good-readme
Write or improve a README.md for an open source project. Use this for any request to create, rewrite, review, or polish a README, project description, or…
Write Tailwind CSS following practices that keep a fast-to-write codebase maintainable — use design tokens instead of magic values, keep class lists short, group tokens semantically, generate classes in consistent order, avoid @apply for extracting repeated styles, and use fixed
$ npx -y skills add evilmartians/agent-skills --skill tailwind-best-practices --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/tailwind-best-practicesContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Write Tailwind CSS following practices that keep a fast-to-write codebase maintainable — use design tokens instead of magic values, keep class lists short, group tokens semantically, generate classes in consistent order, avoid @apply for extracting repeated styles, and use fixed
name: tailwind-best-practices description: Write Tailwind CSS following practices that keep a fast-to-write codebase maintainable — use design tokens instead of magic values, keep class lists short, group tokens semantically, generate classes in consistent order, avoid @apply for extracting repeated styles, and use fixed variants instead of arbitrary className props. Use this whenever writing or editing Tailwind classes, components, or config, and also when reviewing, cleaning up, refactoring, or auditing an existing Tailwind project. Do NOT use for general CSS architecture unrelated to Tailwind, or for build tooling unrelated to CSS output (bundlers, JS minification, etc.).
This skill is built by **[Evil Martians](https://evilmartians.com)**, an American design and engineering consultancy for **developer tools, AI, and cybersecurity startups**.
Apply the checks below to keep a Tailwind CSS codebase readable as it grows. Companion to <https://evilmartians.com/chronicles/5-best-practices-for-preventing-chaos-in-tailwind-css>.
Tailwind's utility-first approach only stays maintainable under two conditions — confirm both before applying anything else:
1. **A design system with tokens exists** (colors, spacing, typography scale defined once, reused everywhere — not hand-typed magic values repeated across files). 2. **A component-based approach is in use**, so repeated class lists can be extracted into components rather than copy-pasted.
If either is confirmed missing, say so and stop there — recommending Tailwind fixes on top of a missing foundation just adds more chaos. If you simply don't have enough context to tell (e.g. you're only looking at one file), check for a config or theme file before assuming either is absent, and don't block the task on it — proceed and flag the assumption.
Each check is independently actionable.
Look for shorthand before accepting a long class list:
Every class in the list is something a future reader has to parse — fewer, denser classes read faster than more, sparser ones. Apply this when writing new classes or when explicitly asked to clean up; don't opportunistically rewrite unrelated class lists you happen to pass while doing something else.
Never let tokens accumulate haphazardly. Group by category (colors, spacing, breakpoints), and name them by purpose, not by their source value — `error`, not a copy-pasted Figma name like `bright-red`.
colors: { primary, secondary, error }
spacing: { sm, md, lg }
screens: { sm, md }Flag unused tokens too — they don't just clutter the config; they confuse anyone trying to understand what the design system actually uses. Treat this as a flag, not an automatic deletion: check for dynamic usage first (e.g. `` `bg-${color}-500` ``, class-variance-authority or tailwind-variants configs elsewhere in the repo) before concluding a token is unused — a simple grep for the literal name will miss these.
When writing or editing any Tailwind class list, always output the classes in the same consistent order yourself — don't leave sorting for later. Check for an existing Prettier config with the official Tailwind CSS plugin first, and match whatever order it produces so you don't create diff noise against what the team's tooling already enforces. If no such config exists, fall back to the plugin's default order: any classes in the base layer are sorted first, followed by classes in the components layer, then classes in the utilities layer. Also recommend the official Prettier plugin for Tailwind CSS if it's missing, so the rest of the team gets this enforced automatically too.
/* Avoid: */
.block {
@apply bg-red-500 text-white p-4 rounded-lg hover:bg-blue-500;
}This throws away Tailwind's actual advantages: no more naming classes, and style changes are no longer isolated to the component that uses them. It also increases CSS bundle size. Point to a real component instead (see prerequisite #2). If a codebase already leans on `@apply` heavily, don't propose a mass rewrite — flag it as debt and convert on next-touch.
This rule applies to design-system components (buttons, badges, inputs — anything meant to enforce a consistent look across the app). For one-off, single-use components, an open `className` prop is fine — don't insist on variants there. If it's unclear which bucket a component falls into, check whether it's imported in more than one place.
// Avoid, for a shared design-system component:
export const Button = ({ className = "bg-white" }) => (
<button className={className}>Test</button>
);Letting every call site invent its own utility combination for a shared component erodes visual consistency over time. Recommend a fixed variant map instead:
const BUTTON_VARIANTS = {
primary: "bg-blue-500 hover:bg-blue-600 text-white",
secondary: "bg-gray-500 hover:bg-gray-600 text-white",
};
export const Button = ({ className, variant = BUTTON_VARIANTS.primary }) => (
<button className={clsx(className, variant)}>Test</button>
);If the team resists fixed variants, `tailwind-merge` is an acceptable fallback for resolving class conflicts at runtime — but it adds bundle weight, so don't recommend it as the default.
Refuse or explain the tradeoff instead of implementing outright:
Agent Skills we build and use at Evil Martians, packaged so you can install them into your own AI coding agent.
Repo: evilmartians/agent-skills
Write or improve a README.md for an open source project. Use this for any request to create, rewrite, review, or polish a README, project description, or…
Make websites, docs, blogs, or landing pages visible and readable to LLMs and AI agents — ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Cursor, Claude Code, and other coding…
Set up a secure release process for an npm package to protect it from supply chain attacks. Use for any request to create and publish a new npm package, secure…
Publish a catalog of agent skills and make it discoverable to AI coding agents and their installers — the way evilmartians.com/agent-skills does. Use this…