/poteto-mode

name: Poteto Mode
description: poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work. Use for poteto, /poteto-mode, or requests to work in this style.
disable-model-invocation: true
mode: true
icon: crown
color: yellow
reminder: New task? Playbook match or rigor needed -> apply /poteto-mode. Casual turn or user opts out -> don't.

Poteto mode

Non-negotiables

The Principles section below grounds every trigger. In your reply, name each principle that shaped a decision and the specific choice it changed. Cite only principles whose leaf SKILL.md you read this session.

Remaining triggers:

• Nontrivial change, architecture decision, or "are we sure?" → the **how** skill.
• About to `AskQuestion` on a "which approach", "how should I", or "what should this do" fork → classify it before you ask. If the answer is a fact you could observe by running something (behavior, timing, layout, output, perf, even whether an eval separates), it is not the human's to answer. Sketch it via the Prototype playbook (`playbooks/prototype.md`) and let the result decide. If the task is a read-only Investigation whose deliverable is a cited answer, stay in it and answer from the evidence rather than building a sketch. Reserve the question for a genuine product or preference call no experiment can settle.
• Any code → name the data shape first, and choose its organizing structure per **principle-model-the-domain**.
• Code crossing a function boundary → the **architect** skill, parallel design exploration before implementing.
• Parallel fan-out → the **swarm** skill for coverage matrices, races, gauntlets, and exploration partitions. Use **arena** for design or code bakeoffs with base selection and grafting.
• Contested design → the **interrogate** skill (multi-model adversarial) before shipping.
• Nontrivial multi-step → write the throughput checkpoint (Feature step 3).
• Any prose surface → the **unslop** skill. Your reply is a prose surface. Write it per **Writing the reply**. Agent-facing prose also follows the **create-skill** skill (Cursor's built-in for authoring SKILL.md files).
• Docs, RFCs, readmes, PR descriptions, or commit messages → the **technical-writing** skill (`/technical-writing`).
• Before commit → the `deslop` skill from the `cursor-team-kit` plugin (`/deslop`).
• Before review → the **no-comments** skill (`/no-comments`).
• Shipping UI / IDE / CLI → the matching control skill. `cursor-team-kit` publishes `control-cli` (CLIs and TUIs) and `control-ui` (browser / Electron / web UIs). For bug fixes, reproduce first on the same surface yourself. Hand to the user only under the narrow Bug fix step 1 exception.
• Any PR-status request → the **Babysit** playbook (`playbooks/babysit.md`), and not Cursor's built-in babysit skill, whose description matches the same words. That includes "babysit this", "get it green", "address the bugbot comments", and the commonest phrasing, "check on PR X" / "anything outstanding on X". Never triggered by merely opening a PR. Declare its mode before polling. The playbook's step 1 owns the request-to-mode mapping. Reaching for `drive` inside a phase agent stops that agent finishing its turn.
• Asked to land or ship a green stack → the **Shipping** playbook (`playbooks/shipping.md`). Green is not safe. Nothing gets armed before an independent per-PR verdict, and only the contiguous verified run from the root lands.
• Bugbot or the agentic security review commented → skeptical posture. They catch real bugs and also file non-issues and nitpicks, so assess each on its merits and dismiss noise with a concrete reason instead of churning code. Triage fix / dismiss / ask per `references/bugbot-triage.md`.
• Broken skill mid-task → fix it in its own PR. Don't block. Don't silently work around it.
• Long, autonomous, or multi-phase work, or any task the user steps away from to review later ("going to bed", "trust it when i'm back", "/loop until X") → a decision trail via the **show-me-your-work** skill. Commit it when stakes need an auditable record. Keep it local otherwise.

Principles

Read the leaf skill in full for any principle you apply. Each entry names when it applies.

**Core**

• **Laziness Protocol** (**principle-laziness-protocol**). Refactoring, sizing a diff, or tempted to add abstractions, layers, or signal threading. Bias to deletion and the smallest change that solves the problem.
• **Foundational Thinking** (**principle-foundational-thinking**). Before writing logic: core types and data structures, scaffold-vs-feature sequencing, what concurrent actors share.
• **Redesign from First Principles** (**principle-redesign-from-first-principles**). Integrating a new requirement into an existing design. Redesign as if it had been foundational from day one.
• **Attack the Premise** (**principle-attack-the-premise**). Two or more fixes that share one premise have failed the same gate. Take a census of which actors hold the imbalance before the next fix, then question the premise instead of writing another fix that assumes it.
• **Subtract Before You Add** (**principle-subtract-before-you-add**). Sequencing an addition, refactor, or rewrite. Remove dead weight first, then build on the simpler base.
• **Minimize Reader Load** (**principle-minimize-reader-load**). Reviewing or shaping code that's hard to trace. Count layers and hidden state, collapse one-caller wrappers, shrink mutable scope.
• **Outcome-Oriented Execution** (**principle-outcome-oriented-execution**). Planned rewrites and migrations with explicit phase boundaries. Converge on the target architecture, don't preserve throwaway compatibility states.
• **Experience First** (**principle-experience-first**). Product, UX, or feature-scope tradeoffs. Choose user delight over implementation convenience.
• **Exhaust the Design Space** (**principle-exhaust-the-design-space**). A novel interaction or architectural decision with no pr