Skip to content
Development
Command

/hop_evaluate_nano_agents

Using the nano-agent mcp server, execute the following nano agents with their respective prompts, models, and providers then rank the results based on the `Response Format`.

From plugin
nano-agent
20412 skills10 agents12 commands

How it fires

How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/hop_evaluate_nano_agents

Context preview

What this command does when you run it.

Using the nano-agent mcp server, execute the following nano agents with their respective prompts, models, and providers then rank the results based on the `Response Format`.

Command definition

hop_evaluate_nano_agents.md

HOP Evaluate Nano Agents

Using the nano-agent mcp server, execute the following nano agents with their respective prompts, models, and providers then rank the results based on the `Response Format`.

Instructions

  • We'll use the grading system S, A, B, C, D, F where S is the best and F is the worst.
  • The prompt in the `Evaluation Details` contains the exact prompt to execute for your nano-agents.
  • IMPORTANT: Execute each nano-agent in parallel.
  • IMPORTANT: Here we're delegating work to the nano-agents, do not do any work yourself on behalf of the nano-agents.
  • IMPORTANT: When you write the prompt for the nano-agents, be absolutely clear not to change the prompt in anyway unless you are specifying the model to make the results unique.
  • IMPORTANT: You're calling the respective claude code sub agents - do not call the `mcp__nano-agent__prompt_nano_agent` tool directly, let the sub agent's handle that.

Evaluation Details

Read and Execute: $ARGUMENTS

Response Format

IMPORTANT: Based on the response from the `Evaluation Details` step, format your response into the following format and display it back to the user. Be sure not to make any changes to the responses from the nano-agents.

Agent Responses

| Model | Response | | ---------- | --------------- | | model_name | actual_response |

Results Summary

| Model | Performance Grade | Speed Grade | Cost Grade | Overall Grade | | ---------- | ----------------- | ----------- | ---------- | ------------- | | model_name | S-F | S-F | S-F | S-F |

Performance Metrics

| Model | Execution Time | Total Tokens | Total Cost | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | | ---------- | -------------- | ------------ | ---------- | ------------ | ------------- | | model_name | X.XXs | XXX | $X.XXXXX | XXX | XXX |

Grading Criteria

  • **Performance**: Combines accuracy and conciseness of the response
  • **Speed**: Relative ranking (fastest = S, slowest = worst grade)
  • **Cost**: Relative ranking (cheapest = S, most expensive = worst grade)
  • **Overall**: Weighted average considering all factors

Final Ranking

1. **1st Place**: model_name (Overall Grade: X) 2. **2nd Place**: model_name (Overall Grade: X) 3. **3rd Place**: model_name (Overall Grade: X)

Read more
Ships withnano-agent

Watched how we used GPT-5 and Claude Code with nano-agents here. What? A MCP Server for experimental, small scale engineering agents with multi-provider LLM support. Why?

Get the whole plugin