create-issue
Create comprehensive GitHub issues with TDD plans, acceptance criteria, and agent instructions for autonomous PR lifecycle…
Enforces design review gate after brainstorming — bridges superpowers:brainstorming into the metaswarm quality pipeline
$ npx -y skills add dsifry/metaswarm --skill brainstorming-extension --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/brainstorming-extensionContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Enforces design review gate after brainstorming — bridges superpowers:brainstorming into the metaswarm quality pipeline
name: brainstorming-extension description: Enforces design review gate after brainstorming — bridges superpowers:brainstorming into the metaswarm quality pipeline auto_activate: true triggers: - after:superpowers:brainstorming - "design document committed"
This skill bridges `superpowers:brainstorming` into the metaswarm quality pipeline by enforcing the Design Review Gate after any design document is created. Without this bridge, brainstorming flows directly into `writing-plans`, bypassing the 5-agent design review that catches architectural, security, and requirements issues before expensive implementation begins.
**This is a critical workflow enforcement point, not a passive extension.**
---
`superpowers:brainstorming` has a built-in terminal state: "The ONLY skill you invoke after brainstorming is writing-plans." This creates a pipeline bypass:
WITHOUT this extension (broken flow):
superpowers:brainstorming
└── Commits design doc
└── writing-plans (DIRECTLY — no review!)
└── executing-plans
└── Implementation begins on UNREVIEWED designWITH this extension (correct flow):
superpowers:brainstorming
└── Commits design doc
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ MANDATORY DESIGN REVIEW GATE │
│ (Enforced by CLAUDE.md + start-task) │
│ │
│ 5 parallel review agents: │
│ • Product Manager (use cases) │
│ • Architect (architecture) │
│ • Designer (UX/API) │
│ • Security Design (threats) │
│ • CTO (TDD readiness) │
│ │
│ ALL FIVE must APPROVE │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
ALL APPROVED? ────No────► Iterate on design (max 3)
│
Yes
│
▼
writing-plans → plan-review-gate → orchestrated-execution---
YAML frontmatter triggers (`auto_activate`, `triggers`) are metadata hints — Claude Code does not enforce them automatically. Instead, this enforcement works through three redundant mechanisms:
The CLAUDE.md template contains a "Workflow Enforcement (MANDATORY)" section that explicitly states:
> After brainstorming: STOP → Run Design Review Gate → Wait for all 5 agents to APPROVE → Only then proceed
This instruction is loaded into every conversation and overrides conflicting skill instructions.
The `/start-task` command's Problem Definition Phase includes an explicit "MANDATORY HANDOFF" block that requires the design review gate after brainstorming.
When this skill is loaded (either by name or auto-activation), it provides the detailed procedure below.
---
When `superpowers:brainstorming` commits a design document:
## Design Review Gate Activated Your design document has been committed. Before proceeding to implementation, I'll run it through our 5-agent review panel. Spawning reviews: - Product Manager Agent (use case/requirements validation) - Architect Agent (technical architecture) - Designer Agent (UX/API design) - Security Design Agent (threat modeling/security review) - CTO Agent (TDD readiness) This typically takes 2-3 minutes...
Invoke the `design-review-gate` skill with the path to the design document. This spawns all 5 review agents in parallel.
**If ALL APPROVED:**
## Design Review Gate: PASSED All five reviewers have approved your design! | Agent | Verdict | Notes | | --------------- | -------- | ------------------------------------- | | Product Manager | APPROVED | Clear use cases, measurable benefits | | Architect | APPROVED | Clean architecture, follows patterns | | Designer | APPROVED | Good API design, clear error states | | Security Design | APPROVED | No high-risk threats, mitigations OK | | CTO | APPROVED | TDD specs present, ready to implement | ### Next Steps 1. Create epic for this feature 2. Create implementation plan (writing-plans) 3. Run plan through Plan Review Gate (3 adversarial reviewers) 4. Set up worktree for isolated development 5. Begin orchestrated execution Ready to proceed? [Yes / No]
**If ANY NEEDS_REVISION:**
## Design Review Gate: NEEDS REVISION Some reviewers found issues that need to be addressed. ### Blocking Issues [Agent-specific issues listed here] ### Questions Requiring Answers [Questions listed here] --- Please revise the design document and I'll re-run the review gate. (Iteration 1 of 3)
---
The review gate can be skipped ONLY when:
---
A self-improving multi-agent orchestration framework for Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and Codex CLI.
Create comprehensive GitHub issues with TDD plans, acceptance criteria, and agent instructions for autonomous PR lifecycle…
Automatic review gate that runs after brainstorming completes - spawns PM, Architect, Designer, Security, and CTO agents in…
Delegate implementation and review tasks to external AI CLI tools (Codex, Gemini) with cross-model adversarial review
Address PR review feedback systematically — fetch inline comments, review bodies, handle outside-diff-range comments, resolve…
Analyze the current session and write a self-contained handoff document so a fresh agent can resume the work with full context —…
Migrate from npm-installed metaswarm to the marketplace plugin — removes redundant files with safety checks