brainstorming-extensio…
Enforces design review gate after brainstorming — bridges superpowers:brainstorming into the metaswarm quality pipeline
Use when starting work on any task, when the user mentions metaswarm, or when the user wants to begin tracked development work
$ npx -y skills add dsifry/metaswarm --skill start --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/startContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use when starting work on any task, when the user mentions metaswarm, or when the user wants to begin tracked development work
name: start description: Use when starting work on any task, when the user mentions metaswarm, or when the user wants to begin tracked development work auto_activate: true triggers: - "work on issue" - "start issue" - "start task" - "use metaswarm" - "@metaswarm" - "agent-ready label"
This skill coordinates a swarm of specialized AI agents to autonomously handle GitHub Issues from creation to merged PR.
---
# User triggers via any of: @beads start #123 bd start 123 /beads-start 123
bd ready # Show tasks ready to work bd list # Show all tasks bd stats # Show project statistics bd doctor # Check system health
---
| Agent | Role | Spawned When | | ------------------------- | ------------------------------ | ---------------------------------- | | **Issue Orchestrator** | Main coordinator per Issue | Issue receives `agent-ready` label | | **Researcher Agent** | Codebase exploration | Orchestrator creates research task | | **Architect Agent** | Implementation planning | Research complete | | **Product Manager Agent** | Use case & user benefit review | Design review gate (parallel) | | **Designer Agent** | UX/API design review | Design review gate (parallel) | | **Security Design Agent** | Security threat modeling | Design review gate (parallel) | | **CTO Agent** | TDD readiness & plan review | Design review gate (parallel) | | **Coder Agent** | TDD implementation | Design review gate approved | | **Code Review Agent** | Internal code review | Implementation complete | | **Security Auditor** | Security review (code) | Implementation complete | | **Release Engineer Agent** | Safe delivery from merge through production | QA approves PR, PR reaches merge readiness | | **PR Shepherd** | PR lifecycle management | PR created |
See `./agents/` directory for detailed agent definitions.
---
For complex features created via brainstorming, an automatic **Design Review Gate** ensures quality before implementation:
Design Document Created
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ DESIGN REVIEW GATE │
│ │
│ Spawns in PARALLEL: │
│ • Architect Agent (technical architecture) │
│ • Designer Agent (UX/API design) │
│ • UX Reviewer (user flows, integration WUs) │
│ • CTO Agent (TDD readiness) │
│ │
│ ALL must approve to proceed │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
├── Any NEEDS_REVISION? → Iterate on design (max 3x)
│
ALL APPROVED
│
▼
Create BEADS Epic → Begin ImplementationThe gate is automatically triggered when:
| Agent | Focus Areas | | --------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | | Product Manager | Use case clarity, user benefits, scope, success metrics | | Architect | Service architecture, dependencies, patterns, integration | | Designer | API design, UX flows, developer experience, consistency | | Security Design | Threat modeling, auth/authz, data protection, OWASP Top 10 | | UX Reviewer | User flows, text wireframes, integration WUs, empty/error states | | CTO | TDD readiness, codebase alignment, completeness, risks |
See the `design-review-gate` skill for full details.
---
When multiple Claude Code sessions are active on the same repository (e.g., parallel worktrees), metaswarm automatically enters **Team Mode**. In Team Mode, agents behave as persistent teammates with context retention across sessions and direct inter-agent messaging for coordination. Mode detection is automatic based on the presence of concurrent sessions.
For the full Team Mode protocol — including message routing, context sharing, and conflict resolution — see `./guides/agent-coordination.md`.
---
After the Architect creates an implementation plan and before it reaches the Design Review Gate, the plan passes through the **Plan Review Gate**. Three adversarial reviewers validate the plan independently:
| Reviewer | Focus | | --- | --- | | **Feasibility** | Technical viability, dependency risks, resource constraints | | **Completeness** | Missing work units, untested edge cases, gaps in Definition of Done | | **Scope & Alignment** | Plan stays within issue scope, aligns with codebase conventions |
All 3 must APPROVE before the plan proceeds. See the `plan-review-gate` skill for the full skill definition.
---
After design review approval, implementation follows the **4-phase execution loop** per work unit. This replaces the previous linear "implement then review" flow with rigorous independent validation and adversarial review.
**Trust nothing. Verify everything. Review adversarially.**
Before submitting to the Design Review Gate, the orchestrator runs
A self-improving multi-agent orchestration framework for Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and Codex CLI.
Enforces design review gate after brainstorming — bridges superpowers:brainstorming into the metaswarm quality pipeline
Create comprehensive GitHub issues with TDD plans, acceptance criteria, and agent instructions for autonomous PR lifecycle…
Automatic review gate that runs after brainstorming completes - spawns PM, Architect, Designer, Security, and CTO agents in…
Delegate implementation and review tasks to external AI CLI tools (Codex, Gemini) with cross-model adversarial review
Address PR review feedback systematically — fetch inline comments, review bodies, handle outside-diff-range comments, resolve…
Analyze the current session and write a self-contained handoff document so a fresh agent can resume the work with full context —…