is zero: skip Step 4 and write SPEC.md directly using captured-as-clear requirements.
4. Dispatch ijfw-discuss-phase (if gray areas exist)
Task: ijfw-discuss-phase Args: milestone: $MILESTONE phase: $PHASE gray_areas: [list of one-line ambiguities] prior_decisions_path: .planning/<milestone>/*/CONTEXT.md
The agent will interrogate the user adaptively (AMBIGUITY SCORING -- top 3-5 gray areas by impact x uncertainty), capture decisions to `$PHASE_DIR/CONTEXT.md`, and return when the user is satisfied OR escalates.
Wait for the agent. Do NOT proceed to SPEC.md until CONTEXT.md exists.
5. Write SPEC.md
After CONTEXT.md is locked (or skipped if no gray areas), write to `$PHASE_DIR/SPEC.md` with these sections:
# SPEC -- <milestone> / <phase> **Locked:** <ISO date> **Status:** Ready for plan-phase ## Goal <One-sentence outcome -- what the user can do / see / read / receive when this slice is shipped.> ## Acceptance Criteria Each MUST be falsifiable (binary pass/fail; no "should" / "nice"). 1. <Criterion> 2. <Criterion> ## In Scope - <Capability / artifact / chapter section> ## Out of Scope (Deferred) - <Mentioned but pushed to a later slice> ## Dependencies - **Inputs:** <Required from prior slices / external> - **Outputs:** <Handed to the next slice> - **External:** <APIs, libraries, vendors, sources> ## Domain Notes <Software: data shapes, contracts. Book: POV, tone, chapter beats. Campaign: audience, channel mix, KPI target.> ## Canonical References - CONTEXT.md (this slice's decisions) - <Any ADRs / specs / prior SPEC.md cited>
6. Commit + report
git add "$PHASE_DIR/SPEC.md" git commit -m "spec($PHASE): lock requirements before plan-phase"
Report to orchestrator:
SPEC.md ready: <path> Acceptance criteria: <N> Gray areas resolved: <M> Deferred items: <K> Next: /ijfw-plan-phase $PHASE
Anti-patterns (do not do)
- Do NOT write SPEC.md without resolving gray areas first (defeats the point).
- Do NOT include implementation details (those belong in plan-phase output).
- Do NOT silently re-decide things already locked in prior CONTEXT.md files.
- Do NOT exceed phase boundary from ROADMAP.md -- scope creep gets deferred,
not absorbed.
Success criteria
- SPEC.md exists at `.planning/<milestone>/<phase>/SPEC.md`.
- Every acceptance criterion is binary-falsifiable.
- In-scope / out-of-scope are explicit (no ambiguity at boundary).
- Dependencies cite concrete inputs and outputs.
- CONTEXT.md exists alongside if any gray areas were interrogated.
- Commit landed; orchestrator can hand off to plan-phase.
IJFW — It Just F*cking Works. Ferrox Labs' local-first infrastructure for AI coding agents: shared memory, smart routing, multi-AI cross-audits, disciplined workflow.
Repo: FerroxLabs/ijfw
Other skills on ijfw.
- /ijfw-agents-md
Maintain canonical AGENTS.md (open spec). Trigger: 'agents.md', 'update AGENTS.md', or auto-fired by ijfw-team after agent generation.
Open skill - /ijfw-auto-memorize
Session-end auto-extraction of lessons, errors, fixes, and user feedback into structured memory. Fires at session end. Requires consent on first run.
Open skill - /ijfw-commit
Terse conventional commits. Trigger: commit, git commit, /ijfw-commit
Open skill - /ijfw-complete-milestone
Use when a milestone is shipping and you need to archive its artifacts, generate a summary, and seed the next milestone. Trigger: 'milestone complete', 'ship milestone', 'wrap milestone', 'complete milestone <id>', /ijfw-complete-milestone.
Open skill - /ijfw-compress
Compress memory/context files into terse form. Trigger: /compress, compress file
Open skill - /ijfw-compute
Use when the user says: 'compute', 'crunch this', 'analyze logs', 'aggregate the data', 'run a script', 'dedupe', 'count by', 'top N', or any data-shaping ask. Replaces dumping raw data into context with sandboxed script execution.
Open skill

