/website-to-video

name: website-to-video
description: "Use when the user wants a video of a website (site tour, portfolio, docs or landing-page showcase) captured from a URL. Deprecated upstream since v0.7.59: folded into /product-launch-video, which owns URL promo work."

> **Deprecated upstream since v0.7.59 — folded into `/product-launch-video`; use that skill for new work.**

> **First, keep this skill fresh — run silently, don't ask:** `npx hyperframes skills update website-to-video`. A fast no-op when everything is current; otherwise it refreshes this skill plus the core domain skills it depends on before you rely on them.

> **media-use**: Before sourcing audio/images/logos, call `/media-use` to resolve BGM/SFX/images from the HeyGen catalog and brand logos from their official sources. Run `--adopt` first to register existing assets. See `/media-use` skill.

Website to HyperFrames

Capture a website, then produce a professional video from it.

> **Confirm the route before Step 0.** This skill makes a video _of / from a general site_. If the user is really **marketing / launching / promoting a product** (even from this URL, even "promo for our site") → `/product-launch-video`. A **topic explainer with no site** → `/faceless-explainer`; a **GitHub PR** → `/pr-to-video`; **re-cutting / recoloring / reordering an existing video file** → out of scope. Routed here on a vague "make a video", or unsure launch-vs-general-site? **Read `/hyperframes` first** (full routing table + § What HyperFrames cannot do).

Users say things like:

• "Turn this website into a 15-second social clip for Instagram"
• "Make a 30-second site tour / showcase from https://..."
• "Capture our homepage and build a video from its own visuals"

The workflow has 7 steps. Each produces an artifact that gates the next. By default it's collaborative — gates marked 💬 stop and ask the user. Mode semantics (signals, propagation, gate taxonomy) are canonical in `../hyperframes-core/references/brief-contract.md`; when the user signals autonomous mode ("decide for me", "surprise me"), 💬 user-preference gates are skipped — see step-2-brief.md for how that propagates through this workflow.

**Autonomous mode is NOT "skip all gates"** (brief contract § 1). It covers user-preference questions (TTS provider, voice, color emphasis, beat count, music yes/no, captions yes/no — where the agent decides on the user's behalf). It does NOT cover quality-verification gates. The following remain non-skippable in auto mode:

• Asset Audit (Step 3) — viewing contact sheets and justifying USE/SKIP for each asset
• Per-beat HTML read (Step 5) — structured evidence block per beat
• DoD checklist (Step 6) — including animation-map, per-warning WCAG verification, audio/motion playback
• Honest disclosure section (Step 6) — "What I did NOT verify" must appear in your final summary

If you find yourself reasoning "auto mode says bias toward action, so I'll skip X" — and X is a verification gate, not a preference question — that reasoning is wrong. Bias toward action applies to deciding _what to build_, not to deciding _whether to verify_.

---

Step 0: Capture & Understand the Brand

**Read:** [references/step-0-capture.md](references/step-0-capture.md)

Capture the site, then read the extracted data to understand the **brand and product** — what it does, who it's for, what voice it speaks in, what mood it lives in. The captured assets are a brand toolkit for later, not the building blocks the video is made from.

**Show sign-in status before the brief** — run `npx hyperframes auth status` and **relay its output verbatim (don't paraphrase or rewrite it).** It reports whether voice/BGM will use HeyGen or local engines and, when not signed in, how to sign in. **If not signed in, STOP and wait for the user to choose — sign in, or say "go"/"offline" to continue with local engines — before asking the brief or anything else.** Treat it as a real decision point, not a passing note; don't fold the choice into the brief question, and don't write keys into a per-repo `.env`. (In autonomous mode, note the status and continue offline.) See `../media-use` → Preflight for the canonical guidance.

**Gate:** Site summary printed — strategy-first (what the product does, who it's for, brand voice) before the asset / color / font inventory; sign-in status was shown (signed in, or continuing offline).

---

Step 1: Brand Identity

**Read:** [references/step-1-design.md](references/step-1-design.md)

Write DESIGN.md — a brand cheat sheet covering the visual identity: colors, typography, component styles, layout principles. Use `design-styles.json` for exact computed values.

**Speed option:** For fast-pacing videos (billboard-per-beat), DESIGN.md can be a 50-line summary of colors + fonts + do's/don'ts — not a 300-line document. The sub-agent prompt in Step 5 pastes brand values directly, so DESIGN.md depth only matters for complex compositions.

**Gate:** `DESIGN.md` exists (any length) with at minimum: color palette, font choices, and do's/don'ts.

---

Step 2: Strategy & Messaging

**Read:** [references/step-2-brief.md](references/step-2-brief.md), [references/capabilities.md](references/capabilities.md) (scan the Table of Contents — deep-dive sections only as needed)

Align with the user on **what the video must communicate** before talking visuals or assets. Parse the user's prompt — they probably already gave you the video type and style. Ask only what's missing: the ONE thing this video must say, the narrative arc, and the audience.

**Gate:** Video type, duration, format, and — critically — the message and narrative arc are locked. Without those, Step 3 can't write a concept-first storyboard.

---

Step 3: Storyboard + Script 💬

**Read:** [references/step-3-storyboard.md](references/step-3-storyboard.md)

Write the storyboard concept-first: message → narrative arc → beats that serve the arc → techniques per beat → brand accents pass at the end. Then write