ijfw-agents-md
Maintain canonical AGENTS.md (open spec). Trigger: 'agents.md', 'update AGENTS.md', or auto-fired by ijfw-team after agent generation.
Use when the user says: 'new milestone', 'next milestone', 'plan milestone', 'start milestone', 'begin v1.2', 'kick off next release', 'next chapter', 'next campaign wave', 'next design tier', /ijfw-new-milestone
$ npx -y skills add FerroxLabs/ijfw --skill ijfw-new-milestone --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/ijfw-new-milestoneContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use when the user says: 'new milestone', 'next milestone', 'plan milestone', 'start milestone', 'begin v1.2', 'kick off next release', 'next chapter', 'next campaign wave', 'next design tier', /ijfw-new-milestone
name: ijfw-new-milestone description: "Use when the user says: 'new milestone', 'next milestone', 'plan milestone', 'start milestone', 'begin v1.2', 'kick off next release', 'next chapter', 'next campaign wave', 'next design tier', /ijfw-new-milestone" since: '1.5.0'
Kick off a new milestone cycle on an existing project. Brownfield equivalent of project bootstrap: project exists, prior milestones shipped, you need a scoped plan for the next iteration.
Domain-agnostic. Works for software releases (v1.2 → v1.3), book chapters (Ch 4 → Ch 5), campaign waves (Wave 2 → Wave 3), design-system tiers (Foundation → Components → Patterns).
Optional `$ARGUMENTS`: milestone name (e.g. `v1.6 Notifications`, `Chapter 5: Adversarial Models`). Ask inline if absent.
Read in order:
If `.planning/ROADMAP.md` is absent, dispatch `ijfw-roadmapper` agent to scaffold one from `PROJECT.md`, then resume here.
Parse the last milestone from `MILESTONES.md` or `ROADMAP.md`. Suggest the next per project convention:
Confirm before writing anything.
Ask one open question: `What do you want to ship in this milestone? (one sentence)`
Then probe by domain bucket (pick what fits, skip the rest):
Per activated bucket ask: `Table stakes vs differentiators?` Table stakes go in; differentiators debated.
If prior `LEARNINGS.md` exists, surface its top 3 "do differently" items and ask which to act on.
Present a summary block and ask for confirmation:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ IJFW ► MILESTONE SUMMARY ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Milestone: <identifier> — <name> Goal: <one sentence> In scope: - <bucket>: <item 1>, <item 2> - <bucket>: <item 3> Out of scope (explicit): - <thing user declined> Learnings applied: - <from prior LEARNINGS.md> Success criteria (top-level): 1. <observable outcome> 2. <observable outcome> 3. <observable outcome>
Ask: "Does this capture it? (looks good / adjust)". Loop until confirmed.
Atomically create/update:
HANDOFF.md skeleton:
# Handoff — <Milestone Identifier> Updated: <ISO date> Goal: <one sentence> ## Inputs - Prior milestone: <id> (LEARNINGS: <path or "n/a">) - Carried forward: <pending blockers from prior STATE.md> ## Scope (in) - <bucket>: <item>, <item> - <bucket>: <item> ## Out of scope (explicit) - <item> — <reason> ## Success criteria 1. <observable> 2. <observable> 3. <observable> ## Plan items (filled by ijfw-spec-phase + ijfw-discuss-phase per item) - [ ] <item-id>: <title> — status: pending - [ ] <item-id>: <title> — status: pending ## Resume protocol Next session: read this file, run `/ijfw-execute <item-id>` for the first pending item. Each item completes atomically with its own commit.
For each scope item that is non-trivial, route through:
1. `ijfw-spec-phase` skill — clarify WHAT the item delivers (success-vs-ambiguity check). Writes per-item `SPEC.md`. 2. `ijfw-discuss-phase` agent — gather context on HOW (constraints, approach, edge cases). Updates the SPEC and/or writes per-item `DISCUSS.md`.
Trivial items (one-line task, low ambiguity, no cross-cutting risk) skip both and go straight into HANDOFF.md as plan items.
Do not plan execution here. That belongs to `ijfw-plan` for each item once spec + discuss land.
Two commits, atomic per concern:
git add .planning/PROJECT.md .planning/STATE.md git commit -m "docs(<milestone>): start milestone — goal + scope" git add .planning/<milestone>/HANDOFF.md .planning/ROADMAP.md git commit -m "docs(<milestone>): handoff skeleton + roadmap entry"
If any `SPEC.md` / `DISCUSS.md` files landed in step 6, commit those per-item with their own atomic commits (the dispatched skill/agent handles its own commit).
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ IJFW ► MILESTONE <id> INITIALIZED ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Milestone: <id> — <name> Items: <N> planned (<M> spec'd, <K> discussed) Artifacts: - .planning/<milestone>/HANDOFF.md - .planning/PROJECT.md (updated) - .planning/ROADMAP.md (updated) - .planning/STATE.md (reset) Next: `/ijfw-plan <first-item-id>` to plan exec
IJFW — It Just F*cking Works. Ferrox Labs' local-first infrastructure for AI coding agents: shared memory, smart routing, multi-AI cross-audits, disciplined workflow.
Repo: FerroxLabs/ijfw
Maintain canonical AGENTS.md (open spec). Trigger: 'agents.md', 'update AGENTS.md', or auto-fired by ijfw-team after agent generation.
Session-end auto-extraction of lessons, errors, fixes, and user feedback into structured memory. Fires at session end. Requires consent on first run.
Terse conventional commits. Trigger: commit, git commit, /ijfw-commit
Use when a milestone is shipping and you need to archive its artifacts, generate a summary, and seed the next milestone. Trigger: 'milestone complete', 'ship…
Compress memory/context files into terse form. Trigger: /compress, compress file
Use when the user says: 'compute', 'crunch this', 'analyze logs', 'aggregate the data', 'run a script', 'dedupe', 'count by', 'top N', or any data-shaping ask.…