harden-task-file
Harden a manifest-dev task guidance file for one-shot quality — either /define''s quality-gate/Default set or figure-out''s probe set. Iterates: orthogonality…
Completion marker for the /do workflow. Outputs a plain-prose summary of what was built. Called by /do after every Acceptance Criterion and Global Invariant has fresh PASS evidence, when the manifest is complete, all criteria pass, or the workflow needs to wrap up with a
$ npx -y skills add doodledood/manifest-dev --skill done --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/doneContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Completion marker for the /do workflow. Outputs a plain-prose summary of what was built. Called by /do after every Acceptance Criterion and Global Invariant has fresh PASS evidence, when the manifest is complete, all criteria pass, or the workflow needs to wrap up with a
name: done description: 'Completion marker for the /do workflow. Outputs a plain-prose summary of what was built. Called by /do after every Acceptance Criterion and Global Invariant has fresh PASS evidence, when the manifest is complete, all criteria pass, or the workflow needs to wrap up with a completion summary.' user-invocable: false
Receive the manifest path from `/do`, along with the basis on which each Acceptance Criterion and Global Invariant was judged to hold.
Include material autonomous decisions and their rationale, including any Appetite revision and why its benefit justified the added complexity and maintenance, even when already recorded in the execution log.
Emit a completion summary in plain prose: what was built, the key changes (files, behavioral effect — not just paths), any Process Guidance departed from and any deviation from the Initial Approach or the Deliverable order with why, anything notable about how the work landed. State the basis for each gate exactly as `/do` supplied it. Name any findings a gate reported below its threshold, too — they were handed over rather than repaired, and this summary is where the user meets them — and any gate whose bar the run read as suspect without a user to ask, with what the rounds beneath it turned up. Name all of these even when an execution log already records them; a reader of the summary should not have to open the log to learn which advisory guidance was set aside or how the plan moved. Adapt detail to the task's complexity — a small fix gets a couple of sentences; a multi-deliverable refactor gets a paragraph or two. Multi-repo manifests: a single summary covers the whole manifest, naming which repos' deliverables were verified.
Reachable only after every Acceptance Criterion and Global Invariant holds on fresh evidence, with none left unverified, failing, stale, actionably blocked, or pending escalation. End with the mandatory trailing line — directive, not observational, because the manifest stays the source of truth post-completion:
*If the next message describes a change or new requirement (not a pure question), invoke `/define <this-manifest-path>` to amend. Pure questions are answered inline.*
Skills for agentic coding CLIs. They keep three things in your project instead of in your head: what it's becoming, what's worth doing next, and what done means here. The agent reads them, works against them, and checks the result before reporting it finished.
Harden a manifest-dev task guidance file for one-shot quality — either /define''s quality-gate/Default set or figure-out''s probe set. Iterates: orthogonality…
Analyze Claude Code sessions to learn what went right/wrong and suggest high-confidence improvements to skills. Use when asked to analyze a session, learn from…
Sync the prompt-engineering plugin from a local clone of claude-code-plugins into .claude/ so the repo is self-contained for isolated/web environments. Copies…
Regenerate the Codex distribution copy of the plugin skills and check it for drift. Run after changing anything under claude-plugins/*/skills. OpenCode and Pi…
Analyzes the current project structure and tech stack. Use when asked to explore, understand, or summarize a project. Trigger terms: project overview, analyze…
Author-side PR lifecycle babysitter and companion to review-pr. Use when the user wants to tend an existing GitHub PR through CI, review threads, description…