/plan

/team plan — Planning Pipeline

> Called by team.md router when action is `plan`.

Role Selection Bias

| Layer | Preferred Roles | Count | |-------|----------------|-------| | L1 | technical-analyst, business-analyst, domain-researcher | 2-3 | | L2 | senior-pm, (domain-dependent engineers), jira-specialist (if Jira workflow planning) | 2-3 | | L3 | domain-accuracy, doc-quality | 2 | | L4 | principal-pm | 1 |

Pipeline Customization

Layer 1: Scope Research

L1 agents assess:

• Current state of the system/project. When `.arch/index.json` exists and is CURRENT, read

`.arch/INDEX.md` for the component map instead of re-deriving the structure — it is a validated artifact in which every path has been confirmed to exist.

• What's already been built vs what's needed
• Dependencies and sequencing constraints
• Risk areas that need mitigation in the plan

Layer 2: Plan Creation

• **Mode:** `default` (creates plan documents, not source code)
• Agents produce structured plans with:
• Phase breakdown with clear goals
• Task decomposition within each phase
• Dependency graph (what blocks what)
• Effort estimates and sequencing
• Success criteria per phase

**Toolkit integration:**

• Check team:toolkit.md for "Project Orchestration" entry
• If GSD active → create PLAN.md files compatible with GSD format (frontmatter: wave, depends_on, files_modified, autonomous, requirements, must_haves). When `.arch/index.json` exists and is CURRENT, populate `files_modified` from the primary paths of the components the phase touches, then narrow it to the actual files — component paths are the starting set, never the final answer, because a component may own thousands of files.
• If no GSD → create standalone plan documents

GSD Integration (C4)

When `.planning/` exists:

• Read ROADMAP.md and REQUIREMENTS.md for context
• Plans follow GSD conventions
• Output: `.planning/phases/{phase_dir}/PLAN.md` files with proper frontmatter
• Compatible with `/gsd:execute-phase`

Layer 3: Plan Validation

L3 agents check:

• Are all requirements covered?
• Is the task decomposition achievable?
• Are dependencies correctly mapped?
• Are estimates realistic?
• Are success criteria measurable?

Layer 4: Plan Approval

Principal reviews for:

• Strategic alignment
• Resource efficiency
• Risk coverage
• Sequencing optimality