agent-native-audit
Run comprehensive agent-native architecture review with scored principles
Triage and categorize findings for the CLI todo system
$ npx -y skills add davekilleen/Dex --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/triageContext preview
What this command does when you run it.
Triage and categorize findings for the CLI todo system
name: triage description: Triage and categorize findings for the CLI todo system argument-hint: "[findings list or source type]"
Present all findings, decisions, or issues here one by one for triage. The goal is to go through each item and decide whether to add it to the CLI todo system.
**IMPORTANT: DO NOT CODE ANYTHING DURING TRIAGE!**
This command is for:
For each finding, present in this format:
--- Issue #X: [Brief Title] Severity: ๐ด P1 (CRITICAL) / ๐ก P2 (IMPORTANT) / ๐ต P3 (NICE-TO-HAVE) Category: [Security/Performance/Architecture/Bug/Feature/etc.] Description: [Detailed explanation of the issue or improvement] Location: [file_path:line_number] Problem Scenario: [Step by step what's wrong or could happen] Proposed Solution: [How to fix it] Estimated Effort: [Small (< 2 hours) / Medium (2-8 hours) / Large (> 8 hours)] --- Do you want to add this to the todo list? 1. yes - create todo file 2. next - skip this item 3. custom - modify before creating
**When user says "yes":**
1. **Update existing todo file** (if it exists) or **Create new filename:**
If todo already exists (from code review):
If creating new todo:
{next_id}-ready-{priority}-{brief-description}.mdPriority mapping:
Example: `042-ready-p1-transaction-boundaries.md`
2. **Update YAML frontmatter:**
--- status: ready # IMPORTANT: Change from "pending" to "ready" priority: p1 # or p2, p3 based on severity issue_id: "042" tags: [category, relevant-tags] dependencies: [] ---
3. **Populate or update the file:**
# [Issue Title]
## Problem Statement
[Description from finding]
## Findings
- [Key discoveries]
- Location: [file_path:line_number]
- [Scenario details]
## Proposed Solutions
### Option 1: [Primary solution]
- **Pros**: [Benefits]
- **Cons**: [Drawbacks if any]
- **Effort**: [Small/Medium/Large]
- **Risk**: [Low/Medium/High]
## Recommended Action
[Filled during triage - specific action plan]
## Technical Details
- **Affected Files**: [List files]
- **Related Components**: [Components affected]
- **Database Changes**: [Yes/No - describe if yes]
## Resources
- Original finding: [Source of this issue]
- Related issues: [If any]
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] [Specific success criteria]
- [ ] Tests pass
- [ ] Code reviewed
## Work Log
### {date} - Approved for Work
**By:** Claude Triage System
**Actions:**
- Issue approved during triage session
- Status changed from pending โ ready
- Ready to be picked up and worked on
**Learnings:**
- [Context and insights]
## Notes
Source: Triage session on {date}4. **Confirm approval:** "โ Approved: `{new_filename}` (Issue #{issue_id}) - Status: **ready** โ Ready to work on"
**When user says "next":**
**When user says "custom":**
After all items processed:
## Triage Complete **Total Items:** [X] **Todos Approved (ready):** [Y] **Skipped:** [Z] ### Approved Todos (Ready for Work): - `042-ready-p1-transaction-boundaries.md` - Transaction boundary issue - `043-ready-p2-cache-optimization.md` - Cache performance improvement ... ### Skipped Items (Deleted): - Item #5: [reason] - Removed from todos/ - Item #12: [reason] - Removed from todos/ ### Summary of Changes Made: During triage, the following status updates occurred: - **Pending โ Ready:** Filenames and frontmatter updated to reflect approved status - **Deleted:** Todo files for skipped findings removed from todos/ directory - Each approved file now has `status: ready` in YAML frontmatter ### Next Steps: 1. View approved todos ready for work: ```bash ls todos/*-ready-*.md
2. Start work on approved items: ```bash /resolve_todo_parallel # Work on multiple approved items efficiently
3. Or pick individual items to work on
4. As you work, update todo status:
## Example Response Format
---
Issue #5: Missing Transaction Boundaries for Multi-Step Operations
Severity: ๐ด P1 (CRITICAL)
Category: Data Integrity / Security
Description: The google_oauth2_connected callback in GoogleOauthCallbacks concern performs multiple database operations without transaction protection. If any step fails midway, the database is left in an inconsistent state.
Location: app/controllers/concerns/google_oauth_callbacks.rb:13-50
Problem Scenario:
1. User.update succeeds (email changed) 2. Account.save! fails (validation error) 3. Result: User has changed email but no associated Account 4. Next login attempt fails completely
Operations Without Transaction:
A personal operating system for your work. Strategic work management, meeting intelligence, relationship tracking, daily planning โ all configured for your specific role.
Repo: davekilleen/Dex
Run comprehensive agent-native architecture review with scored principles
Create or edit Claude Code skills with expert guidance on structure and best practices
Enhance a plan with parallel research agents for each section to add depth, best practices, and implementation details
Record a video walkthrough of a feature and add it to the PR description